Suppr超能文献

风湿性心脏病患者的生活体验:系统文献回顾中的声音

Voices behind the Statistics: A Systematic Literature Review of the Lived Experience of Rheumatic Heart Disease.

机构信息

School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth 6000, Australia.

Telethon Kids Institute, 6000 Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041347.

Abstract

In Australia, Aboriginal children almost entirely bear the burden of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) which often leads to rheumatic heart disease (RHD), a significant marker of inequity in Indigenous and non-Indigenous health experiences. Efforts to eradicate RHD have been unsuccessful partly due to lack of attention to voices, opinions and understandings of the people behind the statistics. This systematic review presents a critical, interpretive analysis of publications that include lived experiences of RHD. The review approach was strengths-based, informed by privileging Indigenous knowledges, perspectives and experiences, and drawing on Postcolonialism and Critical Race Theory. Fifteen publications were analysed. Nine themes were organised into three domains which interact synergistically: sociological, disease specific and health service factors. A secondary sociolinguistic analysis of quotes within the publications articulated the combined impact of these factors as 'collective trauma'. Paucity of qualitative literature and a strong biomedical focus in the dominant narratives regarding RHD limited the findings from the reviewed publications. Noteworthy omissions included: experiences of children/adolescents; evidence of Indigenous priorities and perspectives for healthcare; discussions of power; recognition of the centrality of Indigenous knowledges and strengths; and lack of critical reflection on impacts of a dominant biomedical approach to healthcare. Privileging a biomedical approach alone is to continue colonising Indigenous healthcare.

摘要

在澳大利亚,原住民儿童几乎完全承受着急性风湿热(ARF)的负担,而急性风湿热往往会导致风湿性心脏病(RHD),这是原住民和非原住民健康经历不平等的一个重要标志。消除 RHD 的努力一直没有成功,部分原因是没有关注统计数据背后人们的声音、意见和理解。本系统评价对包含 RHD 生活经历的出版物进行了批判性、解释性分析。该评价方法基于优势,以重视原住民知识、观点和经验为基础,并借鉴后殖民主义和批判种族理论。分析了 15 篇出版物。九个主题被组织成三个相互作用的领域:社会学、疾病特异性和卫生服务因素。对出版物中引语的二次社会语言学分析阐述了这些因素的综合影响,即“集体创伤”。关于 RHD 的定性文献不足,以及占主导地位的叙述中强烈的生物医学焦点,限制了从审查出版物中得出的结论。值得注意的遗漏包括:儿童/青少年的经历;对医疗保健的原住民优先事项和观点的证据;权力讨论;对原住民知识和优势的核心地位的认识;以及对主导生物医学方法对医疗保健的影响缺乏批判性反思。仅仅优先考虑生物医学方法就是继续对原住民医疗保健进行殖民化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e096/7068492/ad8cce908069/ijerph-17-01347-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验