• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自下而上的公民倡议作为洪水风险管理中的新兴行为体:梳理角色、关系与局限

Bottom-up citizen initiatives as emergent actors in flood risk management: Mapping roles, relations and limitations.

作者信息

Seebauer Sebastian, Ortner Stefan, Babcicky Philipp, Thaler Thomas

机构信息

LIFE - Centre for Climate, Energy and Society Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Graz Austria.

Department of Geography University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.

出版信息

J Flood Risk Manag. 2019 Sep;12(3):e12468. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12468. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1111/jfr3.12468
PMID:32051691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7003449/
Abstract

The recent shift to individualisation of flood risk calls for a stronger involvement of private actors. Bottom-up citizen initiatives (BUIs) may bring together governmental bodies with people at risk. Drawing on a screening of existing BUIs in Europe, North America, and Australia and an in-depth analysis of three study sites, this paper maps BUI activities to stages in the risk management cycle and discusses the institutional, relational and social proximity between BUIs and other stakeholders. Flood BUIs often take over roles that the authorities are not willing or able to fulfil. BUIs emerge out of frustration with current risk policies, after a catastrophic flood event, government-initiated engagement projects or targeted funding opportunities. BUIs can take different forms, ranging from oppositional pressure groups, self-help movements for disaster response and recovery, to initiatives formally installed by law. While self-organised BUIs benefit from high proximity to their home communities, formalised BUIs are deeper embedded in existing institutional structures. In order to gain a stronger voice in the risk debate, BUIs need to expand from the local level to catchment areas and exchange expertise and resources in nationwide or cross-border networks. However, BUIs may create parallel political structures that are not democratically legitimised.

摘要

近期向洪水风险个性化的转变要求私营部门更强有力地参与进来。自下而上的公民倡议(BUIs)可能会使政府机构与受风险影响的民众走到一起。通过筛选欧洲、北美和澳大利亚现有的公民倡议,并对三个研究地点进行深入分析,本文将公民倡议活动对应到风险管理周期的各个阶段,并讨论了公民倡议与其他利益相关者之间的制度、关系和社会亲近度。洪水公民倡议常常承担起当局不愿或无法履行的职责。公民倡议产生于在灾难性洪水事件、政府发起的参与项目或有针对性的资金机会之后,对当前风险政策的失望。公民倡议可以采取不同形式,从对立压力团体、灾难应对和恢复的自助运动,到依法正式设立的倡议。虽然自发组织的公民倡议受益于与本地社区的高度亲近,但正规化的公民倡议则更深地融入现有制度结构之中。为了在风险辩论中获得更强有力的发言权,公民倡议需要从地方层面扩展到集水区,并在全国性或跨境网络中交流专业知识和资源。然而,公民倡议可能会创建未经民主合法化的平行政治结构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b4/7003449/c1e25abd1556/JFR3-12-e12468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b4/7003449/c1e25abd1556/JFR3-12-e12468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b4/7003449/c1e25abd1556/JFR3-12-e12468-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Bottom-up citizen initiatives as emergent actors in flood risk management: Mapping roles, relations and limitations.自下而上的公民倡议作为洪水风险管理中的新兴行为体:梳理角色、关系与局限
J Flood Risk Manag. 2019 Sep;12(3):e12468. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12468. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
2
Citizen-sensor-networks to confront government decision-makers: Two lessons from the Netherlands.公民传感网络与政府决策者对峙:来自荷兰的两个教训。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 1;196:234-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.044. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Statistical evidence for the contribution of citizen-led initiatives and projects to the energy transition in Europe.欧洲公民主导的倡议和项目对能源转型的贡献的统计证据。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 2;13(1):1342. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28504-4.
4
5
A cloud based tool for knowledge exchange on local scale flood risk.一种用于本地尺度洪水风险知识交流的基于云的工具。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Sep 15;161:38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
6
Water matters: An assessment of opinion on water management and community engagement in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom.水至关重要:爱尔兰共和国和英国关于水资源管理与社区参与的观点评估
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 3;12(4):e0174957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174957. eCollection 2017.
7
Cross-sector cooperation in health-enhancing physical activity policymaking: more potential than achievements?促进健康的身体活动政策制定中的跨部门合作:潜力大于成果?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Apr 29;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0103-6.
8
Enhancing community preparedness: an inventory and analysis of disaster citizen science activities.增强社区备灾能力:灾害公民科学活动的清单和分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):1356. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7689-x.
9
Health system's barriers hindering implementation of public-private partnership at the district level: a case study of partnership for improved reproductive and child health services provision in Tanzania.卫生系统阻碍地区层面公私伙伴关系实施的障碍:以坦桑尼亚改善生殖和儿童健康服务提供的伙伴关系为例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1831-6.
10
'Contractual' and 'cooperative' civic engagement: The emergence and roles of 'flood action groups' in England and Wales.“契约性”与“合作性”公民参与:英格兰和威尔士“防洪行动小组”的兴起与作用
Ambio. 2015 Sep;44(5):440-51. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0576-x. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study.公众对荷兰四项 COVID-19 非药物干预措施决策的参与偏好:一项调查研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292119. eCollection 2023.
2
Voices of society: the emergence of civil-society practices aiming to engage in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.社会声音:荷兰旨在参与新冠疫情管理的公民社会实践的出现。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Aug;8(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012875.
3
Community Organising Frameworks, Models, and Processes to Improve Health: A Systematic Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring governance learning: How policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning.探索治理学习:政策制定者在设计参与式洪水风险规划时如何借鉴证据、经验和直觉。
Environ Sci Policy. 2016 Jan;55:353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.020.
2
Presenting and evaluating qualitative research.呈现和评估定性研究。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Oct 11;74(8):141. doi: 10.5688/aj7408141.
3
A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation.一个诊断气候变化适应障碍的框架。
社区组织框架、模式和流程以改善健康:系统范围审查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;20(7):5341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20075341.
4
How path dependency manifests in flood risk management: observations from four decades in the Ennstal and Aist catchments in Austria.路径依赖如何在洪水风险管理中体现:来自奥地利恩斯塔尔河和艾斯特河流域四十年的观察。
Reg Environ Change. 2023;23(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s10113-023-02029-y. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Enhancing Local Disaster Management Network through Developing Resilient Community in New Taipei City, Taiwan.通过在台湾新北市发展韧性社区,加强地方灾害管理网络。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 24;17(15):0. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155357.
6
Risk communication and adaptive behaviour in flood-prone areas of Austria: A Q-methodology study on opinions of affected homeowners.洪水多发区的风险沟通和适应行为:受影响房主意见的 Q 方法研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233551. eCollection 2020.
7
Analysis of the Actions and Motivations of a Community during the 2017 Torrential Rains in Northern Kyushu, Japan.日本北九州 2017 年暴雨期间社区行动与动机分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 2;17(7):2424. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072424.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22026-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007887107. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
4
Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management.谁参与其中以及为何参与?自然资源管理中利益相关者分析方法的类型学。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1933-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Feb 20.