Comparison of two platelet rich plasma formulations with viscosupplementation in treatment of moderate grade gonarthrosis: A prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND

The success of platelet rich plasma (PRP) applications in conservative treatment of moderate gonarthrosis has increased over time. Two different PRP formulations that buffy coat (Leukocyte rich PRP: LR-PRP) and plasma-based (Leukocyte poor PRP: LP-PRP) are obtained by different centrifugation methods. This prospective randomized trial was whether LP-PRP will be more effective combination for moderate gonarthrosis when compared to LR-PRP or HA.

METHODS

A total 90 patients suffering from moderate knee osteoarthritis were enrolled. Patients were divided equally into three groups and treated with 3 times LR-PRP, LP-PRP and HA injections. A prospective evaluation was done at baseline, and then at 2, 6 and 12 months of follow-up using VAS, WOMAC and Likert scoring systems.

RESULTS

The 2nd, 6th and 12th month VAS and WOMAC scores of LR-PRP demonstrated the most obvious improvement. Recurrence of symptoms was statistically lower (3; 10%) in LR-PRP group (p < 0.001). Male gender had lower recurrence rate than females (1 vs. 18; p = 0.043). Only high BMI had statistically negative effect on recovery and recurrence rates (p = 0.004). Local adverse effects were more common in LR-PRP group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PRP injections produced superior results than HA. LR-PRP seems to be the most effective treatment modality for moderate gonarthrosis especially in normal weighted men at the 6th decade of age.