Hallgren Filip, Stenlo Martin, Niroomand Anna, Broberg Ellen, Hyllén Snejana, Malmsjö Malin, Lindstedt Sandra
Dept of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Jul 26;7(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00961-2020. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Mechanical ventilation can be monitored by analysing particles in exhaled air as measured by particle flow rate (PFR). This could be a potential method of detecting ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) before changes in conventional parameters can be detected. The aim of this study was to investigate PFR during different ventilation modes in patients without lung pathology.
A prospective study was conducted on patients on mechanical ventilation in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU). A PExA 2.0 device was connected to the expiratory limb on the ventilator for continuous measurement of PFR in 30 patients randomised to either volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) for 30 min including a recruitment manoeuvre. PFR measurements were continued as the patients were transitioned to pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) and then pressure support ventilation (PSV) until extubation.
PRVC resulted in significantly lower PFR, while those on PSV had the highest PFR. The distribution of particles differed significantly between the different ventilation modes.
Measuring PFR is safe after cardiac surgery in the ICU and may constitute a novel method of continuously monitoring the small airways in real time. A low PFR during mechanical ventilation may correlate to a gentle ventilation strategy. PFR increases as the patient transitions from controlled mechanical ventilation to autonomous breathing, which most likely occurs as recruitment by the diaphragm opens up more distal airways. Different ventilation modes resulted in unique particle patterns and could be used as a fingerprint for the different ventilation modes.
通过分析呼气中的颗粒(以颗粒流速(PFR)测量)可对机械通气进行监测。这可能是一种在传统参数发生变化之前检测呼吸机诱发肺损伤(VILI)的潜在方法。本研究的目的是调查无肺部病变患者在不同通气模式下的PFR。
对心胸重症监护病房(ICU)中接受机械通气的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。将一台PExA 2.0设备连接到呼吸机的呼气端,对30例随机分为容量控制通气(VCV)或压力控制通气(PCV)的患者连续测量PFR 30分钟,包括一次肺复张手法。随着患者转换为压力调节容量控制(PRVC),然后是压力支持通气(PSV)直至拔管,持续进行PFR测量。
PRVC导致PFR显著降低,而接受PSV的患者PFR最高。不同通气模式下颗粒的分布有显著差异。
在ICU心脏手术后测量PFR是安全的,可能构成一种实时连续监测小气道的新方法。机械通气期间低PFR可能与温和的通气策略相关。随着患者从控制机械通气过渡到自主呼吸,PFR升高,这很可能是由于膈肌的复张打开了更多远端气道。不同的通气模式导致独特的颗粒模式,可作为不同通气模式的特征标记。