Suppr超能文献

人类体外受精培养过程中降低氧气浓度可提高每个周期的胚胎利用率和累积妊娠率。

Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.

作者信息

Van Montfoort Aafke P A, Arts Eus G J M, Wijnandts Lydia, Sluijmer Alexander, Pelinck Marie-José, Land Jolande A, Van Echten-Arends Jannie

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Jan 22;2020(1):hoz036. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz036. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Do different oxygen levels during human IVF embryo culture affect embryo utilization, cumulative IVF success rates per cycle and neonatal birthweight?

SUMMARY ANSWER

After 2 days of culture, a lower oxygen level (5%) leads to more good-quality embryos and more embryos that can be cryopreserved, and thereby to a higher cumulative live birth rate per cycle when compared to embryo culture in 20% oxygen, while birthweights are similar.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Several studies have compared IVF outcome parameters after embryo culture in a more physiological level of 5% oxygen and the atmospheric level of 20%. Although there is consensus that embryo development improves in 5% oxygen, effects on pregnancy and live birth rates are mainly seen in blastocyst, but not cleavage-stage transfers. A major drawback of these studies is that only fresh embryo transfers were included, not taking additional frozen-thawed transfers from these cycles into account. This might have underestimated the effects of oxygen level, especially in cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Furthermore, little is known about the effect of oxygen level during culture on birthweight.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This is a cohort study in 871 consecutive patients who had an IVF cycle between January 2012 and December 2013, and 5-7 years follow-up to allow transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. Based on daily availability of positions in the incubators, all oocytes and embryos of one cycle were allocated to one of the three incubators with traditional ambient oxygen levels (6% CO and 20% O in air), or to a fourth incubator that was adjusted to have low oxygen levels of 5% (6% CO, 5% O and 89% N). Embryos were cultured under 5 or 20% oxygen until Day 2 or 3, when embryos were transferred or cryopreserved, respectively. Clinical and other laboratory procedures were similar in both groups.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS: To compare embryo characteristics and (cumulative) pregnancy outcomes between the two oxygen groups, for each patient only the first cycle in the study period was included in the analysis, resulting in 195 cycles in the 5% group (1627 oocytes) and 676 in the 20% oxygen group (5448 oocytes). Embryo characteristics were analysed per cycle and per embryo and were corrected for maternal age, cycle rank order, fertilization method (IVF or ICSI) and cause of subfertility. Perinatal data from the resulting singletons ( = 124 after fresh and 45 after frozen-thawed embryo transfer) were collected from delivery reports from the hospitals or midwife practices.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the 5% oxygen group, there were significantly more embryos of good quality (45.8 versus 30.9% in the 20% group, adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] = 1.9 [1.6-2.4]). This did not result in higher live birth rates per cycle, but after fresh transfers more good-quality spare embryos could be cryopreserved (46.1 versus 29.7%, adjusted OR [95% CI] = 2.0 [1.7-2.5]).After a follow-up period of 5-7 years, in which 82.4% of the cryopreserved embryos from the 5% oxygen group and 85.4% from the 20% oxygen group were thawed, the percentage of patients with at least one live birth resulting from the study cycle was significantly higher in the low oxygen group (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.5 [1.01-2.2]). In 124 live born singletons from fresh embryo transfers and in 45 from transfers of cryopreserved embryos, birthweight was similar in both oxygen groups after correction for confounding factors.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is a retrospective study, and treatment allocation was not randomised. The study was not powered for a predefined birthweight difference. With the number of live births in our study, small differences in birthweight might not have been detected. The selection of embryos to be cryopreserved was based on embryo morphology criteria that might be different in other clinics.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Improved embryo utilization by more cryopreservation leading to higher cumulative live birth rates per cycle favours the use of 5% instead of 20% oxygen during human IVF embryo culture. This study also demonstrates that for comparison of different IVF treatment regimens, the cumulative outcome, including transfers of fresh and frozen-thawed embryos, is to be preferred instead of analysis of fresh embryo transfers only.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: No external funding was received for this study. None of the authors has a conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.

