• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们应该移植质量差的胚胎吗?

Should we transfer poor quality embryos?

作者信息

Kirillova Anastasia, Lysenkov Sergey, Farmakovskaya Maria, Kiseleva Yulia, Martazanova Bella, Mishieva Nona, Abubakirov Aydar, Sukhikh Gennady

机构信息

1Federal State Budget Institution "National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation", st. Academician Oparin 4, 4117513 Moscow, Russia.

2Department of Evolutionary Biology, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/12, 119991 Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Fertil Res Pract. 2020 Feb 19;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5
PMID:32099657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7031982/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos.

METHODS

It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student's t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively).

CONCLUSION

Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET).

摘要

背景

评估移植质量差的胚胎是否安全有效。

方法

这是一项使用个体患者数据并设阳性对照的回顾性分析。所有在2012年至2016年期间进行的新鲜体外受精(IVF)周期中,于第3天或第5天移植质量差的胚胎的患者。本研究评估了来自488个IVF程序的总共738个质量差的胚胎。在第3天进行了261次胚胎移植(移植了402个胚胎),在第5天进行了227次(移植了336个胚胎)。对照组由来自5994个IVF程序的9893个质量中等和良好的胚胎组成。使用R软件中的fisher.test函数通过双尾Fisher精确检验比较结局率。使用R中的binom.test函数通过Clopper-Pearson方法计算比例的95%置信区间。通过年龄、体重指数(BMI)、卵母细胞数量、女性和男性主要诊断、周期类型、控制性卵巢刺激(COS)方案、促性腺激素给药开始日、促性腺激素起始剂量、促性腺激素总剂量、促性腺激素给药总天数、促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂给药开始日、使用的GnRH激动剂安瓿总数、排卵触发日和排卵触发类型,对质量差与质量中等和良好的胚胎患者组进行比较,区间变量使用Student t检验,名义变量使用卡方检验。

结果

在第3天和第5天移植的质量差的胚胎组之间,在着床率、临床妊娠率、流产率、活产率和出生子女数量方面未发现显著差异。尽管质量差的胚胎组的着床率低于对照组(13.9%对37.2%),但两组中着床胚胎导致临床妊娠和活产的比例之间未观察到统计学显著差异(分别为72%对78.2%和55.8%对62.0%)。

