• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络发布的选择性:隐私担忧、社会资本和技术素养的作用。

Selectivity in posting on social networks: the role of privacy concerns, social capital, and technical literacy.

作者信息

Schwartz-Chassidim Hadas, Ayalon Oshrat, Mendel Tamir, Hirschprung Ron, Toch Eran

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Software Engineering Department, Shamoon College of Engineering, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Feb 4;6(2):e03298. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03298. eCollection 2020 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03298
PMID:32055733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7005435/
Abstract

People's posting behaviors in social networks was perceived as ambiguous, with concerns misaligned with people's public postings. To address this gap, we suggest a model that offers new insights into the relationship between perceptions and actual behaviors. We define a quantitative marker for agility, the frequency in which people update their audience selection when posting information in online social networks, and evaluate the factors that contribute to the variability of agility between different users. We analyzed the posting behavior of Facebook 181 participants, as well as their answers to open and close questions. We find that frequent changes in privacy settings are correlated with high social privacy and with institutional privacy concerns, whereas social concerns were found to be more prominent. Agility was negatively correlated with low public sharing. Our findings show that users use privacy settings to effectively mitigate privacy concerns and desires for creating and strengthening social connections. We discuss how agility can be used to design and to evaluate new user interfaces for managing privacy in social settings.

摘要

人们在社交网络中的发布行为被认为具有模糊性,人们的担忧与公开帖子不一致。为了弥补这一差距,我们提出了一个模型,该模型为认知与实际行为之间的关系提供了新的见解。我们定义了一个敏捷性的定量指标,即人们在在线社交网络中发布信息时更新受众选择的频率,并评估导致不同用户之间敏捷性差异的因素。我们分析了181名Facebook参与者的发布行为,以及他们对开放式和封闭式问题的回答。我们发现,隐私设置的频繁变化与较高的社交隐私和机构隐私担忧相关,而社交担忧更为突出。敏捷性与低公开分享呈负相关。我们的研究结果表明,用户使用隐私设置来有效减轻隐私担忧以及建立和加强社交联系的愿望。我们讨论了如何利用敏捷性来设计和评估用于管理社交环境中隐私的新用户界面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8097/7005435/bd336ca6ea05/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8097/7005435/bd336ca6ea05/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8097/7005435/bd336ca6ea05/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Selectivity in posting on social networks: the role of privacy concerns, social capital, and technical literacy.社交网络发布的选择性:隐私担忧、社会资本和技术素养的作用。
Heliyon. 2020 Feb 4;6(2):e03298. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03298. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Do Online Privacy Concerns Predict Selfie Behavior among Adolescents, Young Adults and Adults?对在线隐私的担忧能否预测青少年、年轻人和成年人的自拍行为?
Front Psychol. 2017 May 23;8:815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00815. eCollection 2017.
3
Public Concern About Monitoring Twitter Users and Their Conversations to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Survey Study.公众对监测推特用户及其对话以招募临床试验参与者的关注:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 30;21(10):e15455. doi: 10.2196/15455.
4
Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, Internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters.谁会进行虚拟身份自杀?Facebook 用户和退出者在隐私关注、网络成瘾和个性方面的差异。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Sep;16(9):629-34. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0323. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
5
People's political views, perceived social norms, and individualism shape their privacy concerns for and acceptance of pandemic control measures that use individual-level georeferenced data.人们的政治观点、感知到的社会规范和个人主义,塑造了他们对使用个人层面地理位置数据的疫情防控措施的隐私关注和接受程度。
Int J Health Geogr. 2023 Dec 6;22(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12942-023-00354-3.
6
Predicting user concerns about online privacy in Hong Kong.预测香港用户对网络隐私的担忧。
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Dec;11(6):779-81. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0252.
7
Information privacy behavior in the use of Facebook apps: A personality-based vulnerability assessment.使用Facebook应用程序时的信息隐私行为:基于个性的脆弱性评估。
Heliyon. 2020 Aug 20;6(8):e04714. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04714. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Exploring mobile health in a private online social network.在私人在线社交网络中探索移动健康。
Int J Electron Healthc. 2015;8(1):51-75. doi: 10.1504/ijeh.2015.071643.
9
What's on YOUR Facebook profile? Evaluation of an educational intervention to promote appropriate use of privacy settings by medical students on social networking sites.你的脸书个人资料上有什么?一项关于促进医学生在社交网站上合理使用隐私设置的教育干预措施的评估。
Med Educ Online. 2015 Jul 20;20:28708. doi: 10.3402/meo.v20.28708. eCollection 2015.
10
Will you accept the government's friend request? Social networks and privacy concerns.你会接受政府的好友请求吗?社交网络和隐私问题。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e80682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080682. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Victim Self-Disclosure on Bystander Intervention in Cyberbullying.受害者自我披露对网络欺凌中旁观者干预的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;13(10):829. doi: 10.3390/bs13100829.
2
The users' point of view: towards a model of government information behavior on social media.用户视角:构建社交媒体上的政府信息行为模型
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 12;8(8):e10146. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10146. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Does quality stimulate customer satisfaction where perceived value mediates and the usage of social media moderates?

本文引用的文献

1
Privacy Concerns and Self-Disclosure in Private and Public Uses of Social Media.社交媒体的私人和公共使用中的隐私问题和自我披露。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Jul;21(7):418-428. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0709.
2
Who Are the Turkers? A Characterization of MTurk Workers Using the Personality Assessment Inventory.《土耳其工人是谁?使用人格评估量表对 MTurk 工人的特征描述》
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):759-766. doi: 10.1177/1073191118760709. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias.
在感知价值起中介作用且社交媒体使用起调节作用的情况下,质量是否会刺激顾客满意度?
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 15;6(12):e05710. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05710. eCollection 2020 Dec.
谎言、该死的谎言与调查自我报告?身份认同作为测量偏差的一个原因。
Soc Psychol Q. 2016 Dec;79(4):333-354. doi: 10.1177/0190272516628298. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Privacy and human behavior in the age of information.信息时代的隐私与人类行为
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):509-14. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1465.
5
Couldn't or wouldn't? The influence of privacy concerns and self-efficacy in privacy management on privacy protection.无法或不愿?隐私关注和隐私管理自我效能对隐私保护的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jan;18(1):13-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0456.
6
Predicting Facebook users' online privacy protection: risk, trust, norm focus theory, and the theory of planned behavior.预测 Facebook 用户的在线隐私保护:风险、信任、规范焦点理论和计划行为理论。
J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul-Aug;154(4):352-69. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.914881.