• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对英国软饮料行业征税公告对股市反应的分析。

An analysis of the stock market reaction to the announcements of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy.

机构信息

Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Aug;38:100834. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100834. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100834
PMID:32081676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7397522/
Abstract

On 16 March 2016, the government of the United Kingdom announced the Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), under which UK soft-drink manufacturers were to be taxed according to the volume of products with added sugar they produced or imported. We use 'event study' methodology to assess the likely financial effect of the SDIL on parts of the soft drinks industry, using stock returns of four UK-operating soft-drink firms listed on the London Stock Exchange. We found that three of the four firms experienced negative abnormal stock returns on the day of announcement. A cross-sectional analysis revealed that the cumulative abnormal returns of soft drink stocks were not significantly less than that of other food and drinks-related stocks beyond the day of the SDIL announcement. Our findings suggest that the SDIL announcement was initially perceived as detrimental news by the market but negative stock returns were short-lived, indicating a lack of major concerns for industry. There was limited evidence of a negative stock market reaction to the two subsequent announcements: release of draft legislation on 5 December 2016, and confirmation of the tax rates on 8 March 2017.

摘要

2016 年 3 月 16 日,英国政府宣布软饮料行业征税计划(SDIL),根据该计划,英国软饮料制造商将根据其生产或进口的含糖产品的数量征税。我们使用“事件研究”方法来评估 SDIL 对软饮料行业部分领域的潜在财务影响,使用在伦敦证券交易所上市的四家英国运营软饮料公司的股票回报数据。我们发现,在宣布日,四家公司中有三家的异常股票回报为负。横截面分析表明,SDIL 宣布日之后,软饮料类股的累计异常回报率并不明显低于其他食品和饮料相关类股。我们的研究结果表明,SDIL 宣布最初被市场视为不利消息,但负面的股票回报是短暂的,这表明行业对此缺乏重大担忧。随后两次宣布消息——2016 年 12 月 5 日发布立法草案和 2017 年 3 月 8 日确认税率——对股市的负面反应有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/75bae752ed62/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/14acd45ccefe/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/a273fd440f0a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/a7cd057f1296/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/8bd2fd9f47d0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/75bae752ed62/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/14acd45ccefe/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/a273fd440f0a/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/a7cd057f1296/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/8bd2fd9f47d0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5877/7397522/75bae752ed62/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
An analysis of the stock market reaction to the announcements of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy.对英国软饮料行业征税公告对股市反应的分析。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Aug;38:100834. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100834. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买的软饮料变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 10;372:n254. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n254.
3
The impact of UK soft drinks industry levy on manufacturers' domestic turnover.英国软饮料行业征税对制造商国内营业额的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 May;37:100866. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100866. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
4
Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015-19: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国软饮料行业征税的宣布和实施对英国 2015-19 年软饮料的含糖量、价格、产品规格和种类的影响:一项基于控制的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 11;17(2):e1003025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003025. eCollection 2020 Feb.
5
Anticipatory changes in British household purchases of soft drinks associated with the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A controlled interrupted time series analysis.英国家庭购买软饮料的预期变化与软饮料行业征税公告相关:一项基于对照的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Nov 12;17(11):e1003269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003269. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
The impact of the UK soft drink industry levy on the soft drink marketplace, 2017-2020: An interrupted time series analysis with comparator series.2017-2020 年英国软饮料行业征税对软饮料市场的影响:基于比较序列的中断时间序列分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0301890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301890. eCollection 2024.
7
Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.英国软饮料行业征税公告发布后业界和相关组织的反应:2016-2018 年英国媒体文章的纵向主题分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15190-0.
8
A discourse network analysis of UK newspaper coverage of the "sugar tax" debate before and after the announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy.在宣布软饮料行业征税前后,对英国报纸对“糖税”辩论的话语网络分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 2;19(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9.
9
Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study.英国成年人对英国软饮料行业征税的支持及其感知效果:国际粮食政策研究的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e026698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026698.
10
Parliamentary reaction to the announcement and implementation of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: applied thematic analysis of 2016-2020 parliamentary debates.议会对英国软饮料行业征税公告和实施的反应:2016-2020 年议会辩论的应用主题分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Jan 24;27(1):e51. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000247.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of implemented global dietary interventions: a scoping review of fiscal policies.实施全球饮食干预措施的效果:财政政策的范围界定综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):2552. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19988-4.
2
Unveiling viewpoints on national food environment policies in the Dutch newspaper discourse: an interpretative media content analysis.揭示荷兰报纸话语中对国家食品环境政策的观点:解释性媒体内容分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Jul 24;21(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01625-3.
3
Changes in soft drinks purchased by British households associated with the UK soft drinks industry levy: a controlled interrupted time series analysis.
英国家庭购买软饮料的变化与英国软饮料行业征税有关:一项对照中断时间序列分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 5;13(12):e077059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077059.
4
Industry views of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: a thematic analysis of elite interviews with food and drink industry professionals, 2018-2020.行业视角下的英国软饮料行业征税:对食品和饮料行业专业人士的精英访谈的主题分析,2018-2020 年。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 9;13(8):e072223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072223.
5
Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18.英国软饮料行业征税公告发布后业界和相关组织的反应:2016-2018 年英国媒体文章的纵向主题分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15190-0.
6
Adolescents' perspectives on soft drinks after the introduction of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: A focus group study using reflexive thematic analysis.英国软饮料行业征税后青少年对软饮料的看法:使用反思性主题分析的焦点小组研究。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106305. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106305. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
7
Outcomes Following Taxation of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.对含糖饮料征税的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2215276. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15276.
8
Understanding Marketing Responses to a Tax on Sugary Drinks: A Qualitative Interview Study in the United Kingdom, 2019.理解对含糖饮料征税的市场反应:2019 年英国的定性访谈研究
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2618-2629. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.5465. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
9
A Research on the Crisis Spillover Effect of Food Safety Incidents on Competitive Firms: The Influence of Political Connections and Charitable Donations.食品安全事件对竞争企业的危机溢出效应研究:政治关联和慈善捐赠的影响。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 25;9:766385. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.766385. eCollection 2021.
10
Media representations of opposition to the 'junk food advertising ban' on the Transport for London (TfL) network: A thematic content analysis of UK news and trade press.伦敦交通局(TfL)网络上反对“垃圾食品广告禁令”的媒体报道:英国新闻和行业媒体的主题内容分析
SSM Popul Health. 2021 May 27;15:100828. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100828. eCollection 2021 Sep.