• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当代心理学与女性:对科研成果的性别分析

Contemporary psychology and women: A gender analysis of the scientific production.

作者信息

González-Álvarez Julio, Cervera-Crespo Teresa

机构信息

Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, University Jaume I of Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain.

Department of Basic Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):135-143. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12433. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1002/ijop.12433
PMID:28503775
Abstract

Despite important advances made in recent decades, women are still underrepresented in science (less than 30% of authorships). This study presents a bibliometric analysis of all the Psychology articles published in 2009 included in the Web of Science database (Thomson Reuters) in order to examine the contribution of women in contemporary Psychology, their pattern of research collaboration, the scientific content and the scientific impact from a gender perspective. From a total of 90,067 authorships, gender could be identified in 74,413 (82.6%) of them, being 40,782 (54.8%) male authorships and 33,631 (45.2%) female authorships. These data corresponded to 24,477 (49.9%) individual men and 24,553 (50.1%) women, respectively. Therefore, Psychology presents gender parity in the number of authors, and a gender asymmetry in the number of authorships that it is much lower than in science in general and other specific scientific fields. In relative terms, women tend to be concentrated in the first position of the authorship by-line and much less in the last (senior) position. This double pattern suggests that age probably plays a role in (partly) explaining the slight gender disparity of authorships.

摘要

尽管近几十年来取得了重要进展,但女性在科学界的代表性仍然不足(作者署名比例不到30%)。本研究对汤森路透科学网数据库中收录的2009年发表的所有心理学文章进行了文献计量分析,以便从性别角度审视女性在当代心理学中的贡献、她们的研究合作模式、科学内容和科学影响力。在总共90,067个作者署名中,74,413个(82.6%)可以确定性别,其中男性作者署名40,782个(54.8%),女性作者署名33,631个(45.2%)。这些数据分别对应24,477名(49.9%)男性个体和24,553名(50.1%)女性个体。因此,心理学在作者数量上呈现出性别平等,而在作者署名数量上存在性别不对称,且这种不对称远低于一般科学领域和其他特定科学领域。相对而言,女性往往集中在作者署名行的首位,而在末位(资深)的情况则少得多。这种双重模式表明,年龄可能在(部分)解释作者署名的轻微性别差异方面发挥了作用。

相似文献

1
Contemporary psychology and women: A gender analysis of the scientific production.当代心理学与女性:对科研成果的性别分析
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):135-143. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12433. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
Women in contemporary cancer research.当代癌症研究中的女性。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;147(6):1571-1576. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32938. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Gender disparities in high-quality dermatology research: a descriptive bibliometric study on scientific authorships.高质量皮肤病学研究中的性别差异:一项关于科学作者身份的描述性文献计量学研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 13;8(4):e020089. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020089.
4
Sex Disparities in Ophthalmic Research: A Descriptive Bibliometric Study on Scientific Authorships.眼科研究中的性别差异:一项关于科学作者身份的描述性文献计量学研究
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 1;137(11):1223-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3095.
5
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.《自然指数》期刊所揭示的高质量研究中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136. eCollection 2018.
6
Women Publishing in American Psychological Association Journals: A Gender Analysis of Six Decades.《美国心理协会期刊中的女性作者:六十年的性别分析》
Psychol Rep. 2020 Dec;123(6):2441-2458. doi: 10.1177/0033294119860257. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Gender equality in academic research on epilepsy-a study on scientific authorships.癫痫学术研究中的性别平等——一项关于科学作者身份的研究
Epilepsia. 2017 Oct;58(10):1794-1802. doi: 10.1111/epi.13873. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Gender Disparities in Authorships of Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia Research Articles.阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症研究文章作者中的性别差异。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;70(4):1143-1152. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190216.
9
[The gender gap in highest quality medical research - A scientometric analysis of the representation of female authors in highest impact medical journals].[高质量医学研究中的性别差距——对高影响力医学期刊中女性作者代表性的科学计量分析]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018 May;143(10):e85-e94. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-102267. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Gender disparities in pediatric research: a descriptive bibliometric study on scientific authorships.性别差异在儿科研究中的体现:基于科学作者身份的描述性文献计量研究。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Jul;92(1):80-90. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02010-1. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural Barriers to Women's Progression in Academic Careers: A France-Brazil Comparison Through the Lens of the Queen Bee Phenomena.女性在学术职业发展中的文化障碍:通过蜂王现象视角进行的法国与巴西比较
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Apr;66(2):210-218. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13078. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
2
Women in Behavior Analysis: A Review of the Literature.行为分析领域中的女性:文献综述
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Sep 29;15(2):592-607. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00642-z. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Gender variations in citation distributions in medicine are very small and due to self-citation and journal prestige.
医学领域引文分布中的性别差异很小,这是由于自引和期刊声望造成的。
Elife. 2019 Jul 15;8:e45374. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45374.