• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中性但不中立:“中性”情绪刺激的负性偏向的跨文化比较。

Neutral but not in the middle: cross-cultural comparisons of negative bias of "neutral" emotional stimuli.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Psychology, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1171-1182. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1733933. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2020.1733933
PMID:32102595
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the perception of neutral emotion stimuli can be negative rather than absolutely neutral. In the current study, we examined the negative bias of both neutral faces and scenes, cross-culturally between East Asians (e.g. Koreans) and Caucasian Americans. In all experiments, participants performed a Go/No-go task, by either executing or withholding a response toward neutral stimuli presented in the context of positive or negative stimuli. Differentiating neutral stimuli from negative stimuli was less accurate, measured in , than doing so from positive stimuli. This negative bias was evident with both faces (Experiments 1 and 2) and scenes (Experiment 3). In all experiments, while both ethnic groups demonstrated significant negative biases, there was a subtle modulation of the bias by cultural background. For example, for Korean faces and IAPS scenes, Koreans showed a mitigated negative bias and Caucasian Americans demonstrated a greater negative bias. However, for Caucasian faces, bias was comparable between the two groups. With the possibility of cultural modulation, the prevalent negative bias of neutral emotion questions the validity of the neutrality assumption of the neutral emotion. The study discusses the necessity of methodological and theoretical reconsiderations for the utilisation of neutral emotion stimuli.

摘要

先前的研究表明,对中性情绪刺激的感知可能是负面的,而不是绝对中性的。在当前的研究中,我们跨文化地检验了东亚人(例如韩国人)和白种美国人对中性面孔和场景的负面偏见。在所有实验中,参与者通过对呈现于正性或负性刺激背景中的中性刺激执行或抑制反应来执行 Go/No-go 任务。与将中性刺激与正性刺激区分开来相比,将其与负性刺激区分开来的准确性较差,用 d' 表示。这种负面偏见在面孔(实验 1 和 2)和场景(实验 3)中均很明显。在所有实验中,虽然两个种族群体都表现出明显的负面偏见,但文化背景对偏见有微妙的调节。例如,对于韩国面孔和 IAPS 场景,韩国人表现出较弱的负面偏见,而白种美国人表现出较强的负面偏见。然而,对于白种人面孔,两组之间的偏见相当。由于存在文化调节的可能性,中性情绪的普遍负面偏见质疑了中性情绪的中立性假设的有效性。该研究讨论了对于使用中性情绪刺激,方法学和理论上重新考虑的必要性。

相似文献

1
Neutral but not in the middle: cross-cultural comparisons of negative bias of "neutral" emotional stimuli.中性但不中立:“中性”情绪刺激的负性偏向的跨文化比较。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Sep;34(6):1171-1182. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1733933. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.低频和高频滤波情感面孔的识别记忆:低频驱动情感记忆增强,而高频驱动情感诱发的识别偏差。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):699-715. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0695-2.
3
Differential emotion attribution to neutral faces of own and other races.对本族和其他种族中性面孔的情绪差异归因
Cogn Emot. 2017 Feb;31(2):360-368. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1092419. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
4
Cultural variation in hemifacial asymmetry of emotion expressions.情绪表达的半侧面部不对称中的文化差异。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Sep;40(Pt 3):385-98. doi: 10.1348/014466601164885.
5
Does priming negative emotions really contribute to more positive aesthetic judgments? A comparative study of emotion priming paradigms using emotional faces versus emotional scenes and multiple negative emotions with fEMG.情绪启动真的会促进更积极的审美判断吗?使用情绪面孔与情绪场景以及 fEMG 进行多负性情绪的情绪启动范式的比较研究。
Emotion. 2019 Dec;19(8):1396-1413. doi: 10.1037/emo0000528. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
6
Attentional Bias to Facial Expressions of Different Emotions - A Cross-Cultural Comparison of ≠Akhoe Hai||om and German Children and Adolescents.对不同情绪面部表情的注意偏向——≠Akhoe Hai||om儿童与青少年和德国儿童与青少年的跨文化比较
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 28;11:795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00795. eCollection 2020.
7
Eye contact perception in the West and East: a cross-cultural study.西方与东方的眼神交流认知:一项跨文化研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0118094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118094. eCollection 2015.
8
Other ethnicity effects in ensemble coding of facial expressions.其他种族对面部表情的整体编码的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct;86(7):2412-2423. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02920-8. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
9
Negative bias in fast emotion discrimination in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中快速情绪识别的负性偏差
Psychol Med. 2009 May;39(5):855-64. doi: 10.1017/S0033291708004273. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
10
Saccadic latency is modulated by emotional content of spatially filtered face stimuli.眼跳潜伏期受空间滤波面部刺激情绪内容的调节。
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1384-92. doi: 10.1037/a0028677. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Scarcity mindset facilitates empathy for social pain and prosocial intention: behavioral and neural evidences.稀缺心态促进对社会痛苦的同理心和亲社会意图:行为和神经证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Feb 5;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf015.
2
Autistic and non-autistic individuals show the same amygdala activity during emotional face processing.自闭症和非自闭症个体在处理情绪面孔时表现出相同的杏仁核活动。
Mol Autism. 2024 Jan 10;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00582-9.
3
Learning emotional dialects: A British population study of cross-cultural communication.
学习情绪方言:一项英国人口的跨文化交际研究。
Perception. 2023 Nov;52(11-12):812-843. doi: 10.1177/03010066231204180. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
4
Kick Cat Effect: Social Context Shapes the Form and Extent of Emotional Contagion.踢猫效应:社会环境塑造情绪感染的形式与程度。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;13(7):531. doi: 10.3390/bs13070531.
5
Cultural Differences in Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis.抑制控制中的文化差异:一项激活可能性估计元分析
Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 3;13(6):907. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060907.
6
How does the presence of a surgical face mask impair the perceived intensity of facial emotions?外科口罩对面部情绪感知强度的影响如何?
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0262344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262344. eCollection 2022.
7
Developmental differences in the visual processing of emotionally ambiguous neutral faces based on perceived valence.基于感知效价的情绪中性面孔视觉加工的发展差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 16;16(8):e0256109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256109. eCollection 2021.