Nawas Mariam T, Landau Heather J, Sauter Craig S, Featherstone Catherine A, Kenny Sheila A, Rodriguez Elizabeth S, Johnson Lauren G, Giralt Sergio A, Scordo Michael
Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jun;26(6):e135-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
Telehealth involves the use of telecommunication and information technology for the delivery of clinical care and may be a mechanism to alleviate the burden of visits faced by patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Few studies have evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of telehealth visits in the care of HCT patients. We conducted 27 telehealth visits with 25 patients undergoing HCT using a videoconferencing system that allows for real-time, 2-way interactions and administered satisfaction surveys to patients and providers. Of the 25 patients included in the study, 20 (80%) and 5 (20%) were undergoing autologous and allogeneic HCT, respectively. The telehealth visits were distributed as follows: 3 inpatient visits upon admission for HCT; 11 inpatient visits between 2 and 14 days post-HCT; 4 inpatient visits prior to discharge after HCT; 8 outpatient, post-HCT follow-up visits; and 1 handoff to a community oncologist. Out of a total of 54 provider assessments, 7 providers (13%) were unable to complete some part of the physical examination, but no provider reported being unable to manage patients' symptoms through telehealth. Eighty-one percent of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with the telemedicine session. Overall satisfaction was higher among patients than providers (mean scores 4.12 versus 2.64; scale 1 to 5, with 1 = very poor to 5 = excellent). Technological barriers resulting in delays and suboptimal physical examination were largely responsible for provider dissatisfaction. The use of telehealth to deliver comprehensive follow-up care to HCT patients is feasible across different HCT types but is dependent upon quality of data streaming and videoconferencing technologies.
远程医疗涉及利用电信和信息技术提供临床护理,可能是减轻造血细胞移植(HCT)患者就诊负担的一种方式。很少有研究评估远程医疗就诊在HCT患者护理中的可行性和可接受性。我们使用允许实时双向互动的视频会议系统,对25例接受HCT的患者进行了27次远程医疗就诊,并对患者和医护人员进行了满意度调查。纳入研究的25例患者中,20例(80%)接受自体HCT,5例(20%)接受异体HCT。远程医疗就诊分布如下:HCT入院时3次住院就诊;HCT后2至14天内11次住院就诊;HCT出院前4次住院就诊;8次门诊HCT后随访就诊;以及1次向社区肿瘤学家的交接。在总共54次医护人员评估中,7名医护人员(13%)无法完成体格检查的某些部分,但没有医护人员报告无法通过远程医疗处理患者症状。81%的患者对远程医疗会诊感到满意或非常满意。患者的总体满意度高于医护人员(平均得分4.12对2.64;1至5分制,1 = 非常差至5 = 优秀)。导致延迟和体格检查不理想的技术障碍是医护人员不满的主要原因。利用远程医疗为HCT患者提供全面的随访护理在不同类型的HCT中是可行的,但取决于数据流和视频会议技术的质量。