Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China; Environment Centres, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
School of Environmental and Geographical Sciences, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 15;717:137214. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137214. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
Open-cut coal mining can seriously disturb and reshape natural landscapes which results in a range of impacts on local ecosystems and the services they provide. To address the negative impacts of disturbance, progressive rehabilitation is commonly advocated. However, there is little research focusing on how these impacts affect ecosystem services within mine sites and changes over time. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative impacts of mining disturbance and rehabilitation on ecosystem services through mapping and quantifying changes at multiple spatial and temporal scales. Four ecosystem services including carbon sequestration, air quality regulation, soil conservation and water yield were assessed in 1989, 1997, 2005 and 2013. Disturbance and rehabilitation was mapped using LandTrendr algorithm with Landsat. We mapped spatial patterns and pixel values for each ecosystem service with corresponding model and the landscape changes were analyzed with landscape metrics. In addition, we assessed synergies and trade-offs using Spearman's correlation coefficient for different landscape classes and scales. The results showed that carbon sequestration, air quality regulation and water yield services were both positively and negatively affected by vegetation cover changes due to mined land disturbance and rehabilitation, while soil conservation service were mainly influenced by topographic changes. There were strong interactions between carbon sequestration, air quality regulation and water yield, which were steady among different spatial scales and landscape types. Soil conservation correlations were weak and changed substantially due to differences of spatial scales and landscape types. Although there are limitations associated with data accessibility, this study provides a new research method for mapping impacts of mining on ecosystem services, which offer spatially explicit information for decision-makers and environmental regulators to carry out feasible policies, balancing mining development with ecosystem services provision.
露天采煤会严重干扰和重塑自然景观,对当地生态系统及其提供的服务造成一系列影响。为了应对干扰的负面影响,通常提倡逐步恢复。然而,很少有研究关注这些影响如何影响矿区内的生态系统服务以及随时间的变化。本研究的目的是通过在多个时空尺度上进行制图和量化变化来评估采矿干扰和恢复对生态系统服务的累积影响。在 1989 年、1997 年、2005 年和 2013 年,评估了包括碳固存、空气质量调节、土壤保持和产水量在内的四项生态系统服务。使用 LandTrendr 算法和 Landsat 对干扰和恢复进行了制图。我们使用相应的模型为每个生态系统服务映射空间模式和像素值,并使用景观指标分析景观变化。此外,我们还使用 Spearman 相关系数评估了不同景观类别和尺度之间的协同作用和权衡。结果表明,碳固存、空气质量调节和产水量服务都受到采地干扰和恢复导致的植被覆盖变化的正向和负向影响,而土壤保持服务主要受地形变化的影响。碳固存、空气质量调节和产水量之间存在强烈的相互作用,在不同的空间尺度和景观类型之间保持稳定。土壤保持相关性较弱,由于空间尺度和景观类型的差异,变化很大。尽管数据获取存在局限性,但本研究为测绘采矿对生态系统服务的影响提供了一种新的研究方法,为决策者和环境监管机构提供了具有空间明确信息的方法,以实施可行的政策,在采矿发展与生态系统服务提供之间取得平衡。