• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机效应荟萃分析中使用汇总数据与个体数据的相对效率。

Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random-effects meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Social Work & Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Department of Statistics, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/biom.13238. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13238
PMID:32056197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7955582/
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a statistical methodology for combining information from diverse sources so that a more reliable and efficient conclusion can be reached. It can be conducted by either synthesizing study-level summary statistics or drawing inference from an overarching model for individual participant data (IPD) if available. The latter is often viewed as the "gold standard." For random-effects models, however, it remains not fully understood whether the use of IPD indeed gains efficiency over summary statistics. In this paper, we examine the relative efficiency of the two methods under a general likelihood inference setting. We show theoretically and numerically that summary-statistics-based analysis is at most as efficient as IPD analysis, provided that the random effects follow the Gaussian distribution, and maximum likelihood estimation is used to obtain summary statistics. More specifically, (i) the two methods are equivalent in an asymptotic sense; and (ii) summary-statistics-based inference can incur an appreciable loss of efficiency if the sample sizes are not sufficiently large. Our results are established under the assumption that the between-study heterogeneity parameter remains constant regardless of the sample sizes, which is different from a previous study. Our findings are confirmed by the analyses of simulated data sets and a real-world study of alcohol interventions.

摘要

荟萃分析是一种将不同来源的信息综合起来以得出更可靠和有效的结论的统计方法。它可以通过综合研究水平的汇总统计数据或从可用的个体参与者数据(IPD)的总体模型中进行推断来进行。后者通常被视为“金标准”。然而,对于随机效应模型,仍然不完全清楚使用 IPD 是否确实比汇总统计数据更有效率。在本文中,我们在一般似然推理设置下检查了这两种方法的相对效率。我们从理论和数值上表明,只要随机效应服从正态分布并且使用最大似然估计来获取汇总统计数据,基于汇总统计数据的分析最多与 IPD 分析一样有效。更具体地说,(i)在渐近意义上,这两种方法是等效的;(ii)如果样本量不够大,基于汇总统计数据的推断可能会导致效率的显著损失。我们的结果是在假设研究间异质性参数保持不变而与样本量无关的情况下得出的,这与之前的一项研究不同。我们的发现通过对模拟数据集和酒精干预的实际研究的分析得到了证实。

