• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴侣任务对内容和来源记忆的影响。

Effects of a partner's task on memory for content and source.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Nádor u 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary; MTA-ELTE Social Minds Research Group, Izabella u. 46, 1064 Budapest, Hungary.

Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Nádor u 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Cognition. 2020 May;198:104221. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104221. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104221
PMID:32058100
Abstract

Human memories are malleable and often shaped by social interactions. Previous work has demonstrated that not only one's own goals, but also those of a task-partner can facilitate subsequent retrieval of goal-relevant lexical stimuli, known as the Joint Memory Effect (JME). We outline a social-epistemic account of the JME which proposes that this memory enhancement reflects humans' tendency to map out their interaction partners' knowledge states, leading them to cognitively prioritize information relevant to and selectively attended by their partner. This account predicts that the memory enhancement for partner-relevant words should be limited to contexts where task partners are required to process their targets in terms of meaning, instead of attending to a surface feature. Additionally, we predicted that facilitated recall performance for partner-relevant information would be accompanied by enhanced memory for the social context of that information, that is, participants should be able to link the remembered content to the agent acting on it. The results of four experiments support these predictions. We demonstrate that the JME emerges selectively, depending on which stimulus feature (word meaning or presentation color) is attended by the partner, and that it extends to (and may even depend on) memory for the social context of the targets. Prioritizing partner-relevant information in memory may be linked to processes involved in establishing and monitoring common ground.

摘要

人类的记忆是可塑的,并且经常受到社交互动的影响。先前的研究表明,不仅一个人的目标,而且任务伙伴的目标也可以促进随后与目标相关的词汇刺激的检索,这被称为联合记忆效应(JME)。我们概述了 JME 的社会认识论解释,该解释提出这种记忆增强反映了人类倾向于描绘出他们的互动伙伴的知识状态,从而使他们在认知上优先考虑与其伙伴相关的和有选择地关注的信息。该解释预测,对伙伴相关单词的记忆增强应该仅限于需要根据意义处理目标的任务伙伴的上下文,而不是关注表面特征。此外,我们预测,对伙伴相关信息的促进回忆表现将伴随着对该信息的社会背景的增强记忆,也就是说,参与者应该能够将记忆内容与对其起作用的主体联系起来。四项实验的结果支持了这些预测。我们证明,JME 是选择性出现的,具体取决于伙伴关注的刺激特征(单词含义还是呈现颜色),并且它扩展到(甚至可能取决于)对目标的社会背景的记忆。在记忆中优先考虑伙伴相关信息可能与建立和监控共同基础相关的过程有关。

相似文献

1
Effects of a partner's task on memory for content and source.伴侣任务对内容和来源记忆的影响。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104221. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104221. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
Sticking together? Re-binding previous other-associated stimuli interferes with self-verification but not partner-verification.黏着在一起?重新绑定先前与其他刺激物相关联的信息会干扰自我验证,但不会干扰伴侣验证。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Oct;210:103167. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103167. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
The Manhattan effect: when relationship commitment fails to promote support for partners' interests.曼哈顿效应:当关系承诺未能促进对伴侣利益的支持时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Apr;106(4):546-70. doi: 10.1037/a0035493.
4
The Joint Action Effect on Memory as a Social Phenomenon: The Role of Cued Attention and Psychological Distance.作为一种社会现象的记忆中的联合行动效应:线索性注意和心理距离的作用。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 5;8:1697. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01697. eCollection 2017.
5
The influences of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories.同伴准确性和同伴记忆能力对社会错误记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Nov;42(8):1225-38. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0443-9.
6
Differential effects of pressure on social contagion of memory.压力对记忆的社会传染的影响存在差异。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Jun;27(2):258-275. doi: 10.1037/xap0000346. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Stealing and sharing memories: Source monitoring biases following collaborative remembering.窃取和分享记忆:合作记忆后的源监测偏差。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104656. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104656. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Social influences on unconscious plagiarism and anti-plagiarism.社会对无意识抄袭和反抄袭行为的影响。
Memory. 2016 Aug;24(7):884-902. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1059857. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
9
When two heads are not better than one: partner neglect in paired memory tasks.当两个脑袋并不比一个强时:配对记忆任务中的同伴忽视
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):88-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03194033.
10
Your words are my words: effects of acting together on encoding.你所说即我所说:共同行动对编码的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(5):1026-34. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.725058. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Preserved social facilitation and preferential processing of partner-relevant information in Huntington's disease.亨廷顿病中社交促进作用的保留及对伴侣相关信息的优先处理
Brain Commun. 2024 Dec 19;7(1):fcae462. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae462. eCollection 2025.
2
The joint memory effect: challenging the selfish stigma in Huntington's disease?联合记忆效应:对亨廷顿舞蹈症中自私污名的挑战?
Brain Commun. 2024 Dec 9;7(1):fcae440. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae440. eCollection 2025.
3
Neuropsychological and social predictors of participation in a deep brain stimulation study of Parkinson's disease and dystonia.
帕金森病和肌张力障碍深部脑刺激研究参与度的神经心理学及社会预测因素
medRxiv. 2024 May 31:2024.05.29.24308133. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.29.24308133.
4
Visual memory of a co-actor's target during joint search.共同搜索中对协作者目标的视觉记忆
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2068-2085. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.