Department of Basic, Clinical, and Biological Psychology, University Jaume I, Castellón, Spain.
Int J Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;147(6):1571-1576. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32938. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Despite recent advances, gender inequality persists in many scientific fields including medicine. Thus far, no study has extensively analyzed the gender composition of contemporary researchers in the oncology field. We examined 40 oncological journals (Web of Science, Oncology category) with different impact factors (Q1-Q4) and extracted all the articles and reviews published during 2015-2017 in order to identify the gender of their authors. Our data showed that women represent about 38% of all the authorships, both in articles and reviews. In relative terms, women are overrepresented as first authors of articles (43.8%), and clearly underrepresented as last or senior authors (<30%). This double pattern, also observed in other medical fields, suggests that age, or more specifically, seniority, may play some role in the gender composition of cancer researchers. Examining the pattern of collaboration, an interesting finding was observed: the articles signed by a woman in the first or in the last position roughly showed gender parity in the byline. We also found some differences in the content of the articles depending on which gender occupies the first and last positions of the authorships.
尽管最近取得了一些进展,但包括医学在内的许多科学领域仍存在性别不平等现象。迄今为止,尚无研究广泛分析肿瘤学领域当代研究人员的性别构成。我们研究了影响因子(Q1-Q4)不同的 40 种肿瘤学期刊(Web of Science,肿瘤学类别),并提取了 2015 年至 2017 年期间发表的所有文章和评论,以确定其作者的性别。我们的数据显示,女性在文章和评论中约占所有作者的 38%。相对而言,女性作为文章的第一作者(43.8%)的比例过高,而作为最后或资深作者(<30%)的比例过低。这种双重模式也在其他医学领域中观察到,表明年龄,或者更具体地说,资历,可能在癌症研究人员的性别构成中发挥一定作用。在研究合作模式时,我们观察到一个有趣的发现:在第一或最后位置署名的女性的文章,其署名中的性别比例大致相当。我们还发现,根据占据作者署名第一和最后位置的性别不同,文章的内容也存在一些差异。