Suppr超能文献

重复性工作负荷是否是手术器械技工上肢肌肉骨骼障碍的危险因素?一项横断面分析。

Is Repetitive Workload a Risk Factor for Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders in Surgical Device Mechanics? A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Academic District Hospital, Zeppelinstrasse 21, 78532 Tuttlingen, Germany.

Office for Occupational and Hand Therapy, Neuhauser Strasse 85, 78532 Tuttlingen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 21;17(4):1383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041383.

Abstract

To assess the prevalence of upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among surgical device mechanics compared to a control group, a total of 70 employees were included and assigned to three occupational groups (grinders, packers, and control). Personal factors, work exposure, manual skill, and complaints were assessed by two self-administered questionnaires and an industry test. WMSDs were diagnosed in a standardised clinical examination. The two-one-sided -tests (TOST) procedure was used to test the clinical equivalence of the respective grinding and packaging groups vs. the control group in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Thirty-nine study participants (56%) experienced at least one WMSD at the elbow, forearm, and/or wrist, mainly with signs of epicondylitis and nerve entrapment at the medial elbow. The risk of grinders developing upper extremity WMSD was about 2.5-times higher and packers had an 8.6-fold higher risk of a clinically relevant DASH > 29 compared to the control group. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The groups were also proven to be clinically equivalent in terms of DASH score. Surgical device mechanics do not seem to have worse DASH values or be at higher risk of upper limb WMSDs compared to a control group. This is the first study to analyse and compare different workplaces in this industry that are also common in other industries.

摘要

为了评估与对照组相比,手术器械技工上肢与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSD)的患病率,共纳入 70 名员工,并将其分配到三个职业群体(研磨工、包装工和对照组)。个人因素、工作暴露、手工技能和投诉通过两份自我管理问卷和一项行业测试进行评估。WMSD 通过标准化临床检查进行诊断。使用双侧单边检验(TOST)程序来测试各自的研磨和包装组与对照组在手臂、肩部和/或手功能障碍(DASH)评分方面的临床等效性。39 名研究参与者(56%)至少在肘部、前臂和/或手腕处经历了一次 WMSD,主要表现为肘内侧的腱鞘炎和神经卡压迹象。与对照组相比,研磨工上肢 WMSD 的发病风险高约 2.5 倍,包装工的临床相关 DASH>29 的风险高 8.6 倍。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义。就 DASH 评分而言,这些组也被证明具有临床等效性。与对照组相比,手术器械技工似乎没有更高的 DASH 值或上肢 WMSD 的更高风险。这是第一项分析和比较该行业中不同工作场所的研究,这些工作场所也在其他行业中很常见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aee/7068592/ea8864051810/ijerph-17-01383-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验