• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emotional processing subtypes in bipolar disorder: A cluster analysis.双相障碍的情绪加工亚型:聚类分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.082. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
2
Cognitive deficits in bipolar disorders: Implications for emotion.双相情感障碍中的认知缺陷:对情绪的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;59:126-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
3
Cognitive profiles in euthymic patients with bipolar disorders: results from the FACE-BD cohort.双相情感障碍心境正常患者的认知特征:来自FACE-BD队列的结果
Bipolar Disord. 2017 Mar;19(2):146-153. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12485. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Neurocognitive heterogeneity in young offspring of patients with bipolar disorder: The effect of putative clinical stages.双相障碍患者的年轻后代的神经认知异质性:假定临床阶段的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
Empirical evidence for discrete neurocognitive subgroups in bipolar disorder: clinical implications.双相情感障碍中离散神经认知亚组的实证证据:临床意义。
Psychol Med. 2014 Oct;44(14):3083-96. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000439. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
6
[Neurocognitive function in clinically stable patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder and normal controls].[精神分裂症或双相情感障碍临床稳定患者及正常对照者的神经认知功能]
Psychiatriki. 2011 Jul-Sep;22(3):195-206.
7
Clinical and cognitive factors affecting psychosocial functioning in remitted patients with bipolar disorder.影响双相情感障碍缓解期患者心理社会功能的临床和认知因素。
Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):182-191. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.182.
8
Cognitive Heterogeneity across Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: A Cluster Analysis of Intellectual Trajectories.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的认知异质性:智力轨迹的聚类分析。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Oct;26(9):860-872. doi: 10.1017/S1355617720000442. Epub 2020 May 19.
9
Deconstructing Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia: A cross-diagnostic cluster analysis of cognitive phenotypes.解构双相情感障碍和精神分裂症:认知表型的跨诊断聚类分析
J Affect Disord. 2017 Feb;209:71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
10
Emotion processing and psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolar disorder.心境正常的双相情感障碍中的情绪加工与社会心理功能
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Apr;135(4):339-350. doi: 10.1111/acps.12706. Epub 2017 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in social perception in people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者社会认知的差异。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2023 May 8;33:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2023.100286. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Social cognition and bipolar disorder: pending questions and unexplored topics.社会认知与双相障碍:悬而未决的问题和待探索的领域。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 29;44(6):655-663. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2272.
3
Affective cognition in eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance on the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test.进食障碍中的情感认知:“读心测试”表现的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Oct;27(7):2291-2307. doi: 10.1007/s40519-022-01393-8. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
The Impact of Childhood Trauma on Developing Bipolar Disorder: Current Understanding and Ensuring Continued Progress.童年创伤对双相情感障碍发展的影响:当前认识与确保持续进展
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Dec 14;16:3095-3115. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S285540. eCollection 2020.
5
A Review and a Framework of Variables for Defining and Characterizing Tinnitus Subphenotypes.定义和表征耳鸣亚表型的变量综述及框架
Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 4;10(12):938. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120938.
6
On the difficulties of building therapeutic relationships when wearing face masks.佩戴口罩时建立治疗关系的困难
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Nov;138:110226. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110226. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Oxytocin administration and emotion recognition abilities in adults with a history of childhood adversity.童年逆境经历成人的催产素给药与情绪识别能力。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Jan;99:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.08.025. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
2
Mechanisms of functional improvement through cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia.精神分裂症认知康复功能改善的机制。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jun;101:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Neurocognitive heterogeneity in older adults with bipolar disorders.老年双相情感障碍患者的神经认知异质性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:510-512. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.035. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Early intervention for youth at high risk for bipolar disorder: A multisite randomized trial of family-focused treatment.青少年双相障碍高危人群的早期干预:家庭为中心的治疗多中心随机试验。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;13(2):208-216. doi: 10.1111/eip.12463. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
5
Neurocognitive subtypes in patients with bipolar disorder and their unaffected siblings.双相障碍患者及其未受影响的兄弟姐妹的神经认知亚型。
Psychol Med. 2017 Dec;47(16):2892-2905. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700143X. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
6
Characterizing cognitive heterogeneity on the schizophrenia-bipolar disorder spectrum.描绘精神分裂症-双相情感障碍谱系中的认知异质性。
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(10):1848-1864. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000307. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
Emotion processing and psychosocial functioning in euthymic bipolar disorder.心境正常的双相情感障碍中的情绪加工与社会心理功能
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Apr;135(4):339-350. doi: 10.1111/acps.12706. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
8
Do patients with bipolar disorder and subsyndromal symptoms benefit from functional remediation? A 12-month follow-up study.双相情感障碍及亚综合征症状患者能否从功能修复中获益?一项为期12个月的随访研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017 Apr;27(4):350-359. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
9
Childhood trauma is associated with increased brain responses to emotionally negative as compared with positive faces in patients with psychotic disorders.与精神障碍患者对正面面孔的反应相比,童年创伤与大脑对负面情绪面孔的反应增强有关。
Psychol Med. 2017 Mar;47(4):669-679. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002762. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
The effects of medication and current mood upon facial emotion recognition: findings from a large bipolar disorder cohort study.药物治疗和当前情绪对面部表情识别的影响:一项大型双相情感障碍队列研究的结果。
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Mar;31(3):320-326. doi: 10.1177/0269881116668594. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

