• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

书面健康信息的高与低可读性水平对自我效能感的影响:加工流畅性效应的随机对照研究。

Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.

作者信息

Okuhara Tsuyoshi, Ishikawa Hirono, Ueno Haruka, Okada Hiroko, Kato Mio, Kiuchi Takahiro

机构信息

The University of Tokyo, Japan.

Teikyo University, Japan.

出版信息

Health Psychol Open. 2020 Feb 12;7(1):2055102920905627. doi: 10.1177/2055102920905627. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/2055102920905627
PMID:32110424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7016314/
Abstract

We investigated the relationship of processing fluency of written information about exercise to participants' perceived interest, safety, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and behavioral intention regarding the exercise. We randomly assigned 400 men and women aged 40-69 years to control or intervention conditions. Perceived self-efficacy of performing the exercise in the intervention group (i.e. easy to read) was significantly higher than that in the control group (i.e. difficult to read) ( = 0.04). Easy-to-read written health information may be important not only for making written health information comprehensible but also for increasing readers' self-efficacy for adopting health-related behaviors.

摘要

我们研究了关于运动的书面信息的处理流畅性与参与者对运动的感知兴趣、安全性、自我效能感、结果期望和行为意图之间的关系。我们将400名年龄在40 - 69岁之间的男性和女性随机分配到对照组或干预组。干预组(即易于阅读)中进行该运动的自我效能感显著高于对照组(即难以阅读)(= 0.04)。易于阅读的书面健康信息不仅对于使书面健康信息易于理解很重要,而且对于提高读者采取健康相关行为的自我效能感也很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d4/7016314/7fd6a9c1d3b5/10.1177_2055102920905627-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d4/7016314/7fd6a9c1d3b5/10.1177_2055102920905627-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3d4/7016314/7fd6a9c1d3b5/10.1177_2055102920905627-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of high versus low readability level of written health information on self-efficacy: A randomized controlled study of the processing fluency effect.书面健康信息的高与低可读性水平对自我效能感的影响:加工流畅性效应的随机对照研究。
Health Psychol Open. 2020 Feb 12;7(1):2055102920905627. doi: 10.1177/2055102920905627. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
2
Processing fluency effect of a leaflet for breast and cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled study in Japan.日本一项关于乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查招贴画的加工流畅性效应的随机对照研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Dec;23(10):1250-1260. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1492732. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
3
Evaluation of easy-to-read information material on healthy life-styles written with the help of citizens' collaboration through networking.对通过网络借助公民协作编写的关于健康生活方式的易读信息材料的评估。
Promot Educ. 2006;13(3):191-6.
4
Designing persuasive health materials using processing fluency: a literature review.利用加工流畅性设计有说服力的健康材料:文献综述
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jun 8;10(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2524-x.
5
Assessment of readability and learning of easy-to-read educational health materials designed and written with the help of citizens by means of two non-alternative methods.通过两种非替代方法对在公民帮助下设计和编写的易读教育健康材料的可读性和学习情况进行评估。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006 May;11(2):123-32. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-7852-2.
6
7
Discrepancy between older clients' ability to read and comprehend and the reading level of written educational materials used by occupational therapists.老年客户的阅读和理解能力与职业治疗师使用的书面教育材料的阅读水平之间的差异。
Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jan-Feb;60(1):70-80. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.1.70.
8
Languages for different health information readers: multitrait-multimethod content analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews textual summary formats.不同健康信息读者适用的语言:考科蓝系统评价文本摘要格式的多特质-多方法内容分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0716-x.
9
A readability comparison of anti- versus pro-influenza vaccination online messages in Japan.日本抗流感疫苗与促流感疫苗接种在线信息的可读性比较。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Feb 21;6:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.013. eCollection 2017 Jun.
10
Is less readable liked better? The case of font readability in poetry appreciation.字体可读性对诗歌欣赏的影响:更难读的反而更受欢迎?
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0225757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225757. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a signal detection approach to understand the impacts of processing fluency and efficacy on accuracy in misinformation detection.采用信号检测方法来理解信息处理流畅性和有效性对错误信息检测准确性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1417910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417910. eCollection 2024.
2
Dual-process theories to counter the anti-vaccination movement.对抗反疫苗运动的双加工理论。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Sep 22;20:101205. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101205. eCollection 2020 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Processing fluency effect of a leaflet for breast and cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled study in Japan.日本一项关于乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查招贴画的加工流畅性效应的随机对照研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Dec;23(10):1250-1260. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1492732. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
2
Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review.在线健康信息的可读性:一项元叙事系统评价
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):487-492. doi: 10.1177/1062860617751639. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
3
The association between physical activity and chronic diseases in European adults.
欧洲成年人身体活动与慢性病的关系。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Feb;18(1):140-149. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1400109. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
Designing persuasive health materials using processing fluency: a literature review.利用加工流畅性设计有说服力的健康材料:文献综述
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jun 8;10(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2524-x.
5
Readability comparison of pro- and anti-HPV-vaccination online messages in Japan.日本支持和反对 HPV 疫苗接种的在线信息的可读性比较。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Oct;100(10):1859-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 13.
6
A readability comparison of anti- versus pro-influenza vaccination online messages in Japan.日本抗流感疫苗与促流感疫苗接种在线信息的可读性比较。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Feb 21;6:47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.013. eCollection 2017 Jun.
7
Readability Comparison of Pro- and Anti-Cancer Screening Online Messages in Japan.日本支持与反对癌症筛查在线信息的可读性比较。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):5237-5242. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5237.
8
Understanding online health information: Evaluation, tools, and strategies.理解在线健康信息:评估、工具与策略。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.028. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Written Information Improves Patient Knowledge About Implanted Ports.书面信息可提高患者对植入式端口的了解。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;20(2):E28-33. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.E28-E33.
10
Barriers and Facilitators for Type-2 Diabetes Management in South Asians: A Systematic Review.南亚2型糖尿病管理的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0136202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136202. eCollection 2015.