Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University Jaume I, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.
Psychol Rep. 2020 Dec;123(6):2441-2458. doi: 10.1177/0033294119860257. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
Despite recent advances, gender inequality persists in many scientific fields, and Psychology is not alien to this phenomenon. This study presents the evolution of gender composition in American Psychological Association publications in the past six decades, from 1963 to 2016. Longitudinal analysis revealed an important change: women rose from a tiny 12% to 14% in the 1960s to almost gender parity in the last decade (2010s). The pattern of collaboration (coauthorship) shows that women tend to be slightly overrepresented as first author and underrepresented as the last or senior author. In the last two decades, women outnumber men as "new" American Psychological Association authors (authors who publish for the first time in an American Psychological Association journal). These features and the fact that men's publications tend to encompass a much wider range of years suggest that age may play a role in the gender composition of American Psychological Association contributors.
尽管最近取得了一些进展,但在许多科学领域仍然存在性别不平等现象,心理学也不例外。本研究展示了过去六十年(1963 年至 2016 年)美国心理学会出版物中性别构成的演变。纵向分析显示出一个重要的变化:女性从 20 世纪 60 年代的微不足道的 12%至 14%上升到过去十年(21 世纪 10 年代)几乎达到性别平等。合作(合著)模式表明,女性往往作为第一作者略微过多,而作为最后或资深作者则不足。在过去二十年中,女性作为新的美国心理学会作者(首次在《美国心理学会杂志》上发表文章的作者)的数量超过了男性。这些特征以及男性出版物往往涵盖更广泛的年份范围的事实表明,年龄可能在美国心理学会贡献者的性别构成中发挥作用。