Department of Sociology/Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, 9712 TG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10 F, 114 18, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Sep;49(9):1767-1782. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01206-0. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adolescents experience elevated levels of internalizing problems and use more substances than heterosexual adolescents. The minority stress and psychological mediation framework are complementary theoretical frameworks that were developed to explain these disparities. However, limited empirical research has integrated both frameworks to study health disparities between heterosexual and LGB adolescents. This study attempts such an integration, using data from the first five waves (participant age 11-22) of the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS), a cohort study of Dutch adolescents (N = 1738; 151 LGB; 54.8% girls). It was tested whether an LGB identity was linked to internalizing problems and substance use through a serial mediation process, in which sexual identity would be associated with peer victimization and negative relationships with parents (first set of mediators, in keeping with the minority stress framework), which in turn would be associated with fear of negative social evaluation and a lack of social support (second set of mediators, in keeping with the psychological mediation framework), and eventually increasing the risk for internalizing problems and elevated levels of substance use. Moreover, it was tested whether the link between minority stress and substance use was mediated by peers' substance use levels, as hypothesized by the psychological mediation framework. Compared to heterosexual participants, LGB participants reported more internalizing problems, smoked more cigarettes, and used more marijuana, but did not consume more alcohol. The relation between sexual identity and internalizing problems was mediated by peer victimization and parental rejection, which is in line with the minority stress framework. No statistically significant support was found for the psychological mediation framework. These findings provide a better understanding of the pathways through which sexual identity disparities in mental wellbeing and substance use come about.
女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋 (LGB) 青少年经历更高水平的内化问题,并且比异性恋青少年使用更多的物质。少数群体压力和心理中介框架是互补的理论框架,旨在解释这些差异。然而,有限的实证研究将这两个框架整合起来,以研究异性恋和 LGB 青少年之间的健康差异。本研究试图整合这两个框架,使用荷兰青少年 TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey(TRAILS)的前五个波次(参与者年龄 11-22 岁)的数据,这是一项青少年队列研究(N = 1738;151 名 LGB;54.8%为女孩)。通过一个序列中介过程检验了 LGB 身份是否与内化问题和物质使用有关,该过程是少数群体压力框架所假设的,即性身份与同伴受害和与父母的负面关系相关(第一组中介,与少数群体压力框架一致),这反过来又与对负面社会评价的恐惧和缺乏社会支持相关(第二组中介,与心理中介框架一致),最终增加了内化问题和物质使用水平升高的风险。此外,还测试了少数群体压力和物质使用之间的联系是否被同伴的物质使用水平所中介,这是心理中介框架所假设的。与异性恋参与者相比,LGB 参与者报告了更多的内化问题,吸烟更多,使用更多的大麻,但没有更多的酒精消费。性身份与内化问题之间的关系是由同伴受害和父母拒绝所中介的,这符合少数群体压力框架。没有发现心理中介框架的统计学支持。这些发现更好地理解了心理健康和物质使用方面的性身份差异产生的途径。