Joachim Jona, Coutrot Maxime, Millasseau Sandrine, Matéo Joaquim, Mebazaa Alexandre, Gayat Etienne, Vallée Fabrice
Department of Anesthesiology, Burn and Critical Care, St-Louis-Lariboisière-Fernand Widal University Hospitals, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.
INSERM UMR-942, Paris, France.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):395-404. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00486-y. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
Hypotension during general anesthesia is associated with poor outcome. Continuous monitoring of mean blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia is useful and needs to be reliable and minimally invasive. Conventional cuff measurements can lead to delays due to its discontinuous nature. It has been shown that there is a relationship between MAP and photoplethysmography (PPG) parameters like the dicrotic notch and perfusion index (PI). The objective of the study was to continuously estimate MAP from PPG. Pulse wave analysis based on PPG was implemented using either notch relative amplitude (MAP), notch absolute amplitude (MAP) or PI (MAP) to estimate MAP from PPG waveform features during general anesthesia. Estimated MAP values were compared to brachial cuff MAP (MAPcuff) and to radial invasive MAP (MAPinv). Forty-six patients were analyzed for a total of 235 h. Compared to MAPcuff, mean bias and limits of agreement were 1 mmHg (- 26 to +29), - 1 mmHg (- 10 to +8) and - 3 mmHg (- 21 to +13) for MAP, MAP and MAP respectively. Compared to MAPinv, mean absolute error (MAE) was 20 mmHg [10 to 39], 11 mmHg [5 to 18] and 16 mmHg [9 to 24] for MAP derived from MAP, MAP and MAP respectively. When calibrated every 5 min, MAP showed a MAE of 6 mmHg [5 to 9]. MAP provides the best estimates with respect to brachial cuff MAP and invasive MAP. Regular calibration allows to reduce drift over time. Beat to beat estimation of MAP during general anesthesia from the PPG appears possible with an acceptable average error.
全身麻醉期间的低血压与不良预后相关。麻醉期间持续监测平均动脉压(MAP)很有用,且需要可靠且微创。传统的袖带测量因其不连续性可能导致延迟。研究表明,MAP与光电容积脉搏波描记法(PPG)参数(如重搏波切迹和灌注指数(PI))之间存在关联。本研究的目的是从PPG连续估计MAP。基于PPG的脉搏波分析通过使用切迹相对幅度(MAP)、切迹绝对幅度(MAP)或PI(MAP)来从全身麻醉期间的PPG波形特征估计MAP。将估计的MAP值与肱动脉袖带MAP(MAPcuff)和桡动脉有创MAP(MAPinv)进行比较。对46例患者进行了总计235小时的分析。与MAPcuff相比,MAP、MAP和MAP的平均偏差及一致性界限分别为1 mmHg(-26至+29)、-1 mmHg(-10至+8)和-3 mmHg(-21至+13)。与MAPinv相比,由MAP、MAP和MAP得出的MAP的平均绝对误差(MAE)分别为20 mmHg [10至39]、11 mmHg [5至18]和16 mmHg [9至24]。每5分钟校准一次时,MAP的MAE为6 mmHg [5至9]。就肱动脉袖带MAP和有创MAP而言,MAP提供了最佳估计值。定期校准可减少随时间的漂移。在全身麻醉期间从PPG逐搏估计MAP似乎是可行的,平均误差可接受。