• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健质量改进以预防住院和提高冠心病患者的护理效果和效率(QUEL):初级保健中为期 24 个月的群组随机对照试验方案。

QUality improvement in primary care to prevent hospitalisations and improve Effectiveness and efficiency of care for people Living with coronary heart disease (QUEL): protocol for a 24-month cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.

机构信息

Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box 154 Westmead, Sydney, NSW, 2154, Australia.

Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01105-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-020-01105-0
PMID:32059641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7020350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, is the leading cause of death and disability globally. A large proportion of mortality occurs in people with prior CHD and effective and scalable strategies are needed to prevent associated deaths and hospitalisations. The aim of this study is to determine if a practice-level collaborative quality improvement program, focused on patients with CHD, reduces the rate of unplanned CVD hospitalisations and major adverse cardiovascular events, and increases the proportion of patients achieving risk factor targets at 24 months.

METHODS

Cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care quality improvement program in 50 primary care practices (n~ 10,000 patients) with 24-month follow-up. Eligible practices will be randomised (1:1) to participate in either the intervention (collaborative quality improvement program) or control (standard care) regimens. Outcomes will be assessed based on randomised allocation, according to intention-to-treat. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with unplanned CVD hospitalisations at 2 years. Secondary outcomes are proportion of patients with major adverse cardiovascular events, proportion of patients who received prescriptions for guideline-recommended medicines, proportion of patients achieving national risk factor targets and proportion with a chronic disease management plan or review. Differences in the proportion of patients who are hospitalised (as well as binary secondary outcomes) will be analysed using log-binomial regression or robust Poisson regression, if necessary.

DISCUSSION

Despite extensive research with surrogate outcomes, to the authors' knowledge, this is the first randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a data-driven collaborative quality improvement intervention on hospitalisations, CVD events and cardiovascular risk amongst patients with CHD in the primary care setting. The use of data linkage for collection of outcomes will enable evaluation of this potentially efficient strategy for improving management of risk and outcomes for people with heart disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) number ACTRN12619001790134 (dated 20th December 2019).

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVD),包括冠心病(CHD)和中风,是全球范围内导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。很大一部分死亡率发生在有既往 CHD 的人群中,因此需要有效的、可扩展的策略来预防相关死亡和住院。本研究旨在确定以 CHD 患者为重点的实践层面合作质量改进计划是否能降低无计划 CVD 住院率和主要心血管不良事件发生率,并提高 24 个月时达到风险因素目标的患者比例。

方法

采用整群随机对照试验(cRCT),对 50 家初级保健实践(n~10000 例患者)进行为期 24 个月的随访,评估初级保健质量改进计划的有效性。符合条件的实践将按 1:1 随机分配参加干预(合作质量改进计划)或对照(标准护理)方案。根据意向治疗,将根据随机分组评估结果。主要结局是 2 年内无计划 CVD 住院患者的比例。次要结局包括主要心血管不良事件的比例、接受指南推荐药物处方的患者比例、达到国家风险因素目标的患者比例以及有慢性疾病管理计划或审查的患者比例。使用对数二项式回归或稳健泊松回归分析(如果必要),对住院患者(以及二进制次要结局)比例的差异进行分析。

讨论

尽管已经进行了广泛的替代结局研究,但据作者所知,这是第一项在初级保健环境中评估基于数据的合作质量改进干预对 CHD 患者住院、CVD 事件和心血管风险的有效性的随机对照试验。使用数据链接收集结局将使评估这种潜在有效的策略成为可能,以改善心脏病患者的风险和结局管理。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册(ANZCTR)编号 ACTRN12619001790134(2019 年 12 月 20 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb6/7020350/704c1112296e/12875_2020_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb6/7020350/704c1112296e/12875_2020_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cb6/7020350/704c1112296e/12875_2020_1105_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
QUality improvement in primary care to prevent hospitalisations and improve Effectiveness and efficiency of care for people Living with coronary heart disease (QUEL): protocol for a 24-month cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.初级保健质量改进以预防住院和提高冠心病患者的护理效果和效率(QUEL):初级保健中为期 24 个月的群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01105-0.
2
Data-driven collaborative QUality improvement in Cardiac Rehabilitation (QUICR) to increase program completion: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.数据驱动的心脏康复协作质量改进(QUICR)以提高项目完成率:一项集群随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03971-3.
3
Rationale and design of a randomized cluster trial to improve guideline-adherence of secondary preventive drugs prescription after coronary artery bypass grafting in China: Measurement and Improvement Studies of Surgical Coronary Revascularization: Secondary Prevention (MISSION-1) Study.一项旨在提高中国冠状动脉旁路移植术后二级预防药物处方指南依从性的随机整群试验的原理与设计:外科冠状动脉血运重建的测量与改善研究:二级预防(MISSION-1)研究
Am Heart J. 2016 Aug;178:9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
Data-driven quality improvement program to prevent hospitalisation and improve care of people living with coronary heart disease: Protocol for a process evaluation.数据驱动的质量改进计划,以预防住院和改善冠心病患者的护理:过程评估方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jul;118:106794. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106794. Epub 2022 May 17.
5
Process evaluation of a data-driven quality improvement program within a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve coronary heart disease management in Australian primary care.基于群组随机对照试验的数据驱动质量改进计划的过程评估,以改善澳大利亚初级保健中的冠心病管理。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0298777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298777. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of a computer-guided, quality improvement program for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary health care: the treatment of cardiovascular risk using electronic decision support cluster-randomized trial.计算机引导的初级卫生保健心血管疾病风险管理质量改进项目的效果:使用电子决策支持进行心血管风险治疗的整群随机试验
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):87-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001235. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
Efficacy of a Guideline-Recommended Risk-Reduction Program to Improve Cardiovascular and Limb Outcomes in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease.指南推荐的降低风险方案对改善外周动脉疾病患者心血管和肢体结局的疗效。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Aug 1;151(8):742-50. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0415.
8
A systematic review and economic evaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events.他汀类药物预防冠状动脉事件的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(14):1-160, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11140.
9
Rationale and design for a cluster randomized quality-improvement trial to increase the uptake of evidence-based therapies for patients at high cardiovascular risk: The BRIDGE-Cardiovascular Prevention trial.BRIDGE-Cardiovascular Prevention 试验:一项旨在提高心血管高危患者采用循证治疗方法比例的群组随机质量改进试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jan;207:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
10
Impact of Sustained Use of a Multifaceted Computerized Quality Improvement Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Australian Primary Health Care.澳大利亚初级卫生保健中持续使用多方面计算机化质量改进干预措施对心血管疾病管理的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 24;6(10):e007093. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007093.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality indicators for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in primary care: A systematic review.基层医疗中心血管疾病一级预防的质量指标:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0312137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312137. eCollection 2024.
2
Data-driven collaborative QUality improvement in Cardiac Rehabilitation (QUICR) to increase program completion: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.数据驱动的心脏康复协作质量改进(QUICR)以提高项目完成率:一项集群随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):302. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03971-3.
3
Process evaluation of a data-driven quality improvement program within a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve coronary heart disease management in Australian primary care.

