Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
J Periodontol. 2020 Oct;91(10):1274-1283. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0457. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Cigarette smoking remains one of the leading public health threats worldwide. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) provide an alternative to conventional cigarette smoking; however, the evidence base of risks and benefits of e-cig use is new and growing. In this cross-sectional pilot study, the effect of e-cig use on biological profiles in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was assessed and compared with the profiles of cigarette smokers (CS), dual users, and non-users. The systemic inflammatory mediators between e-cig users (EC) and these other groups were also assessed.
This pilot cross-sectional study recruited volunteer participants consisting of four groups, non-smokers (NS), CS, EC, and dual EC and cigarette smokers (DS). Saliva and GCF samples were collected and analyzed for biomarkers of inflammation, oxidative stress, anti-inflammatory lipid mediators, tissue injury and repair, and growth factors with immunoassay (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Luminex).
Smoking status was confirmed via salivary cotinine. Prostaglandin E2 level was significantly increased in CS compared with EC and DS, but not significantly different in EC and DS groups compared with non-smokers (NS). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups of EC and NS (myeloperoxidase [MPO], matrix metalloproteinase-9) as well as between DS and EC for biomarkers of inflammatory mediators (receptor for advanced glycation end products [RAGE], MPO, uteroglobin/CC-10); between groups of DS and NS for extracellular newly identified RAGE binding protein and between CS and NS for MPO. No statistically significant differences in biomarkers of immunity (S100A8, S100A9, galectin-3), tissue injury and repair (Serpine1/PAI-1) and growth factors (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, fibroblast growth factors, platelet-derived growth factor-AA, vascular endothelial growth factor, and others) were found between any of groups.
Statistically significant differences in measurable health outcomes were found between different smoking status groups, suggesting that smoking/vaping produces differential effects on oral health.
吸烟仍是全球主要的公共卫生威胁之一。电子烟为传统吸烟提供了替代品;然而,电子烟使用的风险和益处的证据基础是新的且不断发展的。在这项横断面试点研究中,评估了电子烟使用对唾液和龈沟液(GCF)中生物谱的影响,并将其与吸烟者(CS)、双重使用者和非使用者的生物谱进行了比较。还评估了电子烟使用者(EC)与其他组之间的系统炎症介质。
这项试点性横断面研究招募了由四个组别的志愿者参与者组成,包括不吸烟者(NS)、CS、EC 和 EC 和香烟双重使用者(DS)。收集并分析了唾液和 GCF 样本中的炎症、氧化应激、抗炎脂质介质、组织损伤和修复以及生长因子的生物标志物,采用免疫测定法(酶联免疫吸附试验和 Luminex)。
通过唾液可铁宁确认吸烟状况。与 EC 和 DS 相比,CS 中的前列腺素 E2 水平显著升高,但 EC 和 DS 组与非吸烟者(NS)之间没有显著差异。在 EC 和 NS 组之间观察到统计学上显著的差异(髓过氧化物酶 [MPO]、基质金属蛋白酶-9)以及 DS 和 EC 之间的炎症介质生物标志物(晚期糖基化终产物受体 [RAGE]、MPO、尿促球蛋白/CC-10);DS 和 NS 组之间的细胞外新鉴定的 RAGE 结合蛋白以及 CS 和 NS 组之间的 MPO。在免疫生物标志物(S100A8、S100A9、半乳糖凝集素-3)、组织损伤和修复(Serpine1/PAI-1)和生长因子(脑源性神经营养因子、成纤维细胞生长因子、血小板衍生生长因子-AA、血管内皮生长因子等)方面,各组之间未发现统计学上显著差异。
在不同吸烟状态组之间发现了可测量的健康结果存在统计学显著差异,表明吸烟/电子烟对口腔健康产生了不同的影响。