Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brain Connect. 2020 Mar;10(2):53-71. doi: 10.1089/brain.2019.0715.
Response variability between individuals (interindividual variability) and within individuals (intraindividual variability) is an important issue in the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) literature. This has raised questions of the validity of TMS to assess changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) in a predictable and reliable manner. Several participant-specific factors contribute to this observed response variability with a current lack of consensus on the degree each factor contributes. This highlights a need for consistency and structure in reporting study designs and methodologies. Currently, there is no summarized review of the participant-specific factors that can be controlled and may contribute to response variability. This systematic review aimed to develop a checklist of methodological measures taken by previously published research to increase the homogeneity of participant selection criteria, preparation of participants before experimental testing, participant scheduling, and the instructions given to participants throughout experimental testing to minimize their effect on response variability. Seven databases were searched in full. Studies were included if CSE was measured via TMS and included methodological measures to increase the homogeneity of the participants. Eighty-four studies were included. Twenty-three included measures to increase participant selection homogeneity, 21 included measures to increase participant preparation homogeneity, while 61 included measures to increase participant scheduling and instructions during experimental testing homogeneity. These methodological measures were summarized into a user-friendly checklist with considerations, suggestions, and rationale/justification for their inclusion. This may provide the framework for further insights into ways to reduce response variability in TMS research.
个体间(个体内变异性)和个体内(个体内变异性)的反应变异性是经颅磁刺激(TMS)文献中的一个重要问题。这引发了关于 TMS 评估皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)变化的有效性的问题,因为这种变化以可预测和可靠的方式发生。几个与参与者相关的因素导致了这种观察到的反应变异性,目前对于每个因素的贡献程度尚未达成共识。这凸显了报告研究设计和方法学的一致性和结构性的必要性。目前,没有关于可以控制并可能导致反应变异性的参与者特异性因素的综合综述。本系统综述旨在制定一份清单,列出以前发表的研究中采取的方法学措施,以提高参与者选择标准、实验测试前的准备、参与者安排以及整个实验测试过程中给予参与者的指令的同质性,从而最大限度地减少其对反应变异性的影响。对七个数据库进行了全面搜索。如果 CSE 通过 TMS 测量并且包括提高参与者同质性的方法学措施,则纳入研究。共纳入 84 项研究。23 项研究纳入了提高参与者选择同质性的措施,21 项研究纳入了提高参与者准备同质性的措施,而 61 项研究纳入了提高实验测试期间参与者安排和指令同质性的措施。这些方法学措施被总结为一个易于使用的清单,并考虑了其纳入的考虑因素、建议和理由/依据。这可能为进一步深入了解如何减少 TMS 研究中的反应变异性提供了框架。