Suppr超能文献

颈部清扫术不会增加喉切除术的发病率或死亡率。

Neck dissection does not add to morbidity or mortality of laryngectomy.

作者信息

Xiao Christopher C, Imam Sarah A, Nguyen Shaun A, Camilon Marc P, Baker Andrew B, Day Terry A, Lentsch Eric J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.

Department of Health and Human Performance, The Citadel, Charleston, SC, 29409, USA.

出版信息

World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec 5;5(4):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the national rates of complications, readmission, reoperation, death and length of hospital stay after laryngectomy. To explore the risks of neck dissection with laryngectomy using outcomes.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was reviewed retrospectively. The database was analyzed for patients undergoing laryngectomy with and without neck dissection. Demographic, perioperative complication, reoperation, readmission, and death variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

754 patients who underwent total laryngectomy during this time were found. Demographic analysis showed average age was 63 years old, 566 (75.1%) were white, and 598 (79.3%) were male. Of these patients, 520 (69.0%) included a neck dissection while 234 (31.0%) did not. When comparing patients who received a neck dissection to those who did not, there were no significant differences in median length of hospital stay (12.5 days w/ 13.3 days w/o,  = 0.99), rates of complication (40% w/ 35% w/o,  = 0.23), reoperation (13.5% w/ 14% w/o,  = 0.81), readmission (14% w/ 18% w/o,  = 0.27), and death (1.3% w/ 1.3% w/o,  > 0.99). Furthermore, neck dissection did not increase the risk of complication ( = 0.23), readmission ( = 0.27), reoperation ( = 0.81), death ( = 0.94), or lengthened hospital stay ( = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent neck dissection does not increase postoperative morbidity or mortality in patients undergoing total laryngectomies. These results may help physicians make decisions regarding concurrent neck dissection with total laryngectomy.

摘要

目的

研究喉切除术后并发症、再入院、再次手术、死亡的全国发生率以及住院时间。利用相关结果探讨喉切除联合颈部清扫术的风险。

方法

回顾性分析美国外科医师学会国家质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库。对接受或未接受颈部清扫术的喉切除术患者的数据库进行分析。分析人口统计学、围手术期并发症、再次手术、再入院和死亡变量。

结果

在此期间共发现754例行全喉切除术的患者。人口统计学分析显示,平均年龄为63岁,566例(75.1%)为白人,598例(79.3%)为男性。其中,520例(69.0%)接受了颈部清扫术,234例(31.0%)未接受。将接受颈部清扫术的患者与未接受颈部清扫术的患者进行比较,住院中位时间(接受清扫术者为12.5天,未接受者为13.3天,P = 0.99)、并发症发生率(接受清扫术者为40%,未接受者为35%,P = 0.23)、再次手术率(接受清扫术者为13.5%,未接受者为14%,P = 0.81)、再入院率(接受清扫术者为14%,未接受者为18%,P = 0.27)和死亡率(接受清扫术者为1.3%,未接受者为1.3%,P>0.99)均无显著差异。此外,颈部清扫术并未增加并发症风险(P = 0.23)、再入院风险(P = 0.27)、再次手术风险(P = 0.81)、死亡风险(P = 0.94)或延长住院时间(P = 0.38)。

结论

同期颈部清扫术不会增加全喉切除术患者的术后发病率或死亡率。这些结果可能有助于医生在全喉切除术时就同期颈部清扫术做出决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b777/7015850/8de7b33c0ca8/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验