Suppr超能文献

特定胚胎培养条件对辅助生殖技术治疗周期结局的影响:一项英国全国性研究。

The impact of selected embryo culture conditions on ART treatment cycle outcomes: a UK national study.

作者信息

Castillo Catherine M, Harper Joyce, Roberts Stephen A, O'Neill Helen C, Johnstone Edward D, Brison Daniel R

机构信息

Maternal & Fetal Health Research Centre, Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9WL, UK.

Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London WC1E 6HX, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Feb 10;2020(1):hoz031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz031. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Are selected embryo culture conditions namely media, oxygen level, and incubator type, associated with IVF live birth rate (LBR) and the health of singleton offspring at birth?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There were statistically significant differences in LBR between the eight culture media systems analysed; however, none of the embryo culture factors showed statistically significant associations with birth weight (BW) in multivariable regression analyses.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In clinical ART culture media is the initial environment provided for the growth of human embryos. Pre-implantation development is a critical period of developmental plasticity, which could have long-lasting effects on offspring growth and health. Although some studies have shown an impact of culture medium type on BW, the interaction between culture medium type and associated culture conditions on both treatment success rates (LBR) and offspring BW is largely unexplored. This study aimed to examine these factors in a large multicentre national survey capturing the range of clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

In this cross-sectional study, data from a survey circulated to all UK IVF clinics requesting information regarding culture medium type, incubator type, and oxygen level used in ART between January 2011 and December 2013 were merged with routinely recorded treatment and outcome data held in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Register up to the end of 2014.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: Forty-six (62%) UK clinics responded to the survey. A total of 75 287 fresh IVF/ICSI cycles were captured, including 18 693 singleton live births. IVF success (live birth, singleton or multiple; LB), singleton gestation and singleton gestation-adjusted BW were analysed using logistic and linear regression models adjusting for patient/treatment characteristics and clinic-specific effects.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Culture medium type was shown to have some impact on LBR (multivariable logistic regression, (MRL); post-regression Wald test,  < 0.001), but not on BW (MLR; post-regression Wald test,  = 0.215). However, blastocyst culture had the largest observed effect on odds of LBR (odds ratio (OR) = 1.35, CI: 1.29-1.42), increased the risk of pre-term birth even when controlling for oxygen tension (MLR; OR = 1.42, CI: 1.23-1.63), and gestation-adjusted BW (MLR, β = 38.97 g, CI: 19.42-58.53 g) when compared to cleavage-stage embryo culture. We noted a very strong effect of clinic site on both LBR and BW, thus confounding between treatment practices and clinic site may have masked the effect of culture conditions.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Larger datasets with more inter-centre variation are also needed, with key embryo culture variables comprehensively recorded in national treatment registries.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study is the largest investigation of laboratory environmental effects in IVF on both LBR and singleton BW. Our findings largely agree with the literature, which has failed to show a consistent advantage of one culture media type over another. However, we noted some association of LBR with medium type, and the duration of embryo exposure to laboratory conditions (blastocyst culture) was associated with both LBR and singleton health at birth. Because of the strong effect of clinic site noted, further randomized controlled trials are needed in order to reliably determine the effect of embryo culture on IVF success rates and the growth and health of subsequent offspring.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was funded by the EU FP7 project grant EpiHealthNet (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN -317 146). The authors have no competing interests to declare.

摘要

研究问题

特定的胚胎培养条件,即培养基、氧气水平和培养箱类型,与体外受精活产率(LBR)及单胎出生时的健康状况是否相关?

简要回答

在分析的八种培养基系统之间,LBR存在统计学显著差异;然而,在多变量回归分析中,没有胚胎培养因素与出生体重(BW)呈现出统计学显著关联。

已知信息

在临床辅助生殖技术中,培养基是为人类胚胎生长提供的初始环境。植入前发育是发育可塑性的关键时期,可能对后代生长和健康产生长期影响。尽管一些研究显示培养基类型对BW有影响,但培养基类型与相关培养条件在治疗成功率(LBR)和后代BW方面的相互作用在很大程度上尚未得到探索。本研究旨在通过一项涵盖临床实践范围的大型多中心全国性调查来研究这些因素。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:在这项横断面研究中,将2011年1月至2013年12月期间分发给所有英国体外受精诊所的一项调查数据(该调查请求提供辅助生殖技术中使用的培养基类型、培养箱类型和氧气水平的信息)与人类受精与胚胎学管理局登记册中截至2014年底常规记录的治疗和结局数据进行了合并。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:46家(62%)英国诊所回复了调查。共纳入75287个新鲜体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期,包括18693例单胎活产。使用逻辑回归和线性回归模型分析体外受精成功率(活产、单胎或多胎;LB)、单胎妊娠和单胎妊娠调整后的BW,并对患者/治疗特征和诊所特定效应进行了调整。

主要结果及机遇的作用

培养基类型对LBR有一定影响(多变量逻辑回归,(MRL);回归后Wald检验,<0.001),但对BW无影响(MLR;回归后Wald检验,=0.215)。然而,囊胚培养对LBR几率的观察到的影响最大(优势比(OR)=1.35,CI:范围1.29 - 1.42),即使在控制氧张力时也增加了早产风险(MLR;OR = 1.42,CI:范围1.23 - 1.63),并且与卵裂期胚胎培养相比,妊娠调整后的BW(MLR,β = 38.97 g,CI:范围19.42 - 58.53 g)也有所不同。我们注意到诊所地点对LBR和BW都有非常强烈的影响,因此治疗实践和诊所地点之间的混杂可能掩盖了培养条件的影响。

局限性、谨慎的原因:还需要更大的数据集,且中心间变异更多,同时关键胚胎培养变量要在国家治疗登记册中全面记录。

研究结果的更广泛影响

本研究是对体外受精中实验室环境对LBR和单胎BW影响的最大规模调查。我们的研究结果在很大程度上与文献一致,文献未能显示出一种培养基类型相对于另一种具有持续的优势。然而,我们注意到LBR与培养基类型存在一些关联,并且胚胎暴露于实验室条件的持续时间(囊胚培养)与LBR和单胎出生时的健康状况都相关。由于注意到诊所地点的强烈影响,需要进一步进行随机对照试验,以便可靠地确定胚胎培养对体外受精成功率以及后续后代生长和健康的影响。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究由欧盟第七框架计划项目资助EpiHealthNet(FP7 - PEOPLE - 2012 - ITN - 317146)。作者声明无利益冲突。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3efa/7016773/367c4920403d/hoz031f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验