本文引用的文献

1
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
2
Utilisation of Medicare-funded schemes for people with cardiovascular disease.为心血管疾病患者提供医疗保险资助计划的情况。
Aust J Prim Health. 2017 Oct;23(5):482-488. doi: 10.1071/PY16166.
3
National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016.
基于群组随机对照试验的数据驱动质量改进计划的过程评估,以改善澳大利亚初级保健中的冠心病管理。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 4;19(6):e0298777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298777. eCollection 2024.
4
Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-professional, a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia: a cluster-randomised feasibility trial.NIDUS-professional 培训和支持干预措施对家庭护理人员照顾痴呆症患者的可行性和可接受性:一项整群随机可行性试验。
Age Ageing. 2024 Apr 1;53(4). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae074.
5
Age-Related Variation in the Provision of Primary Care Services and Medication Prescriptions for Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.年龄相关性变化对心血管疾病患者初级保健服务和药物处方的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710761.
6
Data-driven quality improvement program to prevent hospitalisation and improve care of people living with coronary heart disease: Protocol for a process evaluation.数据驱动的质量改进计划,以预防住院和改善冠心病患者的护理:过程评估方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jul;118:106794. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106794. Epub 2022 May 17.
7
Learning from the implementation of a quality improvement intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative analysis of participants views of a CVD preventive care project.从澳大利亚全科医疗中实施质量改进干预措施中学习:对 CVD 预防保健项目参与者观点的定性分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 14;23(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01692-0.
8
Effect of Integrated Nursing Care Based on Medical Alliance Mode on the Prevention and Treatment of Complications and Self-Efficacy of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease after PCI.基于医联体模式的整合护理对 PCI 后冠心病患者并发症预防及自我效能的影响。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 9;2022:7727953. doi: 10.1155/2022/7727953. eCollection 2022.
澳大利亚国家心脏基金会和澳大利亚及新西兰心脏学会:2016 年澳大利亚急性冠状动脉综合征管理临床指南。
Med J Aust. 2016 Aug 1;205(3):128-33. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00368.
4
Perceptions of primary care staff on a regional data quality intervention in Australian general practice: a qualitative study.澳大利亚全科医疗中基层医疗人员对区域数据质量干预措施的看法:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 26;17:50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0445-8.
5
Reducing Premature Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in People With Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: The World Heart Federation Roadmap for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.降低动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病患者的心血管疾病过早发病和死亡风险:世界心脏联盟心血管疾病二级预防路线图
Glob Heart. 2015 Jun;10(2):99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2015.04.003.
6
How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types.如何研究改善干预措施:可能的研究类型简要概述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):325-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003620. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
7
Effect of a computer-guided, quality improvement program for cardiovascular disease risk management in primary health care: the treatment of cardiovascular risk using electronic decision support cluster-randomized trial.计算机引导的初级卫生保健心血管疾病风险管理质量改进项目的效果:使用电子决策支持进行心血管风险治疗的整群随机试验
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):87-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001235. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
One third of hospital costs for atherothrombotic disease are attributable to readmissions: a linked data analysis.动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性疾病的住院费用中有三分之一可归因于再次入院:一项关联数据分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Aug 8;14:338. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-338.
9
A framework to bridge the gaps between evidence-based medicine, health outcomes, and improvement and implementation science.一个弥合循证医学、健康结果以及改进与实施科学之间差距的框架。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 May;10(3):200-2. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001364.
10
Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in Australia: a blueprint for reform.澳大利亚冠心病的二级预防:改革蓝图。
Med J Aust. 2013 Feb 4;198(2):70-1. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11080.