Weijers Julia M, Semb Anne G, Rollefstad Silvia, Kitas George D, van Riel Piet L C M
Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, IQ Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, PO box 9101 (114), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Rheumatology, Preventive Cardio-Rheuma Clinic, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rheumatol Int. 2020 Apr;40(4):523-527. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04533-4. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
The aim was to study the different strategies used to implement cardiovascular risk evaluation and management for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice. A questionnaire survey was performed among both the members of the international Trans-Atlantic Cardiovascular Risk Consortium for Rheumatoid Arthritis (ATACC-RA) as well as the Survey of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF) in patients with RA (SURF-RA) group. The questionnaire included 18 questions with the overarching topics: (1) organization and responsibility of cardiovascular risk management (CVRM); (2) screening of CVD-RFs; (3) overview current CVRM status; and (4) availability of data regarding CVRM. Based on the answers, two researchers (JW, PR) independently categorized the different strategies. Thirteen out of 27 rheumatology centers responded to the questionnaire. One rheumatology center did not have organized CVRM for their RA patients. Among the other centers, three strategies to organize CVRM in daily practice were distinguished: (1) the rheumatologist performs CVRM during outpatient visits (n = 6); (2) cardiologists and rheumatologists co-operate in a cardio-rheuma-clinic/team with different tasks and responsibilities (n = 3); and (3) the general practitioner screens and intervenes on CVD-RFs (n = 3). Each CVRM strategy was based on agreements between medical professionals and was also dependent on the national healthcare system and available financial resources. Three strategies were identified for CVRM implementation in daily clinical practice based on who is primarily responsible for performing CVRM. More research is warranted to compare their relative merits and effectiveness in relation to CVRM.
目的是研究在日常临床实践中用于对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者实施心血管风险评估和管理的不同策略。对国际类风湿关节炎跨大西洋心血管风险联盟(ATACC - RA)的成员以及类风湿关节炎患者心血管疾病风险因素调查(SURF - RA)组进行了问卷调查。问卷包含18个问题,主要主题有:(1)心血管风险管理(CVRM)的组织和职责;(2)心血管疾病风险因素(CVD - RFs)的筛查;(3)当前CVRM状况概述;(4)CVRM相关数据的可用性。根据答案,两位研究人员(JW,PR)独立对不同策略进行了分类。27个风湿病中心中有13个回复了问卷。一个风湿病中心没有为其RA患者组织CVRM。在其他中心中,区分出了日常实践中组织CVRM的三种策略:(1)风湿病医生在门诊就诊时进行CVRM(n = 6);(2)心脏病医生和风湿病医生在一个具有不同任务和职责的心血管 - 风湿病诊所/团队中合作(n = 3);(3)全科医生筛查并干预CVD - RFs(n = 3)。每种CVRM策略都基于医疗专业人员之间的协议,并且还取决于国家医疗保健系统和可用的财政资源。根据谁主要负责进行CVRM,确定了日常临床实践中实施CVRM的三种策略。有必要进行更多研究以比较它们在CVRM方面的相对优点和有效性。