Dreyer Ingo, Michard Erwan
Centro de Bioinformática y Simulación Molecular, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 30;10:1797. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01797. eCollection 2019.
Plants have to absorb essential nutrients from the soil and do this specialized membrane proteins. Groundbreaking studies about half a century ago led to the identification of different nutrient uptake systems in plant roots. Historically, they have been characterized as "high-affinity" uptake systems acting at low nutrient concentrations or as "low-affinity" uptake systems acting at higher concentrations. Later this "high- and low-affinity" concept was extended by "dual-affinity" transporters. Here, in this study it is now demonstrated that the affinity concept based on enzyme kinetics does not have proper scientific grounds. Different computational cell biology scenarios show that affinity analyses, as they are often performed in wet-lab experiments, are not suited for reliably characterizing transporter proteins. The new insights provided here clearly indicate that the classification of transporters on the basis of enzyme kinetics is largely misleading, thermodynamically in no way justified and obsolete.
植物必须从土壤中吸收必需养分,这要通过专门的膜蛋白来完成。大约半个世纪前的开创性研究促成了植物根系中不同养分吸收系统的鉴定。从历史上看,它们被描述为在低养分浓度下起作用的“高亲和力”吸收系统,或在高浓度下起作用的“低亲和力”吸收系统。后来,这种“高亲和力和低亲和力”的概念被“双亲和力”转运体所扩展。在此研究中,现已证明基于酶动力学的亲和力概念没有合适的科学依据。不同的计算细胞生物学情景表明,在湿实验室实验中经常进行的亲和力分析并不适合可靠地表征转运蛋白。这里提供的新见解清楚地表明,基于酶动力学对转运体进行分类在很大程度上具有误导性,在热力学上毫无根据且已过时。