Suppr超能文献

基于生物标志物的神经退行性疾病谱的诊断标准的建立。

The path to biomarker-based diagnostic criteria for the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Sorbonne University, GRC n° 21, Alzheimer Precision Medicine (APM), AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Boulevard de l'hôpital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 Apr;20(4):421-441. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1731306. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

Abstract

: The examination still represents the reference standard for detecting the pathological nature of chronic neurodegenerative diseases (NDD). This approach displays intrinsic conceptual limitations since NDD represent a dynamic of partially overlapping phenotypes, shared pathomechanistic alterations that often give rise to mixed pathologies.: We scrutinized the international clinical diagnostic criteria of NDD and the literature to provide a roadmap toward a biomarker-based classification of the NDD . A few pathophysiological biomarkers have been established for NDD. These are time-consuming, invasive, and not suitable for preclinical detection. Candidate screening biomarkers are gaining momentum. Blood neurofilament light-chain represents a robust first-line tool to detect neurodegeneration and serum progranulin helps detect genetic frontotemporal dementia. Ultrasensitive assays and retinal scans may identify Aβ pathology early, in blood and the eye, respectively. Ultrasound also represents a minimally invasive option to investigate the . Protein misfolding amplification assays may accurately detect α-synuclein in biofluids.: Data-driven strategies using quantitative rather than categorical variables may be more reliable for quantification of contributions from pathophysiological mechanisms and their spatial-temporal evolution. A systems biology approach is suitable to untangle the dynamics triggering loss of proteostasis, driving neurodegeneration and clinical evolution.

摘要

: 检查仍然是检测慢性神经退行性疾病(NDD)病理性质的参考标准。这种方法存在内在的概念局限性,因为 NDD 是部分重叠表型的动态变化,具有共同的病理机制改变,这些改变常常导致混合病理。: 我们仔细研究了 NDD 的国际临床诊断标准和文献,为基于生物标志物的 NDD 分类提供了路线图。已经为 NDD 确定了一些生理病理生物标志物。这些方法耗时、有创,不适合临床前检测。候选筛查生物标志物正在兴起。血液神经丝轻链是检测神经退行性变的有力一线工具,而血清颗粒蛋白前体有助于检测遗传性额颞叶痴呆。超敏检测和视网膜扫描可分别在血液和眼睛中早期识别 Aβ 病理学。超声也是一种微创选择,可以研究脑。蛋白质错误折叠扩增检测可在生物液中准确检测α-突触核蛋白。: 使用定量而不是分类变量的基于数据的策略可能更可靠,可用于量化病理生理机制及其时空演变的贡献。系统生物学方法适用于理清触发蛋白质稳态丧失、驱动神经退行性变和临床演变的动力学。

相似文献

6
The role of synaptic biomarkers in the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases.突触生物标志物在神经退行性疾病谱中的作用。
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2020 Jul-Aug;17(7-8):543-559. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2020.1831388. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
7
How many biomarkers to discriminate neurodegenerative dementia?需要多少生物标志物来区分神经退行性痴呆?
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2015;52(6):314-26. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2015.1051658. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Biomarker-guided clustering of Alzheimer's disease clinical syndromes.基于生物标志物的阿尔茨海默病临床综合征聚类。
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Nov;83:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.032. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Quantitative susceptibility mapping in atypical Parkinsonisms.非典型帕金森病的定量磁敏感图。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;24:101999. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101999. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验