结论

在第3天或第5天移植质量差的胚胎着床潜力较低,尽管那些成功着床的胚胎与质量中等和良好的胚胎有相同的活产潜力。本研究支持当质量差的胚胎是新鲜胚胎移植(ET)的唯一选择时,移植它们是安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/59e3d9791662/40738_2020_72_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/b7e2e378ffd9/40738_2020_72_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/424641db3d26/40738_2020_72_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/59e3d9791662/40738_2020_72_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/b7e2e378ffd9/40738_2020_72_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/424641db3d26/40738_2020_72_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89aa/7031982/59e3d9791662/40738_2020_72_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Should we transfer poor quality embryos?我们应该移植质量差的胚胎吗?
Fertil Res Pract. 2020 Feb 19;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5. eCollection 2020.
2
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.体外受精后胚胎移植数量指南,2006年9月,第182号
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007.
3
Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.1050名女性在一个辅助生殖技术周期(包括所有后续冻融周期)后的累积活产率:一项比较促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案的随机对照试验的次要结果。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):556-567. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew358.
4
Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的传统卵巢刺激和单胚胎移植。在利用所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎后,我们需要多少个卵母细胞才能使累积活产率最大化?
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
5
The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.黄体期刺激获得的整倍体囊胚与卵泡期刺激获得的囊胚具有相同的临床、产科和围产结局:一项多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2598-2608. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa203.
6
In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.体外受精与多胎妊娠:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1.
7
[Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in patients with risk of poor response to ovarian stimulation in IVF-ET].[促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案用于体外受精-胚胎移植中卵巢刺激反应不良风险患者]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2009 May;38(3):305-10. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2009.03.014.
8
Live birth rates after modified natural cycle compared with high-dose FSH stimulation using GnRH antagonists in poor responders.拮抗剂方案与高剂量促性腺激素刺激方案在卵巢低反应患者中应用的比较:改良自然周期与体外受精结局
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2321-30. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev198. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
9
Does prolonged pituitary down-regulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist improve the live-birth rate in in vitro fertilization treatment?促性腺激素释放激素激动剂延长垂体降调节是否能提高体外受精治疗的活产率?
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jul;102(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.030. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
10
Reduced oxygen concentration during human IVF culture improves embryo utilization and cumulative pregnancy rates per cycle.人类体外受精培养过程中降低氧气浓度可提高每个周期的胚胎利用率和累积妊娠率。
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Jan 22;2020(1):hoz036. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz036. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-standardized protein background in IVF media linked to serum-derived albumin supplementation.体外受精培养基中与血清源性白蛋白补充相关的非标准化蛋白质背景。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03616-0.
2
Clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer derived from low-quality day 3 embryos: A retrospective cohort study.来自低质量第3天胚胎的冻融单囊胚移植的临床结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 28;16:1583779. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1583779. eCollection 2025.
3
Label-free evaluation of mouse embryo quality using time-lapse bright field and optical coherence microscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Embryo biopsy and development: the known and the unknown.胚胎活检与发育:已知与未知。
Reproduction. 2017 Nov;154(5):R143-R148. doi: 10.1530/REP-17-0431. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.1730个活检囊胚的非整倍体、标准形态学评估与胚胎发育动力学之间的相关性:一项连续性病例系列研究
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2245-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew183. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
3
The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis.
使用延时明场和光学相干显微镜对小鼠胚胎质量进行无标记评估。
Commun Biol. 2025 Apr 15;8(1):612. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08044-5.
4
Embryo Transfer Procedural Parameters Do Not Predict IVF Cycle Outcome.胚胎移植程序参数无法预测体外受精周期结果。
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 26;13(5):1312. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051312.
5
Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes after Poor-Quality Embryo Transfer and Prognostic Parameters.低质量胚胎移植后的临床结局及预后参数评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 27;12(19):6236. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196236.
6
Embryo selection through artificial intelligence versus embryologists: a systematic review.通过人工智能与胚胎学家进行胚胎选择:一项系统综述。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Aug 15;2023(3):hoad031. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad031. eCollection 2023.
7
A hybrid artificial intelligence model leverages multi-centric clinical data to improve fetal heart rate pregnancy prediction across time-lapse systems.一种混合人工智能模型利用多中心临床数据,改善跨时间 lapse 系统的胎儿心率妊娠预测。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Apr 3;38(4):596-608. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead023.
8
Association of the Cumulative Live Birth Rate with the Factors in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Retrospective Study of 16,583 Women.累积活产率与辅助生殖技术相关因素的关联:对16583名女性的回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 6;12(2):493. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020493.
9
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-containing medium treatment after thawing improves blastocyst-transfer outcomes in the frozen- thawed blastocyst-transfer cycle.含粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子的培养基处理可改善冻融囊胚移植周期中囊胚解冻后的移植结局。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jun;39(6):1373-1381. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02493-1. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Disposition of embryos from women who only produced morphologically poor embryos on day three.第三天仅产生形态学较差胚胎的女性胚胎的处理。
Biomed J. 2022 Feb;45(1):190-199. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
活检对植入前基因诊断期间人类胚胎发育潜能的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7193075. doi: 10.1155/2016/7193075. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
Can repeated IVF-ICSI-cycles be avoided by using blastocysts developing from poor-quality cleavage stage embryos?通过使用由质量差的卵裂期胚胎发育而来的囊胚,能否避免重复进行体外受精-卵胞浆内单精子注射周期?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Mar;30(3):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
5
Congenital malformations, chromosomal abnormalities and perinatal results in IVF/ICSI newborns resulting from very poor quality embryos: a case-control study.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2015;79(2):83-9. doi: 10.1159/000353605. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
6
Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.标准囊胚形态、整倍体与着床的相关性:两个中心涉及 956 枚筛选囊胚的观察性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎的形态学和细胞遗传学评估。
Mol Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;20(2):117-26. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat073. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
8
Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.移植胚胎数量的标准:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):44-46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.038. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub4.
10
Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting.伊斯坦布尔胚胎评估共识工作坊:专家会议记录。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Jun;22(6):632-46. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Apr 11.