Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1279-1285. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16381. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Decision making in financial and healthcare matters is of critical importance for well-being in old age. Preliminary work suggests racial differences in decision making; however, the factors that drive racial differences in decision making remain unclear. We hypothesized literacy, particularly financial and health literacy, mediates racial differences in decision making.
Community-based epidemiologic cohort study.
Communities in northeastern Illinois.
Nondemented Black participants (N = 138) of the Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center Minority Aging Research Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project who completed decision-making and literacy measures were matched to White participants (N = 138) according to age, education, sex, and global cognition using Mahalanobis distance (total N = 276).
All participants completed clinical assessments, a decision-making measure that resembles real-world materials relevant to finance and healthcare, and a financial and health literacy measure. Regression models were used to examine racial differences in decision making and test the hypothesis that literacy mediates this association. In secondary analyses, we examined the impact of literacy in specific domains of decision making (financial and healthcare).
In models adjusted for age, education, sex, and global cognition, older Black adults performed lower than older White adults on literacy (β = -8.20; SE = 1.34; 95% CI = -10.82 to -5.57; P < .01) and separately on decision making (β = -.80; SE = .23; 95% CI = -1.25 to -.34; P < .01). However, when decision making was regressed on both race and literacy, the association of race was attenuated and became nonsignificant (β = -.45; SE = .24; 95% CI = -.93 to .02; P = .06), but literacy remained significantly associated with decision making (β = .04; SE = .01; 95% CI = .02-.06; P < .01). In secondary models, a similar pattern was observed for both financial and healthcare decision making.
Racial differences in decision making are largely mediated by literacy. These findings suggest that efforts to improve literacy may help reduce racial differences in decision making and improve health and well-being for diverse populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1279-1285, 2020.
背景/目的:在老年时,财务和医疗保健方面的决策对于幸福至关重要。初步研究表明,决策存在种族差异;然而,导致决策出现种族差异的因素尚不清楚。我们假设,读写能力(尤其是金融和健康方面的读写能力)可以调解决策方面的种族差异。
基于社区的流行病学队列研究。
伊利诺伊州东北部的社区。
参加拉什阿尔茨海默病中心少数族裔衰老研究和拉什记忆与衰老项目、完成决策和读写能力测试的未患痴呆的黑人参与者(N=138),根据年龄、教育程度、性别和全球认知,使用马哈拉诺比斯距离(总 N=276)与白人参与者(N=138)相匹配。
所有参与者均完成临床评估、一项类似于与金融和医疗保健相关的现实世界材料的决策测试以及一项金融和健康读写能力测试。回归模型用于检验决策中的种族差异,并检验读写能力在其中起中介作用的假设。在二次分析中,我们研究了读写能力在决策特定领域(金融和医疗保健)中的影响。
在调整年龄、教育程度、性别和全球认知的模型中,黑人老年参与者的读写能力(β=-8.20;SE=1.34;95%置信区间=-10.82 至-5.57;P<.01)和决策能力(β=-0.80;SE=0.23;95%置信区间=-1.25 至-0.34;P<.01)均低于白人老年参与者。然而,当决策能力同时回归种族和读写能力时,种族的关联减弱且变得无统计学意义(β=-0.45;SE=0.24;95%置信区间=-0.93 至 0.02;P=0.06),但读写能力仍与决策能力显著相关(β=0.04;SE=0.01;95%置信区间=0.02-0.06;P<.01)。在次要模型中,金融和医疗保健决策中也观察到类似的模式。
决策中的种族差异主要由读写能力介导。这些发现表明,提高读写能力的努力可能有助于减少决策中的种族差异,并改善不同人群的健康和幸福感。美国老年医学会杂志 68:1279-1285,2020 年。