• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在体内 4.7 特斯拉 MRI 下进行海马亚区测量和 ILAE 海马硬化亚型分类。

Hippocampal subfield measurement and ILAE hippocampal sclerosis subtype classification with in vivo 4.7 tesla MRI.

机构信息

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 11350 83 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.

Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 11350 83 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2020 Mar;161:106279. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106279. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106279
PMID:32105992
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathological studies indicate that hippocampal sclerosis (HS) consists of three subtypes (ILAE types 1-3 HS). However, HS subtypes currently can only be diagnosed by pathological analysis of hippocampal tissue resected during epilepsy surgery or at autopsy. In vivo diagnosis of HS subtypes holds potential to improve our understanding of these variants in the ipsilateral as well as contralateral hippocampus. In this study, we aimed to: i) evaluate the reliability of our histology-derived segmentation protocol when applied to in vivo MRI; and ii) characterize variability of HS subtypes along the hippocampal long axis in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Eleven subjects with unilateral HS were compared with ten healthy controls. We used 4.7 T MRI to acquire high resolution MR Images of the hippocampus in each subject. In vivo MRI-based diagnoses of HS subtypes were then determined in each patient by two methods: i) hippocampal subfield volumetry of the entire hippocampal body; and ii) subfield area analysis at multiple thin slices throughout the hippocampal body.

RESULTS

Hippocampal body subfield segmentation demonstrated excellent reliability and volumetry of the symptomatic hippocampus revealed abnormalities in all eleven patients. Six subjects demonstrated findings consistent with type 1 HS while five subjects had volumetry-defined atypical HS (two with type 2 HS & three with type 3 HS) in the symptomatic hippocampus, while five subjects were found to have type 3 HS in the contralateral hippocampus. Subfield area analyses demonstrated remarkable variability of HS subtypes along the hippocampal long axis, both ipsilateral and contralateral to the seizure focus.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results provide preliminary evidence that determining HS Subtype using in vivo MRI may allow preoperative diagnosis of ILAE HS subtypes. Further studies are essential to determine the pathological correlates of these neuroimaging findings. The heterogeneity of abnormalities observed along the long axis of the hippocampus is consistent with previous autopsy studies and highlights the necessity of studying the entire hippocampus both ipsilateral and contralateral to the seizure focus in these future studies.

摘要

目的

神经病理学研究表明,海马硬化(HS)由三个亚型(ILAE 1-3 型 HS)组成。然而,HS 亚型目前只能通过癫痫手术或尸检中切除的海马组织的病理分析来诊断。HS 亚型的体内诊断有可能提高我们对同侧和对侧海马中这些变体的理解。在这项研究中,我们旨在:i)评估我们的组织学衍生分割方案应用于体内 MRI 的可靠性;ii)描述癫痫患者沿海马长轴的 HS 亚型变异性。

方法

将 11 例单侧 HS 患者与 10 例健康对照进行比较。我们使用 4.7T MRI 对每位患者的海马进行高分辨率 MRI 采集。然后,通过两种方法在每位患者中确定基于体内 MRI 的 HS 亚型诊断:i)整个海马体的海马亚区容积测量;ii)在整个海马体的多个薄片上进行亚区面积分析。

结果

海马体亚区分割显示出极好的可靠性,症状性海马体的容积测量显示所有 11 例患者均存在异常。6 例患者表现出与 1 型 HS 一致的发现,而 5 例患者的症状性海马体有容积定义的非典型 HS(2 例为 2 型 HS,3 例为 3 型 HS),而 5 例患者在对侧海马体中发现 3 型 HS。亚区面积分析表明,在癫痫灶同侧和对侧的海马长轴上,HS 亚型存在显著的变异性。

