• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从社会资本视角分析电子健康社区的网络结构和医生行为。

Analysis of Network Structure and Doctor Behaviors in E-Health Communities from a Social-Capital Perspective.

机构信息

School of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, No. 1, Dongsan Road, Erxian Bridge, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610059, China.

Chengdu University of Technology, No.1, Dongsan Road, Erxian Bridge, Chenghua District, Chengdu 610059, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 11;17(4):1136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041136.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041136
PMID:32053913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068535/
Abstract

In tandem with internet development and widespread social media use, e-health communities have begun to emerge in recent years. These communities allow doctors to access forums anywhere, anytime, seek or exchange medical information online, find literature, and so on. This is convenient and can solve some problems for doctors while also promoting doctor communication. This study collected and collated 102 doctors in the "Lilac Forum" and used social network tools to quantify the overall network density, centrality, core-periphery structure, and structural hole indicators of doctors' information exchange from a social-capital perspective. The results showed that the frequency of interaction between doctors differed because of differences in the identities and participation of doctors in the e-health community. The density of the doctors' information dissemination network (0.228) and network cohesion (0.610) were relatively high. Thus, the doctors were more closely connected, and information was easily spread. At the same time, doctors with higher professional titles had obvious location characteristics, familiarity and trust, and high levels of reciprocity. They could obtain redundant information in the network and were more likely to influence the behavior of other doctors. This study's findings provide support for improving information exchange among doctors in e-health communities and improving the service levels of the platforms.

摘要

近年来,随着互联网的发展和社交媒体的广泛应用,电子健康社区开始出现。这些社区允许医生随时随地访问论坛,在线寻求或交流医疗信息,查找文献等。这既方便又可以为医生解决一些问题,同时也促进了医生之间的交流。本研究收集并整理了“丁香园”中的 102 位医生,利用社会网络工具,从社会资本的角度量化了医生信息交流的整体网络密度、中心度、核心-边缘结构和结构洞指标。结果表明,由于医生在电子健康社区中的身份和参与度不同,医生之间的互动频率存在差异。医生信息传播网络的密度(0.228)和网络内聚性(0.610)较高。因此,医生之间的联系更加紧密,信息传播也更加容易。同时,职称较高的医生具有明显的位置特征、熟悉度和信任度以及较高的互惠性,他们可以在网络中获得冗余信息,并且更有可能影响其他医生的行为。本研究的结果为改善电子健康社区中医生之间的信息交流以及提高平台的服务水平提供了支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/6889c162ae31/ijerph-17-01136-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/9c9539544968/ijerph-17-01136-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/f7773e2bbbbe/ijerph-17-01136-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/6889c162ae31/ijerph-17-01136-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/9c9539544968/ijerph-17-01136-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/f7773e2bbbbe/ijerph-17-01136-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbbf/7068535/6889c162ae31/ijerph-17-01136-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Network Structure and Doctor Behaviors in E-Health Communities from a Social-Capital Perspective.从社会资本视角分析电子健康社区的网络结构和医生行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 11;17(4):1136. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041136.
2
Effectiveness of Interactive Tools in Online Health Care Communities: Social Exchange Theory Perspective.在线医疗社区中互动工具的有效性:社会交换理论视角。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 12;23(3):e21892. doi: 10.2196/21892.
3
Examining Social Capital, Social Support, and Language Use in an Online Depression Forum: Social Network and Content Analysis.在线抑郁症论坛中的社会资本、社会支持与语言使用研究:社会网络与内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 24;22(6):e17365. doi: 10.2196/17365.
4
Can social capital play a role in contracting services of family doctors in China? Reflections based on an integrative review.社会资本能否在中国家庭医生签约服务中发挥作用?基于综合评价的思考。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01431-x.
5
Effect of Prosocial Behaviors on e-Consultations in a Web-Based Health Care Community: Panel Data Analysis.亲社会行为对基于网络的医疗社区中电子会诊的影响:面板数据分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 25;26:e52646. doi: 10.2196/52646.
6
How doctors view and use social media: a national survey.医生如何看待和使用社交媒体:一项全国性调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 2;16(12):e267. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3589.
7
Seeking and using intention of health information from doctors in social media: The effect of doctor-consumer interaction.从社交媒体中的医生处寻求和使用健康信息的意图:医患互动的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jul;115:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Impact of Communicating With Doctors Via Social Media on Consumers' E-Health Literacy and Healthy Behaviors in China.社交媒体与医生沟通对中国消费者电子健康素养和健康行为的影响。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020971188. doi: 10.1177/0046958020971188.
9
Predictors of Patients' Loyalty Toward Doctors on Web-Based Health Communities: Cross-Sectional Study.基于网络健康社区的患者对医生忠诚度的预测因素:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 3;21(9):e14484. doi: 10.2196/14484.
10
Diabetes self-management in online health communities: an information exchange perspective.在线健康社区中的糖尿病自我管理:信息交流视角
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01561-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Study of Factors Influencing the Volume of Responses to Posts in Physician Online Community.一项关于影响医生在线社区帖子回复量的因素的研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;11(9):1275. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091275.
2
Association of social capital with self-perceived eHealth literacy among community-dwelling older people: Age and gender differences.社会资本与社区居住老年人自我感知的电子健康素养之间的关联:年龄和性别差异。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;11:1088863. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1088863. eCollection 2023.
3
Online health community for change: Analysis of self-disclosure and social networks of users with depression.

