Suppr超能文献

客观测量的身体行为与颈痛和/或腰痛的关联:系统综述。

Association between objectively measured physical behaviour and neck- and/or low back pain: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2020 Jul;24(6):1007-1022. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1551. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical guidelines recommend physical activity to manage neck pain (NP) and low back pain (LBP). However, studies used to support these guidelines are based on self-reports of physical behaviour, which are prone to bias and misclassification. This systematic review aimed to investigate associations between objectively measured physical behaviour and the risk or prognosis of NP and/or LBP.

DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus from their inception until 18 January 2019. We considered prospective cohort studies for eligibility. Article selection, data extraction and critical appraisal were carried out by independent reviewers. Results were stratified on activity/sedentariness.

RESULTS

Ten articles out of 897 unique records identified met the inclusion criteria, of which eight studied working populations with mainly blue-collar workers. The overall results indicate that increased sitting time at work reduces the risk of NP and LBP while increased physical activity during work and/or leisure increases the risk of these conditions among blue-collar workers; however, associations were weak. Physical activity was not associated with prognosis of LBP (no studies investigated prognosis of NP). Most of the included articles have methodological shortcomings.

CONCLUSIONS

This review indicates that, among blue-collar workers, increased sitting at work may protect against NP and LBP while increased physical activity during work and/or leisure may increase this risk. There was no evidence supporting physical activity as a prognostic factor for LBP. Findings should be interpreted with caution due to the weak associations and few available studies with methodological shortcomings.

SIGNIFICANCE

Based on prospective cohort studies with objectively measured physical behaviour, this review questions the common notion that increased physical activity is associated with reduced risk or better prognosis of NP and/or LBP. We found that, among blue-collar workers, increased sitting time at work reduces the risk of NP and LBP, whereas physical activity somewhat increases the risk. Despite methodological shortcomings, there was consistency in the direction of the results, although high-quality articles reported the weakest associations. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018100765.

摘要

背景和目的

临床指南建议通过身体活动来管理颈部疼痛(NP)和下腰痛(LBP)。然而,用于支持这些指南的研究基于身体行为的自我报告,这些报告容易出现偏差和分类错误。本系统评价旨在研究客观测量的身体行为与 NP 和/或 LBP 的风险或预后之间的关系。

数据库和数据处理

从建库到 2019 年 1 月 18 日,我们在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Scopus 中进行了文献检索。我们将符合条件的研究纳入前瞻性队列研究。文章选择、数据提取和关键评价由独立评审员进行。结果根据活动/久坐程度进行分层。

结果

从 897 条独特记录中筛选出 10 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中 8 篇研究了以蓝领工人为主的工作人群。总体结果表明,工作时久坐时间增加会降低 NP 和 LBP 的风险,而工作和/或休闲时体力活动增加会增加蓝领工人患这些疾病的风险;然而,相关性很弱。体力活动与 LBP 的预后无关(没有研究调查 NP 的预后)。大多数纳入的文章都存在方法学上的缺陷。

结论

本综述表明,在蓝领工人中,工作时久坐时间增加可能有助于预防 NP 和 LBP,而工作和/或休闲时增加体力活动可能会增加患这些疾病的风险。没有证据支持体力活动是 LBP 的预后因素。由于相关性较弱,且存在少数方法学上有缺陷的研究,因此应谨慎解释这些发现。

意义

基于具有客观测量身体行为的前瞻性队列研究,本综述对普遍认为的增加体力活动与降低 NP 和/或 LBP 的风险或改善预后有关的观点提出质疑。我们发现,在蓝领工人中,工作时久坐时间增加会降低 NP 和 LBP 的风险,而体力活动则会在某种程度上增加风险。尽管存在方法学上的缺陷,但结果的方向基本一致,尽管高质量的文章报告了最弱的相关性。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42018100765。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验