Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;121(6):661-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
The aim of the research was to assess the quality of obtained information from YouTube videos related to dental implant.
"Dental implant" word was used as a key word in YouTube videos in this study. Videos were evaluated by three oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The first 150 videos were screened. After exclusion criterias, seventy-four videos were investigated regard to content's usefulness. The usefulness scores of the videos were poor (0), moderate (1) and excellent (2). Upload sources were recorded that were categorized as the individual users, health care professionals, and health companies. The type of videos was classified 3 sections: educational videos, patient's experience, and scientifically erroneous. We examined videos for the content presence in eight non-mutually exclusive domains of dental implant.
Seventy-four videos were evaluated. The usefulness score of the videos ranged from 0-2 and the average was 0.324. The most discussed topics were regarding with procedures of dental implant (42.57%), however, the least one was related to contraindications (1%). No significant correlation was found between the source of upload and video usefulness score (P=0.086). There was a significant difference between number of comments and the video types. (P=0.002).
Our outcome emphasized that YouTube videos related to dental implant were a limited source for the patients. Many issues regarding dental implant were ignored in these videos.
本研究旨在评估与牙种植体相关的 YouTube 视频中获得信息的质量。
在本研究中,使用“牙种植体”一词作为 YouTube 视频中的关键字。由三位口腔颌面外科医生评估视频。筛选前 150 个视频。排除标准后,对 74 个视频的内容有用性进行了调查。视频的有用性评分较差(0)、中等(1)和优秀(2)。记录上传来源,分为个人用户、医疗保健专业人员和医疗保健公司。视频类型分为教育视频、患者体验和科学错误三个部分。我们检查了视频中与牙种植体的八个非互斥领域相关的内容。
共评估了 74 个视频。视频的有用性评分范围为 0-2,平均得分为 0.324。讨论最多的主题是牙种植体的程序(42.57%),而最少的主题是与禁忌症(1%)相关的内容。上传来源与视频有用性评分之间无显著相关性(P=0.086)。评论数量与视频类型之间存在显著差异(P=0.002)。
我们的研究结果强调,与牙种植体相关的 YouTube 视频是患者的有限信息来源。这些视频忽略了许多与牙种植体相关的问题。