双相障碍的情绪加工亚型:聚类分析。

Emotional processing subtypes in bipolar disorder: A cluster analysis.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.

Mood and Psychosis Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.082. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.082
PMID:32056876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8414557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence regarding the performance of Bipolar Disorder patients (BD) on Emotional Processing (EP) is conflicting, suggesting that heterogeneity within this population may exist. It is not completely understood if this impacts on clinical presentation and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 212 BD patients were recruited. Patients underwent MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery as well as a clinical evaluation to detect premorbid traits, comorbidities and clinical features. Performance on each basic emotion on the Emotional Recognition Task (ERT) and Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test were entered into hierarchical cluster analyses in order to determine the number of clusters and to assign subjects to specific clusters. We then compared subgroups on clinical factors and real-world community functioning.

RESULTS

No differences between BD patients as a group and controls were found in EP performance. Two clusters of BD patients were found, one with "intact" performance (71.2%) that performed as healthy controls (HC) and other with "impaired" performance (28.8%) performing worse than HC and schizophrenic patients on basic emotion recognition. Patients in the "impaired group" presented higher rates of childhood trauma, schizotypal traits, lower premorbid IQ and education, poor psychosocial functioning and cognitive performance.

LIMITATIONS

Cross-sectional data which limits our ability to infer directionality of our findings.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest the presence of two subgroups regarding EP performance with unique clinical and neurodevelopmental profiles associated. Next steps will include using these data to identify a homogeneous group of patients to target these disabling symptoms with treatment.

摘要

背景

关于双相情感障碍患者(BD)在情绪处理(EP)方面的表现,证据相互矛盾,这表明该人群中可能存在异质性。目前还不完全清楚这是否会影响临床表现和功能结果。

方法

共招募了 212 名 BD 患者。患者接受了 MATRICS 共识认知电池测试以及临床评估,以检测前驱特质、共病和临床特征。将每个基本情绪在情绪识别任务(ERT)和“读心在眼”测试上的表现输入到层次聚类分析中,以确定聚类的数量,并将患者分配到特定的聚类中。然后,我们比较了临床因素和现实世界社区功能方面的亚组。

结果

BD 患者组和对照组在 EP 表现方面没有差异。发现了两组 BD 患者,一组表现为“正常”(71.2%),表现与健康对照组(HC)相同,另一组表现为“受损”(28.8%),在基本情绪识别方面的表现比 HC 和精神分裂症患者差。“受损组”患者的童年创伤、类精神特质、较低的前驱智商和教育程度、较差的社会心理功能和认知表现发生率较高。

局限性

横断面数据限制了我们推断研究结果方向的能力。

结论

这些结果表明,EP 表现存在两个亚组,具有独特的临床和神经发育特征。下一步将包括使用这些数据来识别一个同质的患者群体,以针对这些致残症状进行治疗。