• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实时反馈可提高院外心脏骤停患者的胸外按压质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229431. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0229431
PMID:32092113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7039459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines underline the importance of high-quality chest compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), to improve outcomes. Contrary to this many studies show that chest compression is often carried out poorly in clinical practice, and long interruptions in compression are observed. This prospective cohort study aimed to analyse whether chest compression quality changes when a real-time feedback system is used to provide simultaneous audiovisual feedback on chest compression quality. For this purpose, pauses in compression, compression frequency and compression depth were compared.

METHODS

The study included 292 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in three consecutive study groups: first group, conventional resuscitation (no-sensor CPR); second group, using a feedback sensor to collect compression depth data without real-time feedback (sensor-only CPR); and third group, with real-time feedback on compression quality (sensor-feedback CPR). Pauses and frequency were analysed using compression artefacts on electrocardiography, and compression depth was measured using the feedback sensor. With this data, various parameters were determined in order to be able to compare the chest compression quality between the three consecutive groups.

RESULTS

The compression fraction increased with sensor-only CPR (group 2) in comparison with no-sensor CPR (group 1) (80.1% vs. 87.49%; P < 0.001), but there were no further differences belonging compression fraction after activation of sensor-feedback CPR (group 3) (P = 1.00). Compression frequency declined over the three study groups, reaching the guideline recommendations (127.81 comp/min vs. 122.96 comp/min, P = 0.02 vs. 119.15 comp/min, P = 0.008) after activation of sensor-feedback CPR (group 3). Mean compression depth only changed minimally with sensor-feedback (52.49 mm vs. 54.66 mm; P = 0.16), but the fraction of compressions with sufficient depth (at least 5 cm) and compressions within the recommended 5-6 cm increased significantly with sensor-feedback CPR (56.90% vs. 71.03%; P = 0.003 and 28.74% vs. 43.97%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The real-time feedback system improved chest compression quality regarding pauses in compression and compression frequency and facilitated compliance with the guideline recommendations. Compression depth did not change significantly after activation of the real-time feedback. Even the sole use of a CPR-feedback-sensor ("sensor-only CPR") improved performance regarding pauses in compression and compression frequency, a phenomenon known as the 'Hawthorne effect'. Based on this data real-time feedback systems can be expected to raise the quality level in some parts of chest compression quality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organisation and German Register of Clinical Trials (DRKS00009903), Registered 09 February 2016 (retrospectively registered).

摘要

背景

目前的指南强调在心肺复苏(CPR)期间高质量的胸部按压的重要性,以改善结果。然而,许多研究表明,在临床实践中,胸部按压往往做得很差,并且经常观察到长时间的按压中断。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在分析使用实时反馈系统同时提供胸部按压质量的视听反馈时,胸部按压质量是否会发生变化。为此,比较了按压暂停、按压频率和按压深度。

方法

该研究包括三个连续研究组的 292 例院外心脏骤停:第一组,常规复苏(无传感器 CPR);第二组,使用反馈传感器收集按压深度数据但没有实时反馈(仅传感器 CPR);第三组,具有实时反馈的按压质量(传感器反馈 CPR)。使用心电图上的按压伪影分析暂停和频率,使用反馈传感器测量按压深度。使用这些数据,可以确定各种参数,以便能够比较三个连续组之间的胸部按压质量。

结果

与无传感器 CPR(组 1)相比,仅传感器 CPR(组 2)的按压分数增加(80.1%比 87.49%;P < 0.001),但在激活传感器反馈 CPR(组 3)后,按压分数没有进一步增加(P = 1.00)。在三个研究组中,按压频率逐渐下降,达到指南推荐的频率(127.81 次/分钟比 122.96 次/分钟,P = 0.02 比 119.15 次/分钟,P = 0.008),然后激活传感器反馈 CPR(组 3)。使用传感器反馈时,平均按压深度仅略有变化(52.49 毫米比 54.66 毫米;P = 0.16),但足够深度的按压比例(至少 5 厘米)和在推荐的 5-6 厘米范围内的按压比例显著增加与传感器反馈 CPR(56.90%比 71.03%;P = 0.003 和 28.74%比 43.97%;P < 0.001)。

结论

实时反馈系统提高了胸部按压质量,减少了按压暂停和按压频率,并有助于符合指南建议。激活实时反馈后,按压深度没有明显变化。即使仅使用 CPR 反馈传感器(“仅传感器 CPR”)也能改善按压暂停和按压频率方面的表现,这种现象被称为“霍桑效应”。基于这些数据,可以预期实时反馈系统可以在某些方面提高胸部按压质量水平。

