Suppr超能文献

数字正电子发射断层扫描(PET)与高分辨率传统 PET 在癌症患者中的性能比较。

Performance of Digital PET Compared with High-Resolution Conventional PET in Patients with Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands

Technical Medicine Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; and.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2020 Oct;61(10):1448-1454. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.238105. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

Abstract

Recently introduced PET systems using silicon photomultipliers with digital readout (dPET) have an improved timing and spatial resolution, aiming at a better image quality than conventional PET (cPET) systems. We prospectively evaluated the performance of a dPET system in patients with cancer, as compared with high-resolution (HR) cPET imaging. After a single F-FDG injection, 66 patients underwent dPET and cPET imaging in randomized order. We used HR reconstructions (2 × 2 × 2 mm voxels) for both scanners and determined SUV, SUV, lesion-to-background ratio (LBR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and lesion diameter in up to 5 F-FDG-positive lesions per patient. Furthermore, we counted the number of visible and measurable lesions on each PET scan. Two nuclear medicine specialists determined, in a masked manner, the TNM score from both image sets in 30 patients referred for initial staging. For all 66 patients, these specialists separately evaluated image quality (4-point scale) and determined the scan preference. We included 238 lesions that were visible and measurable on both PET scans. For 27 patients, we found 37 additional lesions on dPET (41%) that were unmeasurable ( = 14) or invisible ( = 23) on cPET. Mean (±SD) SUV, SUV LBR, and MTV on cPET were 5.2 ± 3.9, 6.9 ± 5.6, 5.0 ± 3.6, and 2,991 ± 13,251 mm, respectively. On dPET, SUV, SUV, and LBR increased by 24%, 23%, and 27%, respectively ( < 0.001) whereas MTV decreased by 13% ( < 0.001), compared with cPET. Visual analysis showed TNM upstaging with dPET in 13% of the patients (4/30). dPET images also had higher scores for quality ( = 0.003) and were visually preferred in most cases (65%). dPET improved the detection of small lesions, upstaged the disease, and produced images that were visually preferred to those from HR cPET. More studies are necessary to confirm the superior diagnostic performance of dPET. digital PET; conventional PET; FDG PET; lesion detection; cancer imaging.

摘要

最近引入的使用硅光电倍增管和数字读出(dPET)的 PET 系统具有改进的时间和空间分辨率,旨在提供比传统 PET(cPET)系统更好的图像质量。我们前瞻性地评估了 dPET 系统在癌症患者中的性能,与高分辨率(HR)cPET 成像相比。在单次 F-FDG 注射后,66 名患者以随机顺序接受 dPET 和 cPET 成像。我们使用 HR 重建(2×2×2mm 体素)对两台扫描仪进行重建,并确定每位患者最多 5 个 F-FDG 阳性病灶的 SUV、SUV、病灶与背景比(LBR)、代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和病灶直径。此外,我们还统计了每个 PET 扫描中可见和可测量的病灶数量。两位核医学专家以盲法方式在 30 名接受初始分期的患者的两组图像中确定 TNM 评分。对于所有 66 名患者,这两位专家分别用 4 分制评估图像质量,并确定扫描偏好。我们纳入了在两次 PET 扫描中均可见和可测量的 238 个病灶。对于 27 名患者,我们在 dPET 上发现了 37 个额外的病灶(41%),这些病灶在 cPET 上无法测量(=14)或不可见(=23)。cPET 上 SUV、SUV、LBR 和 MTV 的平均值(±SD)分别为 5.2±3.9、6.9±5.6、5.0±3.6 和 2991±13251mm。与 cPET 相比,dPET 上 SUV、SUV 和 LBR 分别增加了 24%、23%和 27%(<0.001),而 MTV 降低了 13%(<0.001)。视觉分析显示,dPET 在 13%的患者(4/30)中 TNM 分期升高。dPET 图像的质量评分也更高(=0.003),并且在大多数情况下(65%)视觉上更受青睐。dPET 提高了对小病灶的检测能力,使疾病分期升高,并生成了视觉上优于 HR cPET 图像的结果。需要更多的研究来证实 dPET 的优越诊断性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验