Gallagher Robyn, Ferry Cate, Candelaria Dion, Ladak Laila, Zecchin Robert
Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
National Heart Foundation of Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Sep;29(9):1397-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Australia, unlike most high-income countries, does not have published benchmarks for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) delivery. This study provides cross-state data on CR delivery for initial benchmarks and assesses performance against international minimal standards.
A prospective observational study March-May 2017 of CR programs in NSW (n=36), Tasmania (n=2) and ACT (n=1) was undertaken. Data were collected on 11 indicators (published dictionary), then classified as higher or lower performing using the UK National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation (NACR) criteria. Equity of access to higher performing CR was assessed using logistic regression.
Participants (n=2,436) had a mean age of 66.06±12.54 years, 68.9% were male, 16.2% culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and 2.6% Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. At patient level, waiting time was median 15 (Interquartile range [IQR] 9-25) days, 24.3% had an assessment before starting, 41.8% on completion, a median 12 sessions (IQR 6-16) were delivered, which 59.1% completed and 75.4% were linked to ongoing care. At program level, using NACR criteria, 18.0% were classified as higher performing and ≥87.1% met waiting time criteria, however, only 20.5% met duration criteria. Evidence of inequitable access to higher performing programs was present with substantially higher odds for participants living in major cities (OR 28.11 95%CI 18.41, 44.92) and with every decade younger age (OR 1.89-2.94) and lower odds by 89.0% for principal referral hospital-based services (OR 0.11 95%CI 0.08, 0.14) and 31.0% for people having a CALD background (OR 0.69 95%CI 0.49, 0.97).
This study provides initial national CR performance benchmarks for quality improvement in Australia. While wait times are minimised, few programs are higher performing or met minimum duration standards. There is an urgent need to resource and support CR quality and access outside of major cities, in principal referral hospitals and for older and diverse patients.
与大多数高收入国家不同,澳大利亚没有已发布的心脏康复(CR)服务基准。本研究提供跨州的CR服务数据以建立初始基准,并对照国际最低标准评估服务表现。
2017年3月至5月对新南威尔士州(n = 36)、塔斯马尼亚州(n = 2)和澳大利亚首都直辖区(n = 1)的CR项目进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。收集了11项指标(已发布的词典)的数据,然后根据英国心脏康复国家审计(NACR)标准分为表现较高或较低两类。使用逻辑回归评估获得较高质量CR服务的公平性。
参与者(n = 2436)的平均年龄为66.06±12.54岁,68.9%为男性,16.2%为文化和语言多元化(CALD)群体,2.6%为原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民。在患者层面,等待时间中位数为15天(四分位间距[IQR]9 - 25),24.3%在开始前进行了评估,41.8%在结束时进行了评估,提供的疗程中位数为12次(IQR 6 - 16),其中59.1%完成了疗程,75.4%与后续护理相关。在项目层面,根据NACR标准,18.0%被归类为表现较高,≥87.1%符合等待时间标准,然而,只有2