• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线购物与传统购物的快速消费品温室气体足迹比较:随机方法。

Comparative Greenhouse Gas Footprinting of Online versus Traditional Shopping for Fast-Moving Consumer Goods: A Stochastic Approach.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Environmental Modeling, Sensing and Analysis, TNO, Princetonlaan 6, 3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 17;54(6):3499-3509. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06252. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1021/acs.est.9b06252
PMID:32100529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7081612/
Abstract

Variability in consumer practices and choices is typically not addressed in comparisons of environmental impacts of traditional shopping and e-commerce. Here, we developed a stochastic model to quantify the variability in the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprints of product distribution and purchase of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) via three prevalent retail channels in the United Kingdom (U.K.). We found that shopping via bricks and clicks (click and fulfillment via physical store delivery) most likely decreases the GHG footprints when substituting traditional shopping, while FMCGs purchased through pure players with parcel delivery often have higher GHG footprints compared to those purchased via traditional retail. The number of items purchased and the last-mile travel distance are the dominant contributors to the variability in the GHG footprints of all three retail channels. We further showed that substituting delivery vans with electric cargo bikes can lead to a GHG emission reduction of 26% via parcel delivery. Finally, we showed the differences in the "last mile" GHG footprint of traditional shopping in the U.K. compared to three other countries (China, Netherlands, and the United States), which are primarily caused by the different shares of modes of transport (walking and by car, bus, and bike).

摘要

在传统购物和电子商务对环境影响的比较中,通常不会考虑消费者行为和选择的可变性。在这里,我们开发了一个随机模型,以量化通过英国(英国)三种流行的零售渠道(实体店配送和在线购买)分销和购买快速消费品(FMCG)的温室气体(GHG)足迹的可变性。我们发现,通过砖块和点击(通过实体店交付进行点击和履行)进行购物最有可能在替代传统购物时减少 GHG 足迹,而通过具有包裹配送的纯在线零售商购买的 FMCG 通常比通过传统零售商购买的 FMCG 具有更高的 GHG 足迹。购买的商品数量和最后一英里的旅行距离是所有三种零售渠道 GHG 足迹变化的主要因素。我们进一步表明,通过包裹配送,用电动货运自行车代替厢式送货车可减少 26%的 GHG 排放。最后,我们展示了英国传统购物的“最后一英里”GHG 足迹与其他三个国家(中国、荷兰和美国)之间的差异,这主要是由于运输方式(步行和汽车、公共汽车和自行车)的不同份额造成的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/c390c99bc1bc/es9b06252_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/84ccdf0612b3/es9b06252_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/eac74a5c4eac/es9b06252_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/8e38d1794cda/es9b06252_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/c390c99bc1bc/es9b06252_0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/84ccdf0612b3/es9b06252_0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/eac74a5c4eac/es9b06252_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/8e38d1794cda/es9b06252_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c52d/7081612/c390c99bc1bc/es9b06252_0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Greenhouse Gas Footprinting of Online versus Traditional Shopping for Fast-Moving Consumer Goods: A Stochastic Approach.在线购物与传统购物的快速消费品温室气体足迹比较:随机方法。
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 17;54(6):3499-3509. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06252. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Impacts of Behavioral, Organizational, and Spatial Factors on the Carbon Footprint of Traditional Retail and E-commerce in the Paris Region.行为、组织和空间因素对巴黎地区传统零售和电子商务碳足迹的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 30;58(17):7325-7334. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01901. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
Carbon Footprint of Alternative Grocery Shopping and Transportation Options from Retail Distribution Centers to Customer.从零售配送中心到客户的替代食品杂货购物和交通选择的碳足迹。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Aug 16;56(16):11798-11806. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02050. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Comparison on greenhouse gas footprint of three types of oriented strand board manufacturing process in China.中国三种定向结构板制造工艺的温室气体足迹比较。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(32):78793-78801. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28003-z. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Scale, distribution and variations of global greenhouse gas emissions driven by U.S. households.美国居民生活导致的全球温室气体排放的规模、分布和变化。
Environ Int. 2019 Dec;133(Pt A):105137. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105137. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Integrating the inter- and intra-annual dynamic features of capital into environmental footprint assessment: Revisiting China's greenhouse gas footprints, 1995-2015.将资本的跨年度和年度内动态特征纳入环境足迹评估:重新审视中国 1995-2015 年的温室气体足迹。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149629. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149629. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
7
Mortality, greenhouse gas emissions and consumer cost impacts of combined diet and physical activity scenarios: a health impact assessment study.饮食和身体活动综合情景对死亡率、温室气体排放和消费者成本的影响:一项健康影响评估研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 22;7(2):e014199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014199.
8
A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.高产封闭式奶牛场和草地奶牛场牛奶碳足迹的案例研究。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Mar;97(3):1835-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7174. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Understanding Variability To Reduce the Energy and GHG Footprints of U.S. Ethylene Production.了解变异性,以减少美国乙烯生产的能源和温室气体足迹。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Dec 15;49(24):14704-16. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03851. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
10
Greenhouse gas emissions and reactive nitrogen releases during the life-cycles of staple food production in China and their mitigation potential.中国主要粮食生产生命周期中的温室气体排放与活性氮释放及其减排潜力
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jun 15;556:116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.204. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing sustainable diet behaviours during the COVID-19 Pandemic: inequitable outcomes across a sociodemographically diverse sample of adults.在 COVID-19 大流行期间改变可持续饮食行为:在社会人口统计学上多样化的成年人样本中存在不平等结果。
J Nutr Sci. 2024 Mar 14;13:e16. doi: 10.1017/jns.2024.9. eCollection 2024.
2
Energy-socio-economic-environmental modelling for the EU energy and post-COVID-19 transitions.面向欧盟能源转型和后 COVID-19 时代的能源-社会经济-环境建模。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 20;805:150329. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150329. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Increased inequalities of per capita CO emissions in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) for shampoos: The basis for comparable life cycle assessment.制定洗发水产品环境足迹类别规则(PEFCR):可比生命周期评估的基础。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Sep;14(5):649-659. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4064. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
2
Separating uncertainty and physiological variability in human PBPK modelling: The example of 2-propanol and its metabolite acetone.在人体 PBPK 建模中分离不确定性和生理变异性:以 2-丙醇及其代谢物丙酮为例。
Toxicol Lett. 2012 Oct 17;214(2):154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.08.016. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
中国人均二氧化碳排放量不平等加剧。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88736-0.
4
Low-carbon pathways for the booming express delivery sector in China.中国快递业繁荣的低碳途径。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 19;12(1):450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20738-4.