Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University School of Medicine Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):484-495. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2019.2541. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
Worldwide, horses play critical roles in recreation, food production, transportation, and as working animals. Horses' roles differ by geographical region and the socioeconomic status of the people, but despite modern advances in transportation, which have in some ways altered humans contact with horses, potential risks for equine zoonotic pathogen transmission to humans occur globally. While previous reports have focused upon individual or groups of equine pathogens, to our knowledge, a systematic review of equine zoonoses has never been performed. Using PRISMA's systematic review guidelines, we searched the English literature and identified 233 previous reports of potential equine zoonoses found in horses. We studied and summarized their findings with a goal of identifying risk factors that favor disease transmission from horses to humans. These previous reports identified 56 zoonotic pathogens that have been found in horses. Of the 233 articles, 13 involved direct transmission to humans (5.6%).The main potential routes of transmission included oral, inhalation, and cutaneous exposures. Pathogens most often manifest in humans through systemic, gastrointestinal, and dermatological signs and symptoms. Furthermore, 16.1% were classified as emerging infectious diseases and thus may be less known to both the equine and human medical community. Sometimes, these infections were severe leading to human and equine death. While case reports of zoonotic infections directly from horses remain low, there is a high potential for underreporting due to lack of knowledge among health professionals. Awareness of these zoonotic pathogens, their disease presentation in horses and humans, and their associated risk factors for cross-species infection are important to public health officials, clinicians, and people with recreational or occupational equid exposure.
在全球范围内,马在娱乐、食品生产、交通以及作为工作动物等方面发挥着至关重要的作用。马的角色因地理位置和人们的社会经济地位而异,但尽管现代交通技术的进步在某些方面改变了人类与马的接触方式,但马向人类传播人畜共患病原体的潜在风险仍然存在于全球各地。虽然之前的报告集中在单个或一组马病原体上,但据我们所知,从未对马人畜共患病进行过系统审查。 我们使用 PRISMA 的系统评价指南,搜索了英文文献,确定了 233 篇之前关于马潜在人畜共患病的报告。我们研究并总结了它们的发现,目的是确定有利于疾病从马传播给人类的危险因素。 这些之前的报告确定了 56 种已在马中发现的人畜共患病原体。在 233 篇文章中,有 13 篇涉及直接向人类传播(5.6%)。主要的潜在传播途径包括口服、吸入和皮肤暴露。病原体最常通过全身、胃肠道和皮肤症状和体征在人类中表现出来。此外,16.1%被归类为新发传染病,因此可能不为马和人类医学界所熟知。有时,这些感染很严重,导致人和马死亡。 虽然直接从马感染人畜共患病的病例报告仍然很少,但由于卫生专业人员缺乏知识,报告可能存在很大的不足。了解这些人畜共患病原体、它们在马和人类中的疾病表现以及它们与跨物种感染相关的危险因素,对公共卫生官员、临床医生和有娱乐或职业性接触马的人来说非常重要。