Tohoku University Graduate School of Engineering, Aoba 6-6-05 Aramaki Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8759, Japan.
University of Tsukuba Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2020 Feb 21;39(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40101-020-0214-1.
BACKGROUND: Recently, attempts have been made to use the pulse rate variability (PRV) as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV). PRV, however, may be caused by the fluctuations of left ventricular pre-ejection period and pulse transit time besides HRV. We examined whether PRV differs not only from HRV but also depending on the measurement site. RESULTS: In five healthy subjects, pulse waves were measured simultaneously on both wrists and both forearms together with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) in the supine and sitting positions. Although average pulse interval showed no significant difference from average R-R interval in either positions, PRV showed greater power for the low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) components and lower LF/HF than HRV. The deviations of PRV from HRV in the supine and sitting positions were 13.2% and 7.9% for LF power, 24.5% and 18.3% for HF power, and - 15.0% and - 30.2% for LF/HF, respectively. While the average pulse interval showed 0.8% and 0.5% inter-site variations among the four sites in the supine and sitting positions, respectively, the inter-site variations in PRV were 4.0% and 3.6% for LF power, 3.8% and 4.7% for HF power, and 18.0% and 17.5% for LF/HF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These suggest that PRV shows not only systemic differences from HRV but also considerable inter-site variations.
背景:最近,人们试图使用脉搏率变异度(PRV)作为心率变异度(HRV)的替代指标。然而,PRV 除了 HRV 之外,还可能受到左心室射血前期和脉搏传导时间波动的影响。我们检查了 PRV 是否不仅与 HRV 不同,而且还取决于测量部位。
结果:在五名健康受试者中,我们在仰卧位和坐位时同时在两个手腕和两个前臂上测量脉搏波,并同时记录单导联心电图(ECG)。尽管平均脉搏间隔在两个位置上均与平均 R-R 间隔无显著差异,但 PRV 显示出更高的低频(LF)和高频(HF)分量功率,以及更低的 LF/HF 比值。PRV 与 HRV 在仰卧位和坐位的偏差分别为 LF 功率的 13.2%和 7.9%,HF 功率的 24.5%和 18.3%,以及 LF/HF 的-15.0%和-30.2%。虽然平均脉搏间隔在仰卧位和坐位的四个部位之间的差异分别为 0.8%和 0.5%,但 PRV 的差异分别为 LF 功率的 4.0%和 3.6%,HF 功率的 3.8%和 4.7%,以及 LF/HF 的 18.0%和 17.5%。
结论:这些结果表明,PRV 不仅与 HRV 存在系统差异,而且还存在相当大的部位间差异。
J Physiol Anthropol. 2020-2-21
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016-12
J Physiol Anthropol. 2020-8-18
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014-5-2
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010
Sensors (Basel). 2024-3-23
Physiol Meas. 2023-11-29
PLoS One. 2020-11-9
J Physiol Anthropol. 2020-8-18
Front Physiol. 2019-6-12
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012
Biomed Eng Online. 2005-11-1
Clin Sci (Lond). 1999-10
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994-12