• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相情感障碍多基因风险评分的经验探索与理解

Exploration of experiences with and understanding of polygenic risk scores for bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Putt Sophie, Yanes Tatiane, Meiser Bettina, Kaur Rajneesh, Fullerton Janice M, Barlow-Stewart Kristine, Schofield Peter R, Toma Claudio, Peay Holly, Mitchell Philip B

机构信息

University of New South Wales Medicine, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.037. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.037
PMID:32090758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) summarise genetic risk in complex genetic disorders such as bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study was to gain in-depth, nuanced information regarding the understanding and experience of receiving a PRS for BD from individuals who already have a BD diagnosis.

METHODS

Participants from a previous genetics study were invited to receive their PRS in a face-to-face consultation with a genetic counsellor or psychiatrist. Four weeks later, semi-structured interviews were conducted, with 14 'acceptors' (those who chose to receive their PRS) and 4 'decliners' (those who did not wish to receive their PRS).

RESULTS

Four themes were developed: (1) An easy decision, (2) A positive experience, (3) The grey area, and (4) The future is exciting and frightening. Despite some reported initial shock and distress, all acceptors described the experience of receiving their PRS as a positive one. It allowed them to better understand their condition and/or reduced feelings of self-blame. Decliners chose not to receive their results because of a lack of perceived usefulness or concern that PRS may hinder personal recovery.

LIMITATIONS

Given the qualitative design of the study, statistically valid generalisations cannot be undertaken, nor can causal relationships be established.

CONCLUSIONS

PRS for BD were generally well accepted and understood. Knowledge regarding the impact of PRS for BD ensures that counselling frameworks are responsive to patient needs as well as informing education for psychiatrists and genetic counsellors, who will play pivotal roles in future polygenic testing provision.

摘要

背景

多基因风险评分(PRS)总结了双相情感障碍(BD)等复杂遗传疾病中的遗传风险。本研究的目的是从已被诊断患有双相情感障碍的个体那里获取有关接受双相情感障碍PRS的理解和体验的深入、细致入微的信息。

方法

邀请先前一项遗传学研究的参与者在与遗传咨询师或精神科医生的面对面咨询中接受他们的PRS。四周后,对14名“接受者”(选择接受其PRS的人)和4名“拒绝者”(不希望接受其PRS的人)进行了半结构化访谈。

结果

形成了四个主题:(1)轻松的决定,(2)积极的体验,(3)灰色地带,以及(4)未来既令人兴奋又令人恐惧。尽管一些人报告最初有震惊和痛苦,但所有接受者都将接受PRS的经历描述为积极的。这使他们能够更好地了解自己的病情和/或减轻自责感。拒绝者选择不接受他们的结果,是因为认为没有用处,或者担心PRS可能会阻碍个人康复。

局限性

鉴于该研究的定性设计,无法进行具有统计学有效性的概括,也无法建立因果关系。

结论

双相情感障碍的PRS总体上被很好地接受和理解。关于双相情感障碍PRS影响的知识确保咨询框架能够响应患者需求,并为精神科医生和遗传咨询师的教育提供信息,他们将在未来的多基因检测提供中发挥关键作用。

相似文献

1
Exploration of experiences with and understanding of polygenic risk scores for bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍多基因风险评分的经验探索与理解
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:342-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.037. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
2
Comparison of Genetic Liability for Sleep Traits Among Individuals With Bipolar Disorder I or II and Control Participants.双相障碍 I 或 II 患者与对照参与者的睡眠特征遗传易感性比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):303-310. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4079.
3
Combining schizophrenia and depression polygenic risk scores improves the genetic prediction of lithium response in bipolar disorder patients.将精神分裂症和抑郁症的多基因风险评分相结合,可提高双相情感障碍患者锂反应的遗传预测。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 29;11(1):606. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01702-2.
4
Dissecting clinical heterogeneity of bipolar disorder using multiple polygenic risk scores.使用多个多基因风险评分剖析双相情感障碍的临床异质性。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 18;10(1):314. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00996-y.
5
Interplay between polygenic risk for mood disorders and stressful life events in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍中情绪障碍的多基因风险与应激性生活事件之间的相互作用。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 1;350:565-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.167. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Polygenic risk scores distinguish patients from non-affected adult relatives and from normal controls in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder multi-affected kindreds.在精神分裂症和双相情感障碍多患病家系中,多基因风险评分可区分患者与未患病的成年亲属以及正常对照。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018 Apr;177(3):329-336. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32614. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Multiple psychiatric polygenic risk scores predict associations between childhood adversity and bipolar disorder.多项精神疾病多基因风险评分可预测儿童期逆境与双相情感障碍之间的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Nov 15;341:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.116. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
8
Polygenic Risk and Progression to Bipolar or Psychotic Disorders Among Individuals Diagnosed With Unipolar Depression in Early Life.早发性单相抑郁患者的多基因风险与双相或精神病性障碍的进展。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;177(10):936-943. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111195. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Polygenic risk score for bipolar disorder associates with divergent thinking and brain structures in the prefrontal cortex.双相障碍的多基因风险评分与前额叶皮层的发散思维和脑结构有关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Dec 15;42(18):6028-6037. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25667. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Schizophrenia and Bipolar Polygenic Risk Scores in Relation to Intracranial Volume.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的多基因风险评分与颅内体积的关系。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;13(4):695. doi: 10.3390/genes13040695.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and social issues in prediction of risk of severe mental illness: a scoping review and thematic analysis.严重精神疾病风险预测中的伦理和社会问题:一项范围综述与主题分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;25(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06949-3.
2
Development and validation of the Vanderbilt PRS-KS, an instrument to quantify polygenic risk score knowledge.范德比尔特PRS-KS的开发与验证,一种用于量化多基因风险评分知识的工具。
Genet Med Open. 2023 Jun 1;1(1):100822. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100822. eCollection 2023.
3
Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: a systematic review of stakeholders' perspectives, attitudes, and experiences.
临床中的多基因风险评分:对利益相关者观点、态度和经历的系统评价
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;33(3):266-280. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01747-z. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
4
Psychological state at the time of psychiatric genetic counseling impacts patient empowerment: A pre-post analysis.精神科遗传咨询时的心理状态对患者赋权的影响:一项前后分析。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1949. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1949. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
5
Addressing the ethical and societal challenges posed by genome-wide association studies of behavioral and brain-related traits.解决全基因组关联研究行为和大脑相关特征所带来的伦理和社会挑战。
Nat Neurosci. 2023 Jun;26(6):932-941. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01333-4. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
A qualitative study exploring the consumer experience of receiving self-initiated polygenic risk scores from a third-party website.一项探索消费者自身从第三方网站获取多基因风险评分的体验的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;31(4):424-429. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01203-w. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
7
Perceptions of causal attribution and attitudes to genetic testing among people with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives.精神分裂症患者及其一级亲属对因果归因的看法和对基因检测的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Oct;30(10):1147-1154. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01116-8. Epub 2022 May 16.
8
Perspectives of diverse Spanish- and English-speaking patients on the clinical use of polygenic risk scores.西班牙语和英语患者对多基因风险评分临床应用的看法。
Genet Med. 2022 Jun;24(6):1217-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 5.