Bravenboer Nathalie, Bredella Miriam A, Chauveau Christophe, Corsi Alessandro, Douni Eleni, Ferris William F, Riminucci Mara, Robey Pamela G, Rojas-Sutterlin Shanti, Rosen Clifford, Schulz Tim J, Cawthorn William P
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 24;10:923. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00923. eCollection 2019.
Research into bone marrow adiposity (BMA) has expanded greatly since the late 1990s, leading to development of new methods for the study of bone marrow adipocytes. Simultaneously, research fields interested in BMA have diversified substantially. This increasing interest is revealing fundamental new knowledge of BMA; however, it has also led to a highly variable nomenclature that makes it difficult to interpret and compare results from different studies. A consensus on BMA nomenclature has therefore become indispensable. This article addresses this critical need for standardised terminology and consistent reporting of parameters related to BMA research. The International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society (BMAS) was formed in 2017 to consolidate the growing scientific community interested in BMA. To address the BMA nomenclature challenge, BMAS members from diverse fields established a working group (WG). Based on their broad expertise, the WG first reviewed the existing, unsystematic nomenclature and identified terms, and concepts requiring further discussion. They thereby identified and defined 8 broad concepts and methods central to BMA research. Notably, these had been described using 519 unique combinations of term, abbreviation and unit, many of which were overlapping or redundant. On this foundation a second consensus was reached, with each term classified as "" or "." As a result, the WG reached a consensus to craft recommendations for 26 terms related to concepts and methods in BMA research. This was approved by the Scientific Board and Executive Board of BMAS and is the basis for the present recommendations for a formal BMA nomenclature. As an example, several terms or abbreviations have been used to represent "bone marrow adipocytes," including , and . The WG decided that should refer to "bone marrow adiposity"; that is too similar to ; and noted that "Ad" has previously been recommended to refer to adipocytes. Thus, it was recommended to use to represent . In conclusion, the standard nomenclature proposed in this article should be followed for all communications of results related to BMA. This will allow for better interactions both inside and outside of this emerging scientific community.
自20世纪90年代末以来,对骨髓脂肪化(BMA)的研究有了极大的扩展,催生了研究骨髓脂肪细胞的新方法。与此同时,对BMA感兴趣的研究领域也大幅多样化。这种日益增长的兴趣正在揭示关于BMA的全新基础知识;然而,这也导致了命名高度可变,使得难以解释和比较不同研究的结果。因此,关于BMA命名的共识变得不可或缺。本文满足了对与BMA研究相关的标准化术语和参数一致报告的这一关键需求。国际骨髓脂肪化协会(BMAS)于2017年成立,以凝聚对BMA感兴趣的不断壮大的科学界。为应对BMA命名挑战,来自不同领域的BMAS成员成立了一个工作组(WG)。基于其广泛的专业知识,工作组首先审查了现有的、不系统的命名法,并确定了需要进一步讨论的术语和概念。他们从而确定并定义了BMA研究核心的8个广泛概念和方法。值得注意的是,这些概念和方法用术语、缩写和单位的519种独特组合来描述,其中许多是重叠或冗余的。在此基础上达成了第二项共识,每个术语被分类为“”或“.”。结果,工作组就BMA研究中与概念和方法相关联的26个术语制定建议达成了共识。这得到了BMAS科学委员会和执行委员会的批准,并且是当前正式BMA命名法建议的基础。例如,已使用几个术语或缩写来表示“骨髓脂肪细胞”,包括、和。工作组决定应指代“骨髓脂肪化”;与过于相似;并指出之前已建议用“Ad”指代脂肪细胞。因此,建议使用来表示。总之,对于所有与BMA相关的结果交流,都应遵循本文提出的标准命名法。这将有助于这个新兴科学界内外更好地互动。