意义

我们的结果初步证明,使用体内 MRI 确定 HS 亚型可能允许术前诊断 ILAE HS 亚型。进一步的研究对于确定这些神经影像学发现的病理相关性至关重要。沿海马长轴观察到的异常的异质性与之前的尸检研究一致,突出了在这些未来的研究中对癫痫灶同侧和对侧的整个海马进行研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
Hippocampal subfield measurement and ILAE hippocampal sclerosis subtype classification with in vivo 4.7 tesla MRI.在体内 4.7 特斯拉 MRI 下进行海马亚区测量和 ILAE 海马硬化亚型分类。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Mar;161:106279. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106279. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
2
Subfield atrophy pattern in temporal lobe epilepsy with and without mesial sclerosis detected by high-resolution MRI at 4 Tesla: preliminary results.通过4特斯拉高分辨率磁共振成像检测的伴有和不伴有内侧颞叶硬化的颞叶癫痫的脑叶亚区萎缩模式:初步结果
Epilepsia. 2009 Jun;50(6):1474-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02010.x. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
3
Investigation of hippocampal substructures in focal temporal lobe epilepsy with and without hippocampal sclerosis at 7T.7T下伴或不伴海马硬化的局灶性颞叶癫痫中海马亚结构的研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 May;45(5):1359-1370. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25447. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Automated volumetry of hippocampal subfields in temporal lobe epilepsy.颞叶癫痫中海马亚区的自动容积测量
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Sep;175:106692. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106692. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
5
Hippocampal subfield segmentation in temporal lobe epilepsy: Relation to outcomes.颞叶癫痫中海马亚区分割:与结局的关系。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Jun;137(6):598-608. doi: 10.1111/ane.12926. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
6
Automated subfield volumetric analysis of hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy using high-resolution T2-weighed MR imaging.利用高分辨率T2加权磁共振成像对颞叶癫痫患者海马进行自动子区域容积分析
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Jun 13;12:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.06.008. eCollection 2016.
7
Lateralizing Characteristics of Morphometric Changes to Hippocampus and Amygdala in Unilateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy with Hippocampal Sclerosis.海马硬化性单侧颞叶癫癎中海马和杏仁核形态学改变的偏侧化特征。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 26;58(4):480. doi: 10.3390/medicina58040480.
8
Hippocampal atrophy on MRI is predictive of histopathological patterns and surgical prognosis in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis.磁共振成像(MRI)显示的海马萎缩可预测内侧颞叶癫痫伴海马硬化的组织病理学模式和手术预后。
Epilepsy Res. 2016 Dec;128:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
9
Hippocampal sclerosis without visually detectable hippocampal MRI abnormalities: automated subfield volumetric analysis.无肉眼可见海马 MRI 异常的海马硬化症:自动子区容积分析。
Jpn J Radiol. 2020 Nov;38(11):1020-1027. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-01019-y. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
Histopathological validation and clinical correlates of hippocampal subfield volumetry based on T2-weighted MRI in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis.基于T2加权磁共振成像的海马亚区体积测量在伴海马硬化的颞叶癫痫中的组织病理学验证及临床相关性
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Nov;177:106759. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106759. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary study on changes in volume and functional connectivity of hippocampal subregions in patients with diabetic retinopathy.糖尿病视网膜病变患者海马亚区体积及功能连接变化的初步研究
Brain Imaging Behav. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s11682-025-01029-2.
2
Segmentation of hippocampal subregion via 5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.通过5特斯拉磁共振成像对海马亚区进行分割:一项比较研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):3861-3874. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2169. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Immunohistochemical field parcellation of the human hippocampus along its antero-posterior axis.
人类海马体沿前后轴的免疫组织化学领域分区。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Mar;229(2):359-385. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02725-9. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
4
Seizure control does not predict hippocampal subfield volume change in children with focal drug-resistant epilepsy.癫痫灶药物难治性儿童的癫痫发作控制并不能预测海马亚区体积的变化。
Neuroradiol J. 2022 Aug;35(4):454-460. doi: 10.1177/19714009211049078. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
The Most Common Lesions Detected by Neuroimaging as Causes of Epilepsy.神经影像学检测到的最常见的癫痫病因病变。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 22;57(3):294. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030294.
6
Diagnostic Performance of MRI Volumetry in Epilepsy Patients With Hippocampal Sclerosis Supported Through a Random Forest Automatic Classification Algorithm.通过随机森林自动分类算法支持的MRI容积测量在海马硬化癫痫患者中的诊断性能
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 22;12:613967. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.613967. eCollection 2021.
7
Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging in human epilepsy: A systematic review.超高场磁共振成像在人类癫痫中的应用:系统评价。
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102602. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102602. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Histological correlates of hippocampal magnetization transfer images in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy patients.耐药性颞叶癫痫患者海马磁化传递图像的组织学相关性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102463. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102463. Epub 2020 Oct 8.