Monti Serena, Brancato Valentina, Di Costanzo Giuseppe, Basso Luca, Puglia Marta, Ragozzino Alfonso, Salvatore Marco, Cavaliere Carlo
IRCCS SDN, 80143 Naples, Italy.
Ospedale S. Maria delle Grazie, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Feb 7;12(2):390. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020390.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a disease affecting an increasing number of men worldwide. Several efforts have been made to identify imaging biomarkers to non-invasively detect and characterize PCa, with substantial improvements thanks to multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI). In recent years, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) was proposed to be directly related to tissue physiological and pathological characteristic, while the radiomic approach was proven to be a key method to study cancer imaging phenotypes. Our aim was to compare a standard radiomic model for PCa detection, built using T2-weighted (T2W) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), with an advanced one, including DKI and quantitative Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE), while also evaluating differences in prediction performance when using 2D or 3D lesion segmentation. The obtained results in terms of diagnostic accuracy were high for all of the performed comparisons, reaching values up to 0.99 for the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and 0.98 for both sensitivity and specificity. In comparison, the radiomic model based on standard features led to prediction performances higher than those of the advanced model, while greater accuracy was achieved by the model extracted from 3D segmentation. These results provide new insights into active topics of discussion, such as choosing the most convenient acquisition protocol and the most appropriate postprocessing pipeline to accurately detect and characterize PCa.
前列腺癌(PCa)是一种在全球影响着越来越多男性的疾病。人们已做出多项努力来识别成像生物标志物,以非侵入性地检测和表征PCa,借助多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)取得了显著进展。近年来,扩散峰度成像(DKI)被认为与组织的生理和病理特征直接相关,而放射组学方法被证明是研究癌症成像表型的关键方法。我们的目的是比较一个用于PCa检测的标准放射组学模型(使用T2加权(T2W)和表观扩散系数(ADC)构建)与一个先进的模型(包括DKI和定量动态对比增强(DCE)),同时还评估使用二维或三维病变分割时预测性能的差异。在所有进行的比较中,所获得的诊断准确性结果都很高,受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积的值高达0.99,灵敏度和特异性均为0.98。相比之下,基于标准特征的放射组学模型的预测性能高于先进模型,而从三维分割中提取的模型实现了更高的准确性。这些结果为当前的热门讨论话题提供了新的见解,例如选择最便捷的采集方案和最合适的后处理流程以准确检测和表征PCa。