Morina Nicolò, Johnson Peter A, O'Reilly Megan, Lee Tze-Fun, Yaskina Maryna, Cheung Po-Yin, Schmölzer Georg M
Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Jan 31;8:18. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00018. eCollection 2020.
Approximately 10% of newborn infants require resuscitation at birth. Accurate heart rate (HR) assessment guides resuscitation interventions, thereby reducing morbidities and mortality. While existing HR assessment methods have several limitations, the Doppler ultrasound (Doppler-US) might be a promising alternative. We aimed to evaluate accuracy and optimal use of Doppler-US for HR assessments during neonatal asphyxia in a pre-clinical model. HR assessments were performed in 16 term newborn piglets that were anesthetized, intubated, and instrumented. Study I evaluated optimal transducer position, Study II compared aortic (AV) and pulmonary (PV) examination modes, and Study III examined accuracy during asphyxia, for HR assessment. Experimental setting. Asphyxia-induced piglets. Study I: Doppler-US (USCOM® 1A) HR was assessed on upper (A), middle (B), and lower (C) third of the sternum; study II: Doppler-US HR was assessed using AV and PV examination modes; study III: HR was assessed during asphyxia. Comparisons were made between Doppler-US and the clinical gold standard for HR assessments, electrocardiography (ECG). Study I: Mean (SD) Doppler-US HR at position A, B, and C showed no difference when compared to ECG HR. Study II: The mean (SD) Doppler-US HR using AV and PV modes also showed no difference when compared to ECG HR. Study III: Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between Doppler-US and ECG HR of 1.5 (-16 to 19) bpm. Additionally, motion artifacts produced false peaks and peak size was seen to decrease as bradycardia progressed. HR assessment using Doppler-US during asphyxia is accurate but has limitations and must be further evaluated prior to clinical use. Doppler-US can be positioned along the sternum and use either AV or PV mode for accurate assessments in a piglet model of neonatal asphyxia.
约10%的新生儿出生时需要复苏。准确的心率(HR)评估可指导复苏干预措施,从而降低发病率和死亡率。虽然现有的HR评估方法存在一些局限性,但多普勒超声(Doppler-US)可能是一种有前景的替代方法。我们旨在评估在临床前模型中,Doppler-US用于新生儿窒息时HR评估的准确性和最佳使用方法。对16只足月新生仔猪进行麻醉、插管并安装监测仪器后进行HR评估。研究I评估最佳换能器位置,研究II比较主动脉(AV)和肺动脉(PV)检查模式,研究III检查窒息期间HR评估的准确性。实验设置:窒息诱导仔猪。研究I:在胸骨上三分之一(A)、中三分之一(B)和下三分之一(C)处评估Doppler-US(USCOM® 1A)HR;研究II:使用AV和PV检查模式评估Doppler-US HR;研究III:在窒息期间评估HR。将Doppler-US与HR评估的临床金标准心电图(ECG)进行比较。研究I:与ECG HR相比,位置A、B和C处的平均(标准差)Doppler-US HR无差异。研究II:与ECG HR相比,使用AV和PV模式的平均(标准差)Doppler-US HR也无差异。研究III:Bland-Altman分析显示,Doppler-US与ECG HR之间的平均差异(95%一致性界限)为1.5(-16至19)次/分。此外,运动伪影产生假峰,且随着心动过缓进展,峰大小减小。窒息期间使用Doppler-US进行HR评估是准确的,但存在局限性,在临床应用前必须进一步评估。在新生仔猪窒息模型中,Doppler-US可沿胸骨定位,并使用AV或PV模式进行准确评估。