Suppr超能文献

一种通过使用Pexa方法在体内以及在脑死亡后器官捐献肺移植的体外肺灌注期间测量气道颗粒流来监测机械通气的新方法。

A new way of monitoring mechanical ventilation by measurement of particle flow from the airways using Pexa method in vivo and during ex vivo lung perfusion in DCD lung transplantation.

作者信息

Broberg Ellen, Wlosinska Martiné, Algotsson Lars, Olin Anna-Carin, Wagner Darcy, Pierre Leif, Lindstedt Sandra

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Jul 27;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40635-018-0188-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different mechanical ventilation settings are known to affect lung preservation for lung transplantation. Measurement of particle flow in exhaled air may allow online assessment of the impact of ventilation before changes in the tissue can be observed. We hypothesized that by analyzing the particle flow, we could understand the impact of different ventilation parameters.

METHODS

Particle flow was monitored in vivo, post mortem, and in ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) in six porcines with the Pexa (particles in exhaled air) instrument. Volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) were used to compare small versus large tidal volumes. The surfactant lipids dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) were quantified by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

In vivo the particle mass in VCV was significantly lower than in VCV (p = 0.0186), and the particle mass was significantly higher in PCV than in VCV (p = 0.0322). In EVLP, the particle mass in VCV was significantly higher than in PCV (p = 0.0371), and the particle mass was significantly higher in PCV than in PCV (p = 0.0127). DPPC was significantly higher in EVLP than in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we introduce a new method for measuring particle flow during mechanical ventilation and confirm that these particles can be collected and analyzed. VCV resulted in a lower particle flow in vivo but not in EVLP. In all settings, large tidal volumes resulted in increased particle flow. We found that DPPC was significantly increased comparing in vivo with EVLP. This technology may be useful for developing strategies to preserve the lung and has a high potential to detect biomarkers.

摘要

背景

已知不同的机械通气设置会影响肺移植中的肺保存。测量呼出空气中的颗粒流可能有助于在观察到组织变化之前在线评估通气的影响。我们假设通过分析颗粒流,能够了解不同通气参数的影响。

方法

使用Pexa(呼出空气中的颗粒)仪器在6头猪的体内、死后及离体肺灌注(EVLP)过程中监测颗粒流。采用容量控制通气(VCV)和压力控制通气(PCV)来比较小潮气量与大潮气量。通过质谱法定量表面活性物质脂质二棕榈酰磷脂酰胆碱(DPPC)和磷脂酰胆碱(PC)。

结果

在体内,VCV中的颗粒质量显著低于PCV(p = 0.0186),且PCV中的颗粒质量显著高于VCV(p = 0.0322)。在EVLP中,VCV中的颗粒质量显著高于PCV(p = 0.0371),且PCV中的颗粒质量显著高于PCV(p = 0.0127)。EVLP中的DPPC显著高于体内。

结论

在此,我们介绍了一种在机械通气期间测量颗粒流的新方法,并证实这些颗粒可以被收集和分析。VCV在体内导致较低的颗粒流,但在EVLP中并非如此。在所有设置中,大潮气量导致颗粒流增加。我们发现与体内相比,EVLP中的DPPC显著增加。这项技术可能有助于制定肺保存策略,并且在检测生物标志物方面具有很高的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2bd/6063805/cfdc0f8be714/40635_2018_188_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验