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptance of Online Medical Websites: An Empirical Study in China.接受在线医疗网站:中国的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 15;16(6):943. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16060943.
2
When Biology Gets Personal: Hidden Challenges of Privacy and Ethics in Biological Big Data.当生物学涉及个人隐私:生物大数据中隐私与伦理的潜在挑战。
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2019;24:386-390.
3
Social Network Analysis and Resilience in University Students: An Approach from Cohesiveness.社交网络分析与大学生韧性:从内聚性角度的探讨
促进改变的在线健康社区:对抑郁症患者自我表露及社交网络的分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 28;14:1092884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092884. eCollection 2023.
4
Network approaches and interventions in healthcare settings: A systematic scoping review.网络方法和干预措施在医疗保健环境中的应用:系统范围界定综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0282050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282050. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient's behavior of selection physician in online health communities: Based on an Elaboration likelihood model.患者在在线健康社区中选择医生的行为:基于精细加工可能性模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;10:986933. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.986933. eCollection 2022.
6
Study on the Relationships between Doctor Characteristics and Online Consultation Volume in the Online Medical Community.在线医疗社区中医生特征与在线咨询量之间的关系研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 16;10(8):1551. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081551.
7
Exploring the User Interaction Network in an Anxiety Disorder Online Community: An Exponential Random Graph Model with Topical and Emotional Effects.探索焦虑障碍在线社区中的用户交互网络:具有主题和情感效应的指数随机图模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 24;19(11):6354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116354.
8
Analysis of the Evolution of User Emotion and Opinion Leaders' Information Dissemination Behavior in the Knowledge Q&A Community during COVID-19.分析 COVID-19 期间知识问答社区中用户情绪和意见领袖信息传播行为的演变。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22):12252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212252.
9
Exploring the Expression Differences Between Professionals and Laypeople Toward the COVID-19 Vaccine: Text Mining Approach.探究专业人员和非专业人员对新冠病毒疫苗的表达差异:文本挖掘方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e30715. doi: 10.2196/30715.
10
Special Issue on E-Health Services.电子健康服务特刊
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):2885. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082885.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 26;15(10):2119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102119.
4
Differences in the Perception of Social Support Among Rural Area Seniors-A Cross-Sectional Survey of Polish Population.农村老年人社会支持感知差异的研究——波兰人群的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 19;15(6):1288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061288.
5
Travelling companions: a story told by a patient and her doctor.旅伴:一位患者与她的医生讲述的故事。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jun;68(671):282. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X696425.
6
Social Networks and Health: Understanding the Nuances of Healthcare Access between Urban and Rural Populations.社交网络与健康:理解城乡人口间医疗保健可及性的细微差别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 13;15(5):973. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050973.
7
A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months.澳大利亚一项直接面向患者的远程医疗堕胎服务:对前18个月的回顾性分析。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jun;58(3):335-340. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12800. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Medical communication: the views of simulated patients.医学交流:模拟患者的观点。
Med Educ. 2018 Jun;52(6):664-676. doi: 10.1111/medu.13547. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Information-Seeking Behavior: Four Orientations to Cancer Communication.医患关系与信息寻求行为:癌症沟通的四种取向
J Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;33(2):79-87. doi: 10.1177/0825859718759881. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
Hygiene and Health: Who Do Mothers in Vanuatu Communicate with about Health?卫生与健康:瓦努阿图的母亲会与谁交流健康问题?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 3;15(3):443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030443.