相似文献

1
Relative efficiency of using summary versus individual data in random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析中使用汇总数据与个体数据的相对效率。
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/biom.13238. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
2
Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Heterogeneous Studies Using Only Summary Statistics: Efficiency and Robustness.仅使用汇总统计量对异质性研究进行多变量Meta分析:效率与稳健性
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(509):326-340. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.899235.
3
The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.采用个体参与者数据与汇总数据进行的荟萃分析的相对益处。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Jun;14(2):165-76. doi: 10.1037/a0015565.
4
One-stage random effects meta-analysis using linear mixed models for aggregate continuous outcome data.使用线性混合模型对综合连续结局数据进行单阶段随机效应荟萃分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Sep;10(3):360-375. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1331. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Systematic review of methods for individual patient data meta- analysis with binary outcomes.二元结局个体患者数据荟萃分析方法的系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jun 19;14:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-79.
6
Efficient two-step multivariate random effects meta-analysis of individual participant data for longitudinal clinical trials using mixed effects models.高效两步法多元随机效应个体参与者数据纵向临床试验混合效应模型荟萃分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0676-1.
7
Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.使用个体参与者数据的Meta分析:单阶段和两阶段方法及其差异原因。
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 28;36(5):855-875. doi: 10.1002/sim.7141. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
8
Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.使用个体患者数据对一步法和两步法Meta分析模型进行比较。
Biom J. 2010 Apr;52(2):271-87. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900143.
9
Meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: Using pseudo IPD created from aggregate data to adjust for baseline imbalance and assess treatment-by-baseline modification.连续结局的荟萃分析:使用从汇总数据中创建的伪个体数据来调整基线不平衡并评估治疗-基线交互作用。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Nov;11(6):780-794. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1434. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
10
Efficient integration of aggregate data and individual participant data in one-way mixed models.在单向混合模型中高效整合汇总数据和个体参与者数据。
Stat Med. 2022 Apr 30;41(9):1555-1572. doi: 10.1002/sim.9307. Epub 2022 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Bivariate Finite Mixture Random Effects Model for Identifying and Accommodating Outliers in Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-Analyses.一种用于诊断试验准确性荟萃分析中识别和处理异常值的双变量有限混合随机效应模型。
Biom J. 2025 Jun;67(3):e70062. doi: 10.1002/bimj.70062.
2
Racial residential segregation is associated with ambient air pollution exposure after adjustment for multilevel sociodemographic factors: Evidence from eight US-based cohorts.在对多层次社会人口因素进行调整后,种族居住隔离与环境空气污染暴露相关:来自美国八个队列的证据。
Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 20;9(1):e367. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000367. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
HostSeq: a Canadian whole genome sequencing and clinical data resource.宿主序列:加拿大全基因组测序和临床数据资源。
BMC Genom Data. 2023 May 2;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12863-023-01128-3.
4
Which is Better for Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Zero-Inflated Count Outcomes, One-Step or Two-Step Analysis? A Simulation Study.零膨胀计数结局的个体参与者数据荟萃分析中,一步法和两步法哪个更好?一项模拟研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1090-1105. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2023.2173135. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
A bias correction method in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with no adjustments for zero-inflated outcomes.Meta 分析中对零膨胀结局未调整的随机临床试验的偏倚校正方法。
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 20;40(26):5894-5909. doi: 10.1002/sim.9161. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
6
Effects  of rural-urban residence and education on intimate partner violence among women in Sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of health survey data.城乡居住和教育对撒哈拉以南非洲妇女亲密伴侣暴力的影响:健康调查数据的荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Apr 13;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01286-5.

本文引用的文献

1
A tutorial on individual participant data meta-analysis using Bayesian multilevel modeling to estimate alcohol intervention effects across heterogeneous studies.使用贝叶斯多层次建模对个体参与者数据进行元分析教程,以估计跨异质研究的酒精干预效果。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jul;94:162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.一阶段与两阶段个体患者数据荟萃分析方法的比较:一项模拟研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Sep;9(3):417-430. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1303. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.使用个体参与者数据的Meta分析:单阶段和两阶段方法及其差异原因。
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 28;36(5):855-875. doi: 10.1002/sim.7141. Epub 2016 Oct 16.
4
Analyzing Big Data in Psychology: A Split/Analyze/Meta-Analyze Approach.心理学中的大数据分析:一种拆分/分析/元分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 23;7:738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00738. eCollection 2016.
5
On random-effects meta-analysis.在随机效应荟萃分析中。
Biometrika. 2015 Jun;102(2):281-294. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asv011. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
6
Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Heterogeneous Studies Using Only Summary Statistics: Efficiency and Robustness.仅使用汇总统计量对异质性研究进行多变量Meta分析:效率与稳健性
J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(509):326-340. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.899235.
7
On the relative efficiency of using summary statistics versus individual-level data in meta-analysis.关于在荟萃分析中使用汇总统计量与个体水平数据的相对效率。
Biometrika. 2010 Jun;97(2):321-332. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq006. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
8
Flexibly modeling the baseline risk in meta-analysis.灵活建模荟萃分析中的基线风险。
Stat Med. 2013 Jan 15;32(1):40-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.5506. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
9
Modelling the effect of baseline risk in meta-analysis: a review from the perspective of errors-in-variables regression.从变量误差回归的角度看荟萃分析中基线风险的影响:综述
Stat Methods Med Res. 2013 Jun;22(3):307-23. doi: 10.1177/0962280211412244. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.采用个体参与者数据与汇总数据进行的荟萃分析的相对益处。
Psychol Methods. 2009 Jun;14(2):165-76. doi: 10.1037/a0015565.