试验注册

世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和德国临床试验注册处(DRKS00009903),2016 年 2 月 9 日注册(追溯注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/916e24c69bea/pone.0229431.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/d704ae35be22/pone.0229431.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/c47604522bdf/pone.0229431.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/0d1f2a59bbac/pone.0229431.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/379df094063f/pone.0229431.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/916e24c69bea/pone.0229431.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/d704ae35be22/pone.0229431.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/c47604522bdf/pone.0229431.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/0d1f2a59bbac/pone.0229431.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/379df094063f/pone.0229431.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9558/7039459/916e24c69bea/pone.0229431.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Real-time feedback improves chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective cohort study.实时反馈可提高院外心脏骤停患者的胸外按压质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0229431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229431. eCollection 2020.
2
Chest compression depth after change in CPR guidelines--improved but not sufficient.心肺复苏指南变更后胸外按压深度——有所改善但仍不充分。
Resuscitation. 2014 Apr;85(4):503-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.12.030. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
3
Impacts of chest compression cycle length and real-time feedback with a CPRmeter® on chest compression quality in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled factorial plan trial.体外心脏骤停中胸外按压周期长度和使用 CPRmeter® 的实时反馈对胸外按压质量的影响:一项多中心随机对照析因计划试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 8;21(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04536-3.
4
Continuous chest compression versus interrupted chest compression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of non-asphyxial out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.持续胸外按压与间断胸外按压用于非窒息性院外心脏骤停心肺复苏的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 27;3(3):CD010134. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010134.pub2.
5
Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation during real-life out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时旁观者心肺复苏的质量。
Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 10.
6
Association of Real-Time Feedback and Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation Quality Delivered by Ambulance Personnel for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.实时反馈与救护车人员院外心脏骤停心肺复苏质量的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e029457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029457. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
7
The influence of scenario-based training and real-time audiovisual feedback on out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.基于情景的培训和实时视听反馈对院外心肺复苏质量和院外心脏骤停存活率的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):47-56.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Pauses in compressions during pediatric CPR: Opportunities for improving CPR quality.儿科心肺复苏术(CPR)中的按压中断:改善 CPR 质量的机会。
Resuscitation. 2019 Dec;145:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
9
Mechanical chest compressions improved aspects of CPR in the LINC trial.在 LINC 试验中,机械胸外按压改善了心肺复苏术的某些方面。
Resuscitation. 2015 Jun;91:116-21. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.028. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
10
Quality of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with real time automated feedback: a prospective interventional study.实时自动反馈的院外心肺复苏质量:一项前瞻性干预研究。
Resuscitation. 2006 Dec;71(3):283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.05.011. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Different Feedback Devices in the Survival of Patients in Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.不同反馈设备在心脏骤停患者生存中的作用:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 8;13(19):5989. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195989.
2
Real-time feedback for CPR quality - A scoping review.心肺复苏质量的实时反馈——一项范围综述。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jul 31;19:100730. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100730. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Designing Chinese hospital emergency departments to leverage artificial intelligence-a systematic literature review on the challenges and opportunities.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of chest compression frequency on the quality of resuscitation by lifeguards. A prospective randomized crossover multicenter simulation trial.救生员胸外按压频率对复苏质量的影响。一项前瞻性随机交叉多中心模拟试验。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(6):769-776. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0121. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Chest compression rates and pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest survival outcomes.胸外按压频率与儿科院内心搏骤停患者的生存结局。
Resuscitation. 2018 Sep;130:159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
A better understanding of ambulance personnel's attitude towards real-time resuscitation feedback.
设计中国医院急诊科以利用人工智能——关于挑战与机遇的系统文献综述
Front Med Technol. 2024 Mar 21;6:1307625. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1307625. eCollection 2024.
4
Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心肺复苏实时视听反馈设备能否改善患者预后?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
World J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):531-541. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i10.531.
5
Association of Real-Time Feedback and Cardiopulmonary-Resuscitation Quality Delivered by Ambulance Personnel for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.实时反馈与救护车人员院外心脏骤停心肺复苏质量的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e029457. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029457. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
The effect of audiovisual feedback of monitor/defibrillators on percentage of appropriate compression depth and rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.监视器/除颤器的视听反馈对心肺复苏期间按压深度和频率合适比例的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02304-9.
7
Comparison of real-time feedback and debriefing by video recording on basic life support skill in nursing students.比较护理学生基础生命支持技能的实时反馈和视频记录的反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03951-1.
8
Defining and evaluating the Hawthorne effect in primary care, a systematic review and meta-analysis.界定与评估初级保健中的霍桑效应:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 8;9:1033486. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1033486. eCollection 2022.
9
The impact of cognitive aids on resuscitation performance in in-hospital cardiac arrest scenarios: a systematic review and meta-analysis.认知辅助工具对院内心脏骤停场景中复苏表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;17(7):2143-2158. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03041-6. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
10
Impact of the Over-the-Head Position with a Supraglottic Airway Device on Chest Compression Depth and Rate: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.使用声门上气道装置的过头位对胸外按压深度和速率的影响:一项随机对照试验的事后分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;10(4):718. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040718.
更好地了解救护人员对实时复苏反馈的态度。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Mar 1;30(2):110-117. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx189.
4
Mortality after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a Spanish Region.西班牙某地区院外心脏骤停后的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0175818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175818. eCollection 2017.
5
Metrics save lives: value and hurdles faced.指标拯救生命:价值和面临的障碍。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Jun;23(3):204-208. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000408.
6
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 2. Adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.《2015年欧洲复苏委员会复苏指南:第2部分. 成人基础生命支持和自动体外除颤》
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:81-99. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
7
Understanding the Hawthorne effect.理解霍桑效应。
BMJ. 2015 Sep 4;351:h4672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4672.
8
Association Between Chest Compression Interruptions and Clinical Outcomes of Ventricular Fibrillation Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.胸部按压中断与院外室颤性心脏骤停临床结局的关联。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 15;132(11):1030-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.014016. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
9
Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停后的胸外按压频率与生存率
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):840-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000824.
10
Quantification of the Hawthorne effect in hand hygiene compliance monitoring using an electronic monitoring system: a retrospective cohort study.使用电子监测系统对手部卫生依从性监测中霍桑效应的量化:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):974-80. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003080. Epub 2014 Jul 7.