UEI Parasitologia Médica, Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Lisboa, Portugal.
UEI Bioestatística e Sáude Internacional, Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Lisboa, Portugal.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Feb 11;9(1):348-365. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1722035. eCollection 2020.
The release of modified mosquitoes to suppress/replace vectors constitutes a promising tool for vector control and disease prevention. Evidence regarding these innovative modification techniques is scarce and disperse. This work conducted a systematic review, gathering and analysing research articles from PubMed and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde databases whose results report efficacy and non-target effects of using modified insects for disease prevention, until 2016. More than 1500 publications were screened and 349 were analysed. Only 12/3.4% articles reported field-based evidence and 41/11.7% covered modification strategies' post-release efficacy. Variability in the effective results (90/25.7%) questioned its reproducibility in different settings. We also found publications reporting reversal outcomes 38/10.9%, (e.g. post-release increase of vector population). Ecological effects were also reported, such as horizontal transfer events (54/15.5%), and worsening pathogenesis induced by natural (10/2.9%). Present work revealed promising outcomes of modifying strategies. However, it also revealed a need for field-based evidence mainly regarding epidemiologic and long-term impact. It pointed out some eventual irreversible and important effects that must not be ignored when considering open-field releases, and that may constitute constraints to generate the missing field evidence. Present work constitutes a baseline of knowledge, offering also a methodological approach that may facilitate future updates.
释放改良蚊子以抑制/替代病媒构成了一种有前途的病媒控制和疾病预防工具。关于这些创新的改良技术的证据很少且分散。这项工作进行了系统评价,从 PubMed 和 Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde 数据库中收集和分析了研究文章,这些文章的结果报告了使用改良昆虫进行疾病预防的功效和非靶标效应,直到 2016 年。筛选了 1500 多篇出版物,分析了 349 篇。只有 12/3.4%的文章报告了基于现场的证据,41/11.7%的文章涵盖了改良策略释放后的功效。有效结果的可变性(90/25.7%)质疑其在不同环境下的可重复性。我们还发现有报道称出现了逆转结果(38/10.9%),例如(例如释放后病媒种群增加)。还报告了生态效应,例如水平转移事件(54/15.5%),以及自然诱导的发病机制恶化(10/2.9%)。目前的工作揭示了改良策略的有希望的结果。然而,它也揭示了对基于现场的证据的需求,主要是关于流行病学和长期影响。它指出了一些可能不可逆转的重要影响,在考虑野外释放时不能忽视这些影响,这些影响可能会对产生缺失的现场证据构成限制。目前的工作构成了知识的基线,并提供了一种方法学方法,可能会促进未来的更新。