Omar Ahmad K, Wang Zhen-Gang, Brady John F
Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Phys Rev E. 2020 Jan;101(1-1):012604. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.012604.
The unique pressure exerted by active particles-the "swim" pressure-has proven to be a useful quantity in explaining many of the seemingly confounding behaviors of active particles. However, its use has also resulted in some puzzling findings including an extremely negative surface tension between phase separated active particles. Here, we demonstrate that this contradiction stems from the fact that the swim pressure is not a true pressure. At a boundary or interface, the reduction in particle swimming generates a net active force density-an entirely self-generated body force. The pressure at the boundary, which was previously identified as the swim pressure, is in fact an elevated (relative to the bulk) value of the traditional particle pressure that is generated by this interfacial force density. Recognizing this unique mechanism for stress generation allows us to define a much more physically plausible surface tension. We clarify the utility of the swim pressure as an "equivalent pressure" (analogous to those defined from electrostatic and gravitational body forces) and the conditions in which this concept can be appropriately applied.
活性粒子施加的独特压力——“游动”压力——已被证明在解释活性粒子许多看似令人困惑的行为方面是一个有用的量。然而,它的使用也导致了一些令人困惑的发现,包括相分离的活性粒子之间存在极低的表面张力。在这里,我们证明这种矛盾源于游动压力不是真正压力这一事实。在边界或界面处,粒子游动的减少会产生净活性力密度——一种完全自我产生的体力。之前被认定为游动压力的边界处的压力,实际上是由这种界面力密度产生的传统粒子压力的一个升高(相对于主体)的值。认识到这种独特的应力产生机制使我们能够定义一个更符合物理实际的表面张力。我们阐明了游动压力作为“等效压力”(类似于由静电力和引力体力定义的压力)的效用以及该概念可以适当应用的条件。