• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同搜索中对协作者目标的视觉记忆

Visual memory of a co-actor's target during joint search.

机构信息

Graduate School of Letters, Kyoto University, Yoshida Hon-Machi, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

Institute for the Future of Human Society, Kyoto University, 46 Yoshida Shimoadachi-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2068-2085. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7
PMID:36976364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10043510/
Abstract

Studies on joint action show that when two actors turn-takingly attend to each other's target that appears one at a time, a partner's target is accumulated in memory. However, in the real world, actors may not be certain that they attend to the same object because multiple objects often appear simultaneously. In this study, we asked participant pairs to search for different targets in parallel from multiple objects and investigated the memory of a partner's target. We employed the contextual cueing paradigm, in which repetitive search forms associative memory between a target and a configuration of distractors that facilitates search. During the learning phase, exemplars of three target categories (i.e., bird, shoe, and tricycle) were presented among unique objects, and participant pairs searched for them. In Experiment 1, it was followed by a memory test about target exemplars. Consequently, the partner's target was better recognized than the target that nobody searched for. In Experiments 2a and 2b, the memory test was replaced with the transfer phase, where one individual from the pair searched for the category that nobody had searched for while the other individual searched for the category the partner had searched for in the learning phase. The transfer phase did not show search facilitation underpinned by associative memory between the partner's target and distractors. These results suggest that when participant pairs search for different targets in parallel, they accumulate the partner's target in memory but may not form its associative memory with the distractors that facilitates its search.

摘要

联合行动研究表明,当两个参与者轮流关注彼此一次出现的目标时,伙伴的目标会在记忆中积累。然而,在现实世界中,参与者可能不确定他们是否在关注同一个物体,因为多个物体通常会同时出现。在这项研究中,我们要求参与者成对从多个物体中同时搜索不同的目标,并调查伙伴目标的记忆。我们采用了语境线索范式,在该范式中,目标和分心物的重复搜索形成了联想记忆,从而促进了搜索。在学习阶段,三个目标类别(即鸟类、鞋子和三轮车)的范例与独特的物体一起呈现,参与者对其进行搜索。在实验 1 中,接下来是关于目标范例的记忆测试。结果表明,伙伴的目标比无人搜索的目标更容易被识别。在实验 2a 和 2b 中,记忆测试被转移阶段取代,在该阶段,一对参与者中的一个人搜索没有人搜索过的类别,而另一个人则搜索在学习阶段中伙伴搜索过的类别。转移阶段并没有显示出伙伴目标与分心物之间的联想记忆支持的搜索促进。这些结果表明,当参与者成对同时搜索不同的目标时,他们会在记忆中积累伙伴的目标,但可能不会形成其与分心物的联想记忆,从而促进其搜索。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/7dded6be9683/426_2023_1819_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/f16178dc1f78/426_2023_1819_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/d65610b74e8c/426_2023_1819_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/1e2ed8b86b44/426_2023_1819_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/b1795c99b0ae/426_2023_1819_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/6258303ba13f/426_2023_1819_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/7dded6be9683/426_2023_1819_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/f16178dc1f78/426_2023_1819_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/d65610b74e8c/426_2023_1819_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/1e2ed8b86b44/426_2023_1819_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/b1795c99b0ae/426_2023_1819_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/6258303ba13f/426_2023_1819_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d269/10043510/7dded6be9683/426_2023_1819_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual memory of a co-actor's target during joint search.共同搜索中对协作者目标的视觉记忆
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2068-2085. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
2
Learning of spatial configurations of a co-actor's attended objects in joint visual search.在联合视觉搜索中了解共同参与者所关注物体的空间配置。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103274. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103274. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
The contextual cueing effect disappears during joint search in preschool children.在学龄前儿童的联合搜索过程中,情境线索效应消失。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Mar;227:105592. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105592. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
4
Contextual cueing in preview search.预览搜索中的情境线索提示
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):2862-2875. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02052-9.
5
Two Trackers Are Better than One: Information about the Co-actor's Actions and Performance Scores Contribute to the Collective Benefit in a Joint Visuospatial Task.两个追踪器优于一个:关于合作参与者的行动和表现分数的信息有助于在联合视觉空间任务中实现集体利益。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 3;8:669. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00669. eCollection 2017.
6
Meaning in learning: Contextual cueing relies on objects' visual features and not on objects' meaning.学习中的意义:情境线索依赖于物体的视觉特征,而非物体的意义。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jan;46(1):58-67. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0745-9.
7
Contextual cueing in co-active visual search: Joint action allows acquisition of task-irrelevant context.共激活视觉搜索中的语境线索:联合行动允许获取与任务无关的语境。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 May;84(4):1114-1129. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02470-x. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
8
Category-specific learning of color, orientation, and position regularities guide visual search.类别特定的颜色、方向和位置规律学习指导视觉搜索。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jun;49(6):907-922. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001098.
9
Co-actors represent each other's task regularity through social statistical learning.共同行动者通过社会统计学习来呈现彼此的任务规律。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105411. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105411. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
10
Attention capture by episodic long-term memory.情节记忆的注意捕获。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104312. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104312. Epub 2020 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
White matter abnormalities in the amputation variant of body integrity dysphoria.肢体完整性障碍截肢变体中的白质异常。
Cortex. 2022 Jun;151:272-280. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.03.011. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
2
Response, rather than target detection, triggers the attentional boost effect in visual search.反应而非目标检测引发视觉搜索中的注意力增强效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Jan;48(1):77-93. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000977.
3
Color me impressed: A partner's target feature captures visual attention.让我印象深刻的是:伴侣的目标特征吸引了视觉注意力。
Cognition. 2022 Mar;220:104989. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104989. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
4
The influence of social context and social connection on visual perceptual processes.社会语境和社会联系对视觉感知过程的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103270. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103270. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
5
Learning of spatial configurations of a co-actor's attended objects in joint visual search.在联合视觉搜索中了解共同参与者所关注物体的空间配置。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Apr;215:103274. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103274. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
Social information rapidly prioritizes overt but not covert attention in a joint spatial cueing task.在联合空间线索任务中,社会信息迅速将外显注意而非内隐注意进行优先排序。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Nov;211:103188. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103188. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Altercentric Cognition: How Others Influence Our Cognitive Processing.离心认知:他人如何影响我们的认知加工。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;24(11):945-959. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
Effects of a partner's task on memory for content and source.伴侣任务对内容和来源记忆的影响。
Cognition. 2020 May;198:104221. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104221. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables.在具备足够检验效能的实验中我们需要纳入多少参与者?一份带有参考表的检验效能分析教程。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):16. doi: 10.5334/joc.72.
10
A new look at joint attention and common knowledge.重新审视共同注意与共同知识。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:260-274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Apr 20.