Broberg Ellen, Andreasson Jesper, Fakhro Mohammed, Olin Anna-Carin, Wagner Darcy, Hyllén Snejana, Lindstedt Sandra
Dept of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Feb 10;6(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00198-2019. eCollection 2020 Jan.
In this cohort study, we evaluated whether the particles in exhaled air (PExA) device can be used in conjunction with mechanical ventilation during surgery. The PExA device consists of an optical particle counter and an impactor that collects particles in exhaled air. Our aim was to establish the feasibility of the PExA device in combination with mechanical ventilation (MV) during surgery and if collected particles could be analysed. Patients with and without nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lung surgery were compared to normal breathing (NB) patients with NSCLC.
A total of 32 patients were included, 17 patients with NSCLC (MV-NSCLC), nine patients without NSCLC (MV-C) and six patients with NSCLC and not intubated (NB). The PEx samples were analysed for the most common phospholipids in surfactant using liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry (LCMS).
MV-NSCLC and MV-C had significantly lower numbers of particles exhaled per minute (particle flow rate; PFR) compared to NB. MV-NSCLC and MV-C also had a siginificantly lower amount of phospholipids in PEx when compared to NB. MV-NSCLC had a significantly lower amount of surfactant A compared to NB.
We have established the feasibility of the PExA device. Particles could be collected and analysed. We observed lower PFR from MV compared to NB. High PFR during MV may be due to more frequent opening and closing of the airways, known to be harmful to the lung. Online use of the PExA device might be used to monitor and personalise settings for mechanical ventilation to lower the risk of lung damage.
在这项队列研究中,我们评估了呼出空气颗粒(PExA)装置在手术期间是否可与机械通气联合使用。PExA装置由一个光学颗粒计数器和一个收集呼出空气中颗粒的撞击器组成。我们的目的是确定PExA装置在手术期间与机械通气(MV)联合使用的可行性,以及收集的颗粒是否可以进行分析。将接受肺手术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者和非NSCLC患者与正常呼吸(NB)的NSCLC患者进行比较。
共纳入32例患者,17例NSCLC患者(MV-NSCLC),9例非NSCLC患者(MV-C)和6例未插管的NSCLC患者(NB)。使用液相色谱-质谱联用(LCMS)分析PEx样本中表面活性剂中最常见的磷脂。
与NB相比,MV-NSCLC和MV-C每分钟呼出的颗粒数(颗粒流速;PFR)显著更低。与NB相比,MV-NSCLC和MV-C的PEx中磷脂含量也显著更低。与NB相比,MV-NSCLC的表面活性剂A含量显著更低。
我们已经确定了PExA装置的可行性。颗粒可以被收集和分析。我们观察到与NB相比,MV时的PFR更低。MV期间高PFR可能是由于气道更频繁地开合,已知这对肺有害。在线使用PExA装置可能用于监测和个性化设置机械通气以降低肺损伤风险。