摘要

研究问题

人类体外受精胚胎培养期间不同的氧气水平会影响胚胎利用率、每个周期的体外受精累积成功率以及新生儿出生体重吗?

总结答案

培养2天后,与在20%氧气环境中进行胚胎培养相比,较低的氧气水平(5%)会产生更多优质胚胎和更多可冷冻保存的胚胎,从而使每个周期的累积活产率更高,而出生体重相似。

已知信息

多项研究比较了在更接近生理水平的5%氧气环境和大气水平的20%氧气环境中进行胚胎培养后的体外受精结果参数。尽管人们普遍认为在5%氧气环境中胚胎发育会得到改善,但对妊娠率和活产率的影响主要体现在囊胚移植中,而在卵裂期胚胎移植中未观察到。这些研究的一个主要缺点是仅纳入了新鲜胚胎移植,未考虑这些周期中额外的冻融胚胎移植。这可能低估了氧气水平的影响,尤其是在卵裂期胚胎移植中。此外,关于培养期间氧气水平对出生体重的影响知之甚少。

研究设计规模时长

这是一项队列研究,研究对象为2012年1月至2013年12月期间连续进行体外受精周期的871例患者,并进行了5至7年的随访以允许冻融胚胎移植。根据培养箱中每日的可用位置,将一个周期的所有卵母细胞和胚胎分配到三个具有传统环境氧气水平(空气中6%二氧化碳和20%氧气)的培养箱之一,或分配到第四个调整为具有5%低氧气水平(6%二氧化碳、5%氧气和89%氮气)的培养箱。胚胎在5%或20%氧气环境下培养至第2天或第3天,此时胚胎分别进行移植或冷冻保存。两组的临床和其他实验室操作相似。

参与者/材料设置方法:为比较两个氧气组之间的胚胎特征和(累积)妊娠结局,分析时仅纳入每位患者在研究期间的第一个周期,5%组有195个周期(1627个卵母细胞),20%氧气组有676个周期(5448个卵母细胞)。对每个周期和每个胚胎的胚胎特征进行分析,并对产妇年龄、周期排序、受精方法(体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射)和不孕原因进行校正。从医院或助产士诊所的分娩报告中收集由此产生的单胎(新鲜胚胎移植后为124例,冻融胚胎移植后为45例)的围产期数据。

主要结果及机遇的作用

在5%氧气组中,优质胚胎明显更多(20%组为45.8%,5%组为30.9%,校正优势比(OR)[95%置信区间] = 1.9 [1.6 - 2.4])。这并未导致每个周期的活产率更高,但新鲜移植后可以冷冻保存更多优质备用胚胎(46.1%对29.7%,校正OR [95%置信区间] = 2.0 [1.7 - 2.5])。在5至7年的随访期后,5%氧气组82.4%的冷冻保存胚胎和20%氧气组85.4%的冷冻保存胚胎被解冻,低氧气组中因研究周期导致至少有一次活产的患者百分比显著更高(校正OR [95%置信区间] = 1.5 [1.01 - 2.2])。在124例新鲜胚胎移植出生的单胎和45例冻融胚胎移植出生者中,校正混杂因素后,两个氧气组的出生体重相似。

局限性需谨慎的原因

这是一项回顾性研究,治疗分配并非随机。该研究未针对预先定义的出生体重差异进行设计。以我们研究中的活产数量,可能未检测到出生体重的微小差异。选择冷冻保存的胚胎是基于胚胎形态学标准,其他诊所可能不同。

研究结果的更广泛影响

通过更多冷冻保存提高胚胎利用率,从而使每个周期的累积活产率更高,这有利于在人类体外受精胚胎培养期间使用5%而非20%的氧气。这项研究还表明,为比较不同的体外受精治疗方案,应优先考虑累积结局,包括新鲜和冻融胚胎移植,而不是仅分析新鲜胚胎移植。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究未获得外部资金。作者均无利益冲突声明。

试验注册号

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/888c/6975868/0d3207e5fd4a/hoz036f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验