• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与暴露和反应预防治疗强迫症相关的严重负面后果:治疗师态度和经验的调查。

Serious negative consequences associated with exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A survey of therapist attitudes and experiences.

机构信息

Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

The Houston OCD Program, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2020 May;37(5):418-428. doi: 10.1002/da.23000. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1002/da.23000
PMID:32048376
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many therapists are reluctant to conduct exposure and response prevention (ERP) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Negative beliefs about the safety and tolerability of ERP are common, especially for harm-related OCD symptoms. The study examined the nature and frequency of ERP-related serious negative consequences (SNC) and therapist attitudes and experiences providing ERP for harm-related OCD.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was completed by 277 therapists with experience treating OCD using ERP. Questions assessed clinical experiences of harm-related exposures, the nature of SNC, and concerns and clinical considerations regarding ERP.

RESULTS

Therapist's willingness to treat harm-related OCD was high. SNCs were reported for 6 clients (per-client risk: adults 0.05%, youth 0.01%) and 13 therapists (per therapist risk 4.73%, therapist per-year risk 0.004%). Qualitative analysis identified themes relating to the conduct of treatment, specific exposure types, professional issues, and negative perceptions of ERP.

CONCLUSION

SNC associated with ERP for OCD are rare and primarily represent unintended secondary consequences of OCD or misunderstandings regarding the process and rationale behind ERP. Improving access to ERP will require good communication with clients, families, and other professionals regarding the rationale and safety of ERP.

摘要

目的

许多治疗师不愿意对强迫症(OCD)进行暴露和反应预防(ERP)。人们普遍对 ERP 的安全性和耐受性存在负面看法,尤其是对与伤害相关的 OCD 症状。本研究考察了与 ERP 相关的严重负面后果(SNC)的性质和频率,以及治疗师对提供与伤害相关的 OCD 的 ERP 的态度和经验。

方法

使用 ERP 治疗 OCD 经验丰富的 277 名治疗师完成了一项匿名调查。问题评估了与伤害相关的暴露的临床经验、SNC 的性质,以及对 ERP 的关注和临床考虑。

结果

治疗师治疗与伤害相关的 OCD 的意愿很高。有 6 名患者(每位患者的风险:成年人 0.05%,青少年 0.01%)和 13 名治疗师(每位治疗师的风险 4.73%,治疗师每年的风险 0.004%)报告了 SNC。定性分析确定了与治疗实施、特定暴露类型、专业问题以及对 ERP 的负面看法有关的主题。

结论

与 OCD 的 ERP 相关的 SNC 很少见,主要代表 OCD 的意外次要后果或对 ERP 的过程和原理的误解。改善对 ERP 的获取将需要与患者、家属和其他专业人员就 ERP 的原理和安全性进行良好沟通。

相似文献

1
Serious negative consequences associated with exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A survey of therapist attitudes and experiences.与暴露和反应预防治疗强迫症相关的严重负面后果:治疗师态度和经验的调查。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 May;37(5):418-428. doi: 10.1002/da.23000. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Does the therapy manual or the therapist matter most in treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder? A randomized controlled trial of exposure with response or ritual prevention in 118 patients.在强迫症的治疗中,治疗手册或治疗师最重要?118 例患者接受暴露和反应预防或仪式预防的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;71(9):1158-67. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04990blu. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
3
Does the addition of cognitive therapy to exposure and response prevention for obsessive compulsive disorder enhance clinical efficacy? A randomized controlled trial in a community setting.认知疗法联合暴露反应预防治疗强迫症是否能增强临床疗效?一项社区环境下的随机对照试验。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Mar;58(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12188. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
4
"Phobie à deux" and other reasons why clinicians do not apply exposure with response prevention in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.“双重恐惧”及其他临床医生为何不在强迫症患者中应用暴露与反应预防的原因。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Mar;48(2):162-176. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1494750. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
5
Mediators of exposure therapy for youth obsessive-compulsive disorder: specificity and temporal sequence of client and treatment factors.青少年强迫症暴露疗法的调节因素:来访者及治疗因素的特异性和时间顺序
Behav Ther. 2015 May;46(3):395-408. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
6
The Struggle of Behavioral Therapists With Exposure: Self-Reported Practicability, Negative Beliefs, and Therapist Distress About Exposure-Based Interventions.行为治疗师在暴露治疗方面的挣扎:自我报告的可操作性、消极信念以及治疗师对暴露干预的困扰。
Behav Ther. 2019 Mar;50(2):353-366. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
7
How willing are you? Willingness as a predictor of change during treatment of adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder.你有多愿意?意愿作为预测成人强迫症治疗过程中变化的指标。
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Nov;34(11):1057-1064. doi: 10.1002/da.22672. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Participant perspectives on the acceptability and effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive behaviour therapy approaches for obsessive compulsive disorder.参与者对正念认知行为疗法治疗强迫症的可接受性和有效性的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0238845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238845. eCollection 2020.
9
Online Video Teletherapy Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Exposure and Response Prevention: Clinical Outcomes From a Retrospective Longitudinal Observational Study.在线视频远程治疗强迫症使用暴露和反应预防:一项回顾性纵向观察研究的临床结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 19;24(5):e36431. doi: 10.2196/36431.
10
Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.认知行为治疗与暴露反应预防治疗强迫症的随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2019 May 20;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3381-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Family-based cognitive behavioral therapy versus family-based psychoeducation and relaxation training for obsessive-compulsive disorder in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial (TECTO).基于家庭的认知行为疗法与基于家庭的心理教育和放松训练对儿童及青少年强迫症的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验(TECTO)
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02797-4.
2
From Doubt to Direction: Untangling Pediatric Scrupulosity.从怀疑到方向:解开儿童强迫性穷思竭虑之谜
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 21;12(4):528. doi: 10.3390/children12040528.
3
Examining the safety and side effects of exposure therapy in virtual reality for patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
研究虚拟现实暴露疗法对强迫症患者的安全性和副作用。
Neuropsychiatr. 2025 Jun;39(2):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s40211-025-00518-6. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
4
Potential for Harm in the Treatment of Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Pitfalls and Best Practices.儿童强迫症治疗中的潜在危害:陷阱与最佳实践
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 May;53(5):729-745. doi: 10.1007/s10802-024-01258-x. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
5
Adverse events in cognitive behavioral therapy and relaxation training for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A mixed methods study and analysis plan for the TECTO trial.针对患有强迫症的儿童和青少年的认知行为疗法及放松训练中的不良事件:TECTO试验的混合方法研究与分析计划
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jun 20;34:101173. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101173. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Children and Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders.儿童和青少年焦虑障碍的认知行为治疗。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2023 Jul;32(3):543-558. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2022.12.001. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Things that make you go Hmm: Myths and misconceptions within cognitive-behavioral treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.令人深思的事情:强迫症认知行为治疗中的神话与误解
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2023 Apr;37. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100805. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
8
Exposure to exposure: A protocol for leveraging exposure principles during training to address therapist-level barriers to exposure implementation.暴露疗法的暴露应用:一种在培训期间利用暴露原则来解决治疗师层面暴露实施障碍的方案。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 15;14:1096259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1096259. eCollection 2023.
9
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.认知行为疗法治疗强迫症。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2023 Mar;46(1):167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
10
Clinician Maladaptive Anxious Avoidance in the Context of Implementation of Evidence-Based Interventions: A Commentary.基于证据的干预措施实施背景下临床医生的适应不良性焦虑回避:一篇评论
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jun;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.833214. Epub 2022 Jun 9.