Seebauer Sebastian, Ortner Stefan, Babcicky Philipp, Thaler Thomas
LIFE - Centre for Climate, Energy and Society Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Graz Austria.
Department of Geography University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.
J Flood Risk Manag. 2019 Sep;12(3):e12468. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12468. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
The recent shift to individualisation of flood risk calls for a stronger involvement of private actors. Bottom-up citizen initiatives (BUIs) may bring together governmental bodies with people at risk. Drawing on a screening of existing BUIs in Europe, North America, and Australia and an in-depth analysis of three study sites, this paper maps BUI activities to stages in the risk management cycle and discusses the institutional, relational and social proximity between BUIs and other stakeholders. Flood BUIs often take over roles that the authorities are not willing or able to fulfil. BUIs emerge out of frustration with current risk policies, after a catastrophic flood event, government-initiated engagement projects or targeted funding opportunities. BUIs can take different forms, ranging from oppositional pressure groups, self-help movements for disaster response and recovery, to initiatives formally installed by law. While self-organised BUIs benefit from high proximity to their home communities, formalised BUIs are deeper embedded in existing institutional structures. In order to gain a stronger voice in the risk debate, BUIs need to expand from the local level to catchment areas and exchange expertise and resources in nationwide or cross-border networks. However, BUIs may create parallel political structures that are not democratically legitimised.
近期向洪水风险个性化的转变要求私营部门更强有力地参与进来。自下而上的公民倡议(BUIs)可能会使政府机构与受风险影响的民众走到一起。通过筛选欧洲、北美和澳大利亚现有的公民倡议,并对三个研究地点进行深入分析,本文将公民倡议活动对应到风险管理周期的各个阶段,并讨论了公民倡议与其他利益相关者之间的制度、关系和社会亲近度。洪水公民倡议常常承担起当局不愿或无法履行的职责。公民倡议产生于在灾难性洪水事件、政府发起的参与项目或有针对性的资金机会之后,对当前风险政策的失望。公民倡议可以采取不同形式,从对立压力团体、灾难应对和恢复的自助运动,到依法正式设立的倡议。虽然自发组织的公民倡议受益于与本地社区的高度亲近,但正规化的公民倡议则更深地融入现有制度结构之中。为了在风险辩论中获得更强有力的发言权,公民倡议需要从地方层面扩展到集水区,并在全国性或跨境网络中交流专业知识和资源。然而,公民倡议可能会创建未经民主合法化